0
Research Papers

Modeling Studies of Tubular SOFCs for Transportation Markets

[+] Author and Article Information
Gianfranco DiGiuseppe

e-mail: gdigiuse@kettering.edu

Naveen K. Honnagondanahalli

Kettering University,
Mechanical Engineering Department,
1700 West Third Avenue, Flint, MI 48504

Jeff Dederer

Pittsburgh Electric Engines Inc.,
402 East Main Street, Mount Pleasant, PA 15666

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Advanced Energy Systems Division of ASME for publication in the Journal of Fuel Cell Science and Technology. Manuscript received January 7, 2013; final manuscript received January 16, 2013; published online March 26, 2013. Editor: Nigel M. Sammes.

J. Fuel Cell Sci. Technol 10(2), 021009 (Mar 26, 2013) (9 pages) Paper No: FC-13-1001; doi: 10.1115/1.4023844 History: Received January 07, 2013; Revised January 16, 2013

This paper reports a new 3D isothermal, steady state electrochemical modeling study for tubular solid oxide fuel cells where the testing setup is studied in order to improve fuel distribution and geometry. For the model validation, an experimental voltage-current density curve measured in house was used. This study focuses on the cell testing setup and is used to optimize the testing geometry for improved testing conditions. The mathematical model consists of coupling fluid dynamics, electrical conduction, and diffusion physics. The model indicates that flow mal-distribution may be of concern and may affect cell performance. In addition, concentrations of current densities throughout the solid oxide fuel cell may cause some hot spots. Finally, the model is able to predict the cell voltage-current density of the cell very well when compared to experimental data.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2013 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Singhal, S. C., and Kendall, K., eds., 2003, High Temperature Solid Oxide Fuel Cells: Fundamentals, Design and Applications, Elsevier, New York.
DiGiuseppe, G., 2005, “High Power Density Cell Development at Siemens Westinghouse,” Solid Oxide Fuel Cells IX, S. C.Singhal and J.Mizusaki, eds., The Electrochemical Society Proceedings Series, Pennington, NJ, pp. 322–332.
Minh, N. Q., 1993, “Ceramic Fuel Cells,” J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 76, pp. 563–588. [CrossRef]
P.Costamagna, A., Selimovic, M., Del Borghi, M., and Agnewc, G., 2004, “Electrochemical Model of the Integrated Planar Solid Oxide Fuel Cell (IP-SOFC),” Chem. Eng. J., 102, pp. 61–69. [CrossRef]
Ni, M., Leung, K. H., and Leung, D. Y. C., 2007, “Parametric Study of Solid Oxide Fuel Cell Performance,” Energy Convers. Manage., 48, pp. 1525–1535. [CrossRef]
Chase, M. W., 1998, JANAF Thermochemical Tables, 4th ed., Vol. 9, J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data, Gaithersburg, MD.
Ma, L., Ingham, D. B., Pourkashanian, M., and Carcadea, E., 2005, “Review of the Computational Fluid Dynamics Modeling of Fuel Cells,” ASME J. Fuel Cell Sci. Technol., 2, pp. 246–257. [CrossRef]
Berning, T., Lu, D. M., and Djilali, N., 2002, “Three-Dimensional Computational Analysis of Transport Phenomena in a PEM Fuel Cell,” J. Power Sources, 106, pp. 284–294. [CrossRef]
Chan, S. H., Khor, K. A., and Xia, Z. T., 2001, “A Complete Polarization Model of a Solid Oxide Fuel Cell and Its Sensitivity to the Change of Cell Component Thickness,” J. Power Sources, 93, pp. 130–140. [CrossRef]
Prentice, G., 1990, Electrochemical Engineering Principles, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
Newman, J. S., and Thomas-Alyea, K. E., 2004, Electrochemical Systems, 3rd ed., Wiley, New York.
Kakaça, S., Pramuanjaroenkijb, A., and Zhoub, X. Y., 2007, “A Review of Numerical Modeling of Solid Oxide Fuel Cells,” Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 32, pp. 761–786. [CrossRef]
Zhu, H., Kee, R. J., Janardhanan, V. M., Deutschmann, O., and Goodwin, D. G., 2005, “Modeling Elementary Heterogeneous Chemistry and Electrochemistry in Solid-Oxide Fuel Cells,” J. Electrochem. Soc., 152, pp. A2427–A2440. [CrossRef]
Bird, R. B., Stewart, W. E., and Lightfoot, E. N., 1960, Transport Phenomena, Wiley, New York.
Todd, B., and Young, J. B., 2002, “Thermodynamic and Transport Properties of Gases for Use in Solid Oxide Fuel Cell Modelling,” J. Power Sources, 110, pp. 186–200. [CrossRef]
Zhu, H., and Kee, R. J., 2007, “The Influence of Current Collection on the Performance of Tubular Anode-Supported SOFC Cells,” J. Power Sources, 169, pp. 315–326. [CrossRef]
Zhao, F., Armstrong, T. J., and Virkar, A. V., 2003, “Measurement of O2-N2 Effective Diffusivity in Porous Media at High Temperatures Using an Electrochemical Cell,” J. Electrochem. Soc., 150, pp. A249–A256. [CrossRef]
Barbir, F., 2005, PEM Fuel Cells: Theory and Practice, Elsevier, New York.
Bessette, N. F., and Wepfer, W. J., 1996, “Prediction of On-Design and Off-Design Performance for a Solid Oxide Fuel Cell Power Module,” Energy Converse. Manage., 37, pp. 281–293. [CrossRef]
Gazzarri, J. I., and Kesler, O., 2007, “Non-Destructive Delamination Detection in Solid Oxide Fuel Cells,” J. Power Sources, 167(2), pp. 430–441. [CrossRef]

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Cell testing setup

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Picture of PEEI cells and bundle

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Schematic of the turbo fuel cell engine (TFCE) for transportation markets

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Typical meshing combination used for these modeling studies

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Volume plot of the flow field (velocity magnitude and velocity vectors) in the air and fuel side

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Air flow field inside the AFT at different conditions: (a) standard testing setup, (b) elevated AFT, (c) centered AFT, and (d) off-centered AFT

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Fuel flow field for different testing geometries: (a) standard testing geometry, (b) rounded fuel flow volume, and (c) squared fuel flow volume

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Cathode current density along a selected short cell section at 0.7 V

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Electrolyte/anode current density along a selected short cell section at 0.7 V

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Electrolyte current density along the whole cell length at 0.7 V

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Comparison of VJ obtained from COMSOL with experimental data from PEEI

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In