Research Papers

Demonstration of a 4-Cells SOFC Stack Under Different Experimental Conditions

[+] Author and Article Information
M. Bertoldi, T. Zandonella

 Eurocoating SpA, via Al Dos de la Roda 60, 38057—Pergine Valsugana (TN), Italy

V. A. C. Haanappel, J. Mertens, J. Remmel, L. G. J. de Haart

 Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, D-52425 Jülich, Germany

J. Fuel Cell Sci. Technol 5(1), 011004 (Jan 16, 2008) (5 pages) doi:10.1115/1.2398952 History: Received November 30, 2005; Revised April 10, 2006; Published January 16, 2008

Forschungszentrum Juelich (FZJ) has developed over the past years a well-known SOFC stack technology for a planar cell configuration. 1.5mm thick anode supported large-area cells based on a NiOYSZ (anode) and a YSZ (electrolyte) system are integrated in a stack using bipolar plates made of a special ferritic stainless steel acting as current collector and gas distributor. Materials, processes, and surface treatments have been selected and optimized to reduce mismatch between different components and to achieve high power densities. The recent SOFC stacks of F-design, fuelled with humidified hydrogen and air has demonstrated a power density as high as 0.6Wcm2 at 800°C and a stable behavior up to 8000h of operation. These tests are usually performed in standard conditions, using a low value of fuel utilization and a precise control of gas composition, fuel, and airflow rates and temperature distribution. It seems quite difficult to maintain the same strict control of these parameters when the stack operates in an actual device. Therefore, it is of interest to investigate the effect of different experimental conditions on the electrochemical performance that can simulate stack behavior as integrated in a real system. For example, an actual fuel cell system is designed to operate with fuel utilization in the range between 70% and 85% due to efficiency considerations. In addition, variations of the electric load and of the corresponding flow rates must be expected that give rise to temperature changes and gradients within the stack. Part of these effects might be detrimental for the stack service life, and can be limited by a well-designed balance of plant of the system. In this contribution, results of a series of tests on a 4-cells SOFC stack of F design, manufactured by FZJ and conducted in a new SOFC test bench by Eurocoating, are presented. This facility allows the investigation of the performance of stacks up to 1kW as a function of several experimental parameters, including the amplitude of compressive loading, inlet gas temperature and pressure, flow rate, and fuel utilization.

Copyright © 2008 by American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.



Grahic Jump Location
Figure 1

2-cells stack architecture in the F-design configuration (courtesy of FZJ)

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 2

F-1004-4 short-stack connected to the adapter plate before testing. Voltage Pt wires in front, and inlet and outlet pipes as well as current rods are visible on the bottom and rear side.

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 3

Acceptance (a) and verification (b) test results on the F-1004-4 stack in standard conditions. Cell order (1–4) is from bottom to top in the stack.

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 4

Influence of loading amplitude on stack performance (A series). Cutoff voltage is shown as dashed line.

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 5

Influence of H2 dilution on stack performance (B series). Cutoff voltage is shown as a dashed line.

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 6

Influence of H2 flow rate on stack performance (C series). Cutoff voltage is shown as a dashed line.

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 7

Influence of air/fuel ratio on stack performance (D series). Cutoff voltage is shown as a dashed line.

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 8

Influence of humidification on stack performance (E series). Cutoff voltage is shown as a dashed line.



Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In