0
Research Papers

Numerical Simulation of Operating Parameters in a Methane Fueled Steam Reforming Reactor

[+] Author and Article Information
Joonguen Park

Department of Mechanical Engineering, KAIST, 373-1, Guseong-Dong, Yuseong-Gu, Daejeon, 305-701, Republic of Korea

Joongmyeon Bae1

Department of Mechanical Engineering, KAIST, 373-1, Guseong-Dong, Yuseong-Gu, Daejeon, 305-701, Republic of Koreajmbae@kaist.ac.kr

1

Corresponding author.

J. Fuel Cell Sci. Technol 8(5), 051022 (Jul 12, 2011) (6 pages) doi:10.1115/1.4004175 History: Received August 09, 2010; Revised August 14, 2010; Published July 12, 2011; Online July 12, 2011

This paper studies the heat and mass transfer characteristics in a steam reforming reactor using numerical simulation and investigates the operating parameters for effective hydrogen production. Simultaneous analysis of governing equations and chemical reaction equations is carried out in a multiphysical simulation. The major reactions are assumed to be the steam reforming, water-gas shift (WGS), and direct steam reforming reactions. The temperature and species concentrations measured for the experiment are compared with numerical results. After validation of the developed code, numerical work is carried out to study correlations between the performance and operating parameters, which are the wall temperature, the inlet temperature, the steam to carbon ratio (SCR), and the gas hourly space velocity (GHSV). The fuel conversion increases with the high wall temperature due to the increased heat transfer. The inlet temperature may not affect the fuel conversion, if the reformer length is long enough. However, the heat transfer limitation can occur near the inlet when the inlet temperature is over 300 °C. The concentration of carbon monoxide becomes lower with increasing SCR due to the decreased WGS reaction rate. The high GHSV causes the short residence time and it is the reason for the low fuel conversion.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2011 by American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 1

The computational domain of a steam reforming reactor

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 4

(a) Temperature and fuel conversion, (b) dry concentration under various wall temperatures

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 5

Temperature and fuel conversion under various inlet temperatures

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 6

Species concentration under various SCRs

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 7

Temperature and fuel conversion under various GHSVs

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 2

(a) Schematic diagram for steam reforming experiment, (b) measured points of the temperature

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 3

Comparison between experiment results and numerical results, (a) temperature at the center, (b) species concentration at the outlet

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In