0
Research Papers

Computational Study of Edge Cooling for Open-Cathode Polymer Electrolyte Fuel Cell Stacks

[+] Author and Article Information
Agus P. Sasmito

e-mail: ap.sasmito@gmail.com

Tariq Shamim

Mechanical Engineering,
Masdar Institute of Science and Technology,
Masdar City,
P.O. Box 54224, Abu Dhabi,
United Arab Emirates

Erik Birgersson

Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering,
National University of Singapore,
5 Engineering Drive 2,
Singapore, 117576, Singapore

Arun S. Mujumdar

Mechanical Engineering Department,
National University of Singapore,
9 Engineering Drive 1,
Singapore, 117576, Singapore

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Advanced Energy Systems Division for publication in the JOURNAL OF FUEL CELL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY. Manuscript received September 2, 2012; final manuscript received September 7, 2012; published online November 16, 2012. Editor: Nigel M. Sammes.

J. Fuel Cell Sci. Technol 9(6), 061008 (Nov 16, 2012) (8 pages) doi:10.1115/1.4007792 History: Received September 02, 2012; Revised September 07, 2012

In open-cathode polymer electrolyte fuel cell (PEFC) stacks, a significant temperature rise can exist due to insufficient cooling, especially at higher current densities. To improve stack thermal management while reducing the cost of cooling, we propose a forced air-convection open-cathode fuel cell stack with edge cooling (fins). The impact of the edge cooling is studied via a mathematical model of the three-dimensional two-phase flow and the associated conservation equations of mass, momentum, species, energy, and charge. The model includes the stack, ambient, fan, and fins used for cooling. The model results predict better thermal management and stack performance for the proposed design as compared to the conventional open-cathode stack design, which shows potential for practical applications. Several key design parameters—fin material and fin geometry—are also investigated with regard to the stack performance and thermal management.

