Dynamic Model of 5kW SOFC CHP Test Station

[+] Author and Article Information
Jaakko Saarinen, Matias Halinen, Jukka Ylijoki, Matti Noponen, Pekka Simell, Jari Kiviaho

 VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, Biologinkuja 3-5, P.O. Box 1000, FIN-02044 VTT, Finland

J. Fuel Cell Sci. Technol 4(4), 397-405 (Jun 22, 2006) (9 pages) doi:10.1115/1.2759502 History: Received November 30, 2005; Revised June 22, 2006

A dynamical model for a 5kW class solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) combined heat and power (CHP) test station has been composed using the APROS® environment. The model is based on a real test station being constructed and operated at VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland and it comprises the following main components of the real test system: the autothermal reforming unit, SOFC stack situated inside a furnace, catalytic afterburner, and three heat exchangers. The constructed model has been verified against experimental results obtained from the autothermal reforming unit, catalytic afterburner, and the two cathode side heat exchangers. The model has been used for the phenomenological studies of the system during current transient simulations using a simplified and fast zero-dimensional model including internal reforming reactions for the SOFC stack. The test station model was capable of operating at a speed of 18 times the real time using a standard personal computer.

Copyright © 2007 by American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.



Grahic Jump Location
Figure 1

Schematic layout of the SOFC CHP test station

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 3

ATR outlet molar fractions in Case 2

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 4

ATR outlet molar fractions in Case 3

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 5

Modeled molar fractions at the different catalysts of the catalytic afterburner

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 6

Simulated stack current-voltage and current-power curve

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 7

Stack voltage, average SOFC-gas temperature, and average stack temperature during a current transient simulation

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 8

System temperatures during a current transient simulation

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 2

ATR outlet molar fractions in Case 1




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In