0
Research Papers

Computational Fluid Dynamic Analysis of a Seal-Less Solid Oxide Fuel Cell Stack

[+] Author and Article Information
Taner Akbay

Department of Business Incubation, Central Research Institute, Mitsubishi Materials Corporation, Ibaraki 311-0102, Japanakbay@mmc.co.jp

Norihisa Chitose, Takashi Miyazawa, Makoto Shibata

Department of Business Incubation, Central Research Institute, Mitsubishi Materials Corporation, Ibaraki 311-0102, Japan

Futoshi Nishiwaki, Toru Inagaki

Energy Use R&D Center, The Kansai Electric Power Co., Inc., Hyogo 661-0974, Japan

1

Corresponding author.

J. Fuel Cell Sci. Technol 6(4), 041007 (Aug 12, 2009) (6 pages) doi:10.1115/1.3081464 History: Received June 13, 2007; Revised June 05, 2008; Published August 12, 2009

Combined heat and power generation systems accommodating intermediate temperature (600800°C) solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) modules have been developed by Mitsubishi Materials Corporation and The Kansai Electric Power Co., Inc. High overall efficiency system units are designed in such a way that their output power can be modularized by altering the number of stacks inside the SOFC modules. The seal-less design concept is adopted to build generic stacks made up of stainless steel separators and disk-type planar electrolyte-supported cells. Innovative stack design together with its precise integration with the hot balance of plant components inside the SOFC module requires a number of design iterations supported by carefully planned experiments. In order to achieve improved levels of efficiency and reliability via optimum number of iterative cycles, we believe that the computational techniques offer significant advantages. In this work, a commercial computational fluid dynamics code is employed for solving the conservation of mass, momentum, and energy equations with an additional electrochemical submodel to simulate the coupled multiphysics processes in a generic SOFC stack. This approach proved to be effective in providing necessary guidance for identifying problem areas in the stack design and estimating the stack performance via less expensive numerical experiments. The results of the computational model are also compared with data obtained by experimental measurements.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2009 by American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 1

Assembly of the repeat unit.

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 2

CAD representation of the generic 34 cell SOFC stack

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 3

Surface mesh and the full stack model

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 4

Gaseous species’ concentrations on selected cells

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 5

Temperature (°C) distribution

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 6

Temperature (°C) contour

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 7

Temperature (°C) contours on selected separators

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 9

Comparison of measured and calculated stack temperature

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 8

Calculated current density and stack potential

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In