0
Research Papers

Probabilistic-Based Design Methodology for Solid Oxide Fuel Cell Stacks

[+] Author and Article Information
X. Sun, A. M. Tartakovsky, M. A. Khaleel

 Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA 99352

http://www.seca.doe.gov/∼secamat/

J. Fuel Cell Sci. Technol 6(2), 021004 (Feb 23, 2009) (10 pages) doi:10.1115/1.2971054 History: Received May 01, 2007; Revised December 06, 2007; Published February 23, 2009

A probabilistic-based component design methodology is developed for a solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) stack. This method takes into account the randomness in SOFC material properties as well as the stresses arising from different manufacturing and operating conditions. The purpose of this work is to provide the SOFC designers a design methodology so that the desired level of component reliability can be achieved with deterministic design functions using an equivalent safety factor to account for the uncertainties in material properties and structural stresses. Multiphysics-based finite element analyses were used to predict the electrochemical and thermal mechanical responses of SOFC stacks with different geometric variations and under different operating conditions. Failures in the anode and the seal were used as design examples. The predicted maximum principal stresses in the anode and the seal were compared with the experimentally determined strength characteristics for the anode and the seal, respectively. Component failure probabilities for the current design were then calculated under different operating conditions. It was found that anode failure probability is very low under all conditions examined. The seal failure probability is relatively high, particularly for high fuel utilization rate under low average cell temperature. Next, the procedures for calculating the equivalent safety factors for the anode and seal were demonstrated so that a uniform failure probability of the anode and seal can be achieved. Analysis procedures were also included for non-normal distributed random variables so that more realistic distributions of strength and stress can be analyzed using the proposed design methodology.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2009 by American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 1

Planar SOFC design provided by the current MARC GUI

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 2

(a) Predicted temperature distribution in the anode (in K). (b) Predicted temperature distribution in the seal (in K).

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 3

(a) Predicted maximum principal stresses in the anode (in Pa). (b) Predicted maximum principal stress in the seal (in Pa).

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 4

Predicted failure probability for the seal under different cell operating conditions

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 5

Experimentally measured anode strength and its associated Weibull parameters

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 6

Weibull parameters for the anode (Ni-YSZ) strength distribution as a function of temperature

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In