0
RESEARCH PAPERS

Modeling Radiation Heat Transfer With Participating Media in Solid Oxide Fuel Cells

[+] Author and Article Information
J. D. VanderSteen, J. G. Pharoah

Department of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, Fuel Cell Research Centre (FCRC),  Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada

J. Fuel Cell Sci. Technol 3(1), 62-67 (Jul 18, 2005) (6 pages) doi:10.1115/1.2134738 History: Received June 09, 2005; Revised July 18, 2005

Solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) technology has been shown to be viable, but its profitability has not yet been seen. To achieve a high net efficiency at a low net cost, a detailed understanding of the transport processes both inside and outside of the SOFC stack is required. Of particular significance is an accurate determination of the temperature distribution because material properties, chemical kinetics, and transport properties depend heavily on the temperature. Effective utilization of the heat can lead to a substantial increase in overall system efficiency and decrease in operating cost. Despite the extreme importance in accurately predicting temperature, the SOFC modeling community appears to be uncertain about the importance of incorporating radiation into their models. Although some models have included it, the majority of models ignore radiative heat transfer. SOFCs operate at temperatures around or above 1200 K, where radiation effects can be significant. In order to correctly predict the radiation heat transfer, participating gases must also be included. Water vapor and carbon dioxide can absorb, emit, and scatter radiation, and are present at the anode in high concentrations. This paper presents a simple thermal transport model for analyzing heat transfer and improving thermal management within planar SOFCs. The model was implemented using a commercial computational fluid dynamic code and includes conduction, convection, and radiation in a participating media. It is clear from this study that radiation must be considered when modeling solid oxide fuel cells. The effect of participating media radiation was shown to be minimal in this geometry, but it is likely to be more important in tubular geometries.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2006 by American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 1

Schematic of the anode model domain

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 2

Temperature at the top of the channel

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 3

Temperature porfile for case with no radiation

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 4

Temperature profile for case with radiation

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In