Research Papers

Degradation Issues in Solid Oxide Cells During High Temperature Electrolysis

[+] Author and Article Information
M. S. Sohal1

Idaho National Laboratory, Idaho Falls, ID 83415-2210manohar.sohal@inl.gov Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139-4307manohar.sohal@inl.gov University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112manohar.sohal@inl.gov

J. E. O’Brien, C. M. Stoots, V. I. Sharma, B. Yildiz, A. Virkar

Idaho National Laboratory, Idaho Falls, ID 83415-2210 Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139-4307 University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112


Corresponding author.

J. Fuel Cell Sci. Technol 9(1), 011017 (Dec 27, 2011) (10 pages) doi:10.1115/1.4003787 History: Received January 24, 2011; Revised February 25, 2011; Published December 27, 2011; Online December 27, 2011

Idaho National Laboratory (INL) is performing high-temperature electrolysis research to generate hydrogen using solid oxide electrolysis cells (SOECs). The project goals are to address the technical and degradation issues associated with the SOECs. This paper provides a summary of various ongoing INL and INL sponsored activities aimed at addressing SOEC degradation. These activities include stack testing, post-test examination, degradation modeling, and a list of issues that need to be addressed in future. Major degradation issues relating to solid oxide fuel cells (SOFC) are relatively better understood than those for SOECs. Some of the degradation mechanisms in SOFCs include contact problems between adjacent cell components, microstructural deterioration (coarsening) of the porous electrodes, and blocking of the reaction sites within the electrodes. Contact problems include delamination of an electrode from the electrolyte, growth of a poorly (electronically) conducting oxide layer between the metallic interconnect plates and the electrodes, and lack of contact between the interconnect and the electrode. INL’s test results on high temperature electrolysis (HTE) using solid oxide cells do not provide clear evidence of whether different events lead to similar or drastically different electrochemical degradation mechanisms. Post-test examination of the solid oxide electrolysis cells showed that the hydrogen electrode and interconnect get partially oxidized and become nonconductive. This is most likely caused by the hydrogen stream composition and flow rate during cool down. The oxygen electrode side of the stacks seemed to be responsible for the observed degradation due to large areas of electrode delamination. Based on the oxygen electrode appearance, the degradation of these stacks was largely controlled by the oxygen electrode delamination rate. Virkar and co-workers have developed a SOEC model based on concepts in local thermodynamic equilibrium in systems otherwise in global thermodynamic nonequilibrium. This model is under continued development. It shows that electronic conduction through the electrolyte, however small, must be taken into account for determining local oxygen chemical potential, within the electrolyte. The chemical potential within the electrolyte may lie out of bounds in relation to values at the electrodes in the electrolyzer mode. Under certain conditions, high pressures can develop in the electrolyte just under the oxygen electrode (anode)/electrolyte interface, leading to electrode delamination. This theory is being further refined and tested by introducing some electronic conduction in the electrolyte.

Copyright © 2012 by American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.



Grahic Jump Location
Figure 1

Individual cell performance in a three-cell stack operating at 800 °C for > 1000 h [4]

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 2

Microstructure of a typical cell stack (from left to right: fuel electrode, electrolyte, barrier layer, and oxygen electrode); (a) a typical cross-section, (b) cross-section showing delamination between electrolyte and barrier layer, and (c) cross-section showing delamination between barrier layer and O2 -electrode [4]

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 3

Possible reaction mechanisms at the steam/H2 -electrode in a SOEC [6]: (a) adsorption of H2 O on the YSZ surface and proton diffusion on the surface or in the bulk of YSZ, (b) adsorption of H2 O on the YSZ surface and electronic conduction in YSZ is assumed, (c) adsorption of H2 O on the Ni surface and diffusion of oxygen on the Ni surface, and (d) H2 O adsorbed at the TPB and hydrogen diffusion on the Ni surface

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 4

Area-specific resistance of a 25-cell stack as a function of time for a 1000-h test [11]

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 5

Hydrogen production rates during 1000-hour long-term test [11]

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 6

Time history of ILS module ASR values, voltages, and current over 700 h of operation

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 7

Time history of H2 production rate in the ILS

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 8

SEM view of the electrolyte and O2 -electrode [13]

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 9

Chromium deposition in SOEC and SOFC [12]

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 10

Electrode delamination after 1500 h of operation [12]

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 11

Si capping layer on H2 -electrode [12]

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 12

Partial recovery of SOEC degradation [12]




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In