© 2012 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Martin, K. E., Kopasz, J. P., and McMurphy, K. W., 2010, “Status of Fuel Cells and the Challenges Facing Fuel Cell Technology Today,” Fuel Cell Chemistry and Operation (American Chemical Society Symposium Series), Vol. 1040, American Chemical Society, Washington, D.C., pp. 1–13.
Buchi, F., 2002, “Small Size PEFC Systems for Special Applications,” Handbook of Fuel Cell Technology, Vol. 4, John Wiley and Sons, New York.
Mock, P., and Schmid, S. A., 2009, “Fuel Cells for Automotive Powertrains: A Techno-Economic Assessment,” J. Power Sources, 190, pp. 133–140. [CrossRef]
James, B. D., Perez, J., Baum, K. N., Spisak, A., and Sanders, M., 2011, “Low Temperature PEM Stationary Fuel Cell System Cost Analysis,” accessed May 2012, www.fuelcellseminar.com/media/8898/lrd24-1%20james.pdf
Chu, D., and Jiang, R., 1999, “Comparative Studies of Polymer Electrolyte Membrane Fuel Cell Stack and Single Cell,” J. Power Sources, 80, pp. 226–234. [CrossRef]
Rosa, D. T. S., Pinto, D. G., Silva, V. S., Silva, R. A., and Rangel, C. M., 2007, “High Performance Stack With Open-Cathode at Ambient Pressure and Temperature Conditions,” Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 32, pp. 4350–4357. [CrossRef]
Jung, G. B., Lo, K. F., Su, A., Weng, F. B., Tu, C. H., Yang, T. F., and Chan, S. H., 2008, “Experimental Evaluation of an Ambient Forced-Feed Air-Supply PEM Fuel Cell,” Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 33, pp. 2980–2985. [CrossRef]
Yim, S. D., Sohn, Y. J., Yoon, Y. G., Um, S., Kim, C. S., and Lee, W. Y., 2008, “Operating Characteristic of 40 W Class PEMFC Stack Using Reformated Gas Under Low Humidifying Conditions,” J. Power Sources, 178, pp. 711–715. [CrossRef]
Wu, J., Galli, S., Lagana, I., Pozio, A., Monetelone, G., and Yuan, X. Z., 2009, “An Air-Cooled Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cell With Combined Oxidant and Coolant Flow,” J. Power Sources, 188, pp. 199–204. [CrossRef]
Barreras, F., Lopez, A. M., Lozano, A., and Barranco, J. E., 2011, “Experimental Study of the Pressure Drop in the Cathode Side of Air-Forced Open-Cathode Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells,” Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 36, pp. 7612–7620. [CrossRef]
Lopez, A. M., Barroso, J., Roda, V., Barranco, J., Lozano, A., and Barreras, F., 2012, “Design and Development of the Cooling System of a 2 kW Nominal Power Open-Cathode Polymer Electrolyte Fuel Cell Stack,” Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 37, pp. 7289–7298. [CrossRef]
Sasmito, A. P., Lum, K. W., Birgersson, E., and Mujumdar, A. S., 2010, “Computational Study of Forced Air-Convection in Open-Cathode Polymer Electrolyte Fuel Cell Stacks,” J. Power Sources, 195, pp. 5550–5563. [CrossRef]
Sasmito, A. P., Birgersson, E., and Mujumdar, A. S., 2011, “Numerical Evaluation of Various Thermal Management Strategies for Polymer Electrolyte Fuel Cell Stacks,” Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 36, pp. 12991–13007. [CrossRef]
Strahl, S., Husar, A., and Serra, M., 2011, “Development and Experimental Validation of a Dynamic Thermal and Water Distribution Model of an Open Cathode Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cell,” J. Power Sources, 196, pp. 4251–4263. [CrossRef]
Sasmito, A. P., Birgersson, E., Lum, K. W., and Mujumdar, A. S., 2012, “Fan Selection and Stack Design for Open-Cathode Polymer Electrolyte Fuel Cell Stacks,” Renewable Energy, 37, pp. 325–332. [CrossRef]
Sasmito, A. P., Birgersson, E., and Mujumdar, A. S., 2012, “A Novel Flow Reversal Concept for Improved Thermal Management in Polymer Electrolyte Fuel Cell Stacks,” Int. J. Therm. Sci., 54, pp. 242–252. [CrossRef]
Zhang, G., and Kandlikar, S. G., 2012, “A Critical Review of Cooling Techniques in Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cell Stacks,” Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 37, pp. 2412–2429. [CrossRef]
Wen, C. Y., and Huang, G. W., 2008, “Application of a Thermally Conductive Pyrolytic Graphite Sheet to Thermal Management of a PEM Fuel Cell,” J. Power Sources, 178, pp. 132–140. [CrossRef]
Wen, C. Y., Lin, Y. S., and Lu.C. H., 2009, “Performance of a Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cell Stack With Thermally Conductive Pyrolytic Graphite Sheets for Thermal Management,” J. Power Sources, 189, pp. 1100–1105. [CrossRef]
Wen, C. Y., Lin, Y. S., Lu, C. H., and Luo, T. W., 2011, “Thermal Management of a Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cell Stack With Pyrolytic Graphite Sheets and Fans Combined,” Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 36, pp. 6082–6089. [CrossRef]
Fluckiger, R., Tiefenauer, A., Ruge, M., Aebi, C., Wokaun, A., and Buchi, F. N., 2007, “Thermal Analysis and Optimization of a Portable Edge-Air-Cooled PEFC Stack,” J. Power Sources, 172, pp. 324–333. [CrossRef]
Sasmito, A. P., Birgersson, E., and Mujumdar, A. S., 2011, “Numerical Investigation of Liquid Water Cooling for a Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cell Stack,” Heat Transfer Eng., 32, pp. 151–167. [CrossRef]
Heinzel, A., Mahlendorf, F., and Jansen, C., 2009, “Bipolar Plates,” Fuel Cells—Proton-Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells, Elsevier, New York.

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Schematic of an open-cathode PEFC stack equipped with fins and an external fan for efficient cooling and supply of air

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Computational domain with ambient, stack, fan and fins

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

SCCs for the open-cathode fuel cell stack with a conventional design (▾), with additional air-coolant channels (), and with edge cooling (); FCC for a fan power of 19.5 W (), and operating point (○)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Comparison of the average stack temperature (···) and polarization curves (—) for the conventional open-cathode stack (▾), the open-cathode stack with additional air coolant channels (), and with edge cooling ()

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Comparison of the average stack temperature (···) and polarization curves (—) for fin materials of stainless steel (▾), expanded graphite SGL SIGRAFLEX (), and aluminum ()

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

SCCs for the open-cathode fuel cell stack edge cooling with fin thicknesses of 2 (), 1 (), and 0.5 mm (); the FCC for a fan power of 19.5 W (◀), and the operating point (○)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Comparison of the average stack temperature (···) and polarization curves (—) for fin thicknesses of 2 (), 1 (), and 0.5 mm (▾)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

SCCs for the open-cathode fuel cell stack edge cooling with fin lengths of 15 (), 30 (), and 60 mm (); the FCC for a fan power of 19.5 W (◀), and the operating point (○)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Comparison of the average stack temperature (···) and polarization curves (—) for fin lengths of 15 (), 30 (), and 60 mm (▾)

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In