Research Papers

Ultrasonic Bonding of Membrane Electrode Assemblies for Low Temperature Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells

[+] Author and Article Information
Joseph Beck, Casey Hoffman, Steve Buelte

 Center for Automation Technologies and Systems, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY 12180

Daniel Walczyk1

 Center for Automation Technologies and Systems, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY 12180


Corresponding author.

J. Fuel Cell Sci. Technol 9(5), 051005 (Aug 22, 2012) (8 pages) doi:10.1115/1.4007136 History: Received March 20, 2012; Revised May 29, 2012; Published August 22, 2012; Online August 22, 2012

Low temperature proton exchange membrane (PEM) fuel cells currently dominate the fuel cell market, yet there are materials-, cost-, reliability-, and manufacturing-related challenges that hinder widespread commercial success of this promising technology. With regards to manufacturing, one of the main process bottlenecks is thermal bonding of electrode and membrane components into a unitized membrane electrode assembly (MEA). Recent work has shown that ultrasonic bonding can serve as a direct replacement for thermal bonding for high-temperature PEM fuel cells with dramatic reductions in cycle time and energy consumption but no significant degradation in performance. This paper investigates the possible use of ultrasonic bonding for low-temperature PEM MEAs operated at 65 °C. Polarization curves and 1000 Hz impedance were measured for MEAs with a five-layer architecture comprised of Nafion 115 membrane and carbon paper-based gas diffusion electrodes (GDE) that were thermally bonded and ultrasonically bonded using commercial equipment. The effect of membrane condition (conditioned and dry), electrode type (commercially available, custom-made with lower platinum loadings), and process conditions are investigated. Experimental results demonstrate clear trends. Both custom-made GDEs with lower platinum loading performed best suggesting that electrode architecture and composition can be optimized for ultrasonic bonding. There was little difference in performance between dry and conditioned membrane, which helps explain current industrial practice. Statistical analysis of an experimental design where ultrasonic bonding energy and pressure were varied suggests that neither parameter significantly affects MEA performance and that the process is robust. Similar analysis of thermal bonding with temperature and pressure varied suggests that temperature has a significant effect on MEA performance. However, the most important results of all experimentation are that process cycle time and energy consumption are reduced by nearly two orders-of-magnitude using ultrasonic bonding.

Copyright © 2012 by American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.



Grahic Jump Location
Figure 1

(a) Schematic of standard 5-layer MEA architecture and (b) dimensioned (cm) drawing of low temperature MEA

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 2

(a) Labeled component diagram of ultrasonic bonding system and (b) actual system used for research

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 3

Schematic of labeled MEA made by hand in ultrasonic setup prior to bonding

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 4

(a) 40 ton hot press used to bond MEAs and (b) schematic of MEA in press prior to thermal sealing

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 5

Cell testing hardware

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 6

Effect of electrode loading and architecture on ultrasonically bonded MEAs

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 7

Effect of electrode loading and architecture on thermally bonded MEAs




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In