0
Research Papers

The Effect of Inhomogeneous Compression on Water Transport in the Cathode of a Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cell

[+] Author and Article Information
Anders C. Olesen1

Torsten Berning

Søren K. Kær

Department of Energy Technology,  Aalborg University, Aalborg East, 9220 Denmarkskk@et.aau.dk

1

Corresponding author.

J. Fuel Cell Sci. Technol 9(3), 031010 (Apr 26, 2012) (7 pages) doi:10.1115/1.4006475 History: Received December 09, 2011; Revised March 06, 2012; Published April 26, 2012; Online April 26, 2012

A three-dimensional, multicomponent, two-fluid model developed in the commercial CFD package CFX 13 (ANSYS Inc.) is used to investigate the effect of porous media compression on water transport in a proton exchange membrane fuel cell (PEMFC). The PEMFC model only consist of the cathode channel, gas diffusion layer, microporous layer, and catalyst layer, excluding the membrane and anode. In the porous media liquid water transport is described by the capillary pressure gradient, momentum loss via the Darcy-Forchheimer equation, and mass transfer between phases by a nonequilibrium phase change model. Furthermore, the presence of irreducible liquid water is taken into account. In order to account for compression, porous media morphology variations are specified based on the gas diffusion layer (GDL) through-plane strain and intrusion which are stated as a function of compression. These morphology variations affect gas and liquid water transport, and hence liquid water distribution and the risk of blocking active sites. Hence, water transport is studied under GDL compression in order to investigate the qualitative effects. Two simulation cases are compared; one with and one without compression.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2012 by American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 3

Oxygen molar fraction distribution without and with compression

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 4

Phase change rate without compression

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 2

Liquid volume fraction/saturation distribution without and with compression

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 1

Computational domain with and without compression

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In