0
RESEARCH PAPERS

A Reduced Fuel Cell Stack Model for Control and Fault Diagnosis

[+] Author and Article Information
Damiano Di Penta

 RENAULT, 1 avenue du Golf (FR TCR RUC T65) 78288 Guyancourt Francedamiano.di-penta@renault.com

Karim Bencherif

 RENAULT, 1 avenue du Golf (FR TCR RUC T65) 78288 Guyancourt Francekarim.ben-cherif@renault.com

Michel Sorine

 INRIA-Rocquencourt, SOSSO2, domaine de Voluceau-Rocquencourt-B.P. 105 78153 Le Chesnay Cedexmichel.Sorine@inria.fr

Qinghua Zhang

 IRISA, SOSSO2, campus universitaire de Beaulieu, 35042 Rennes Cedexzhang@irisa.fr

The tests were performed with 3M MEA at 3M Center, St Paul, MN, USA.

J. Fuel Cell Sci. Technol 3(4), 384-388 (Mar 03, 2006) (5 pages) doi:10.1115/1.2349517 History: Received November 08, 2005; Revised March 03, 2006

This paper proposes a reduced fuel cell stack model for control and fault diagnosis which was validated with experimental data. Firstly, the electro-chemical phenomena are modeled based on a mechanism of gas adsorption/desorption on catalysts at the anode and at the cathode of the stack, including activation, diffusion, and carbon monoxide poisoning. The electrical voltage of a stack cell is then modeled by the difference between the two electrode potentials. A simplified thermal model of the fuel cell stack is also developed in order to take into account heat generation from reactions, heat transfers, and evaporation/condensation of water. Finally, the efficiency ratio is computed as a model output. It is used to evaluate the efficiency changes of the entire system, providing an important indicator for fault detection.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2006 by American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 7

Comparison of 3M small stack temperature transient experiments (–) with simulations (- -)

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 6

Comparison of 3M cell voltage transient experiments (–) with simulations (- -) for a variation of CO(a) and for a variation of air bleed (b)

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 5

Comparison of 3M cell voltage static experiments with simulations at 70°C∕50ppmCO(a), 80°C∕100ppmCO(b) and 90°C∕200ppmCO(c), for different air bleed ratios

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 2

Polarization curve

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 1

Fuel cell system

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In