0
Research Paper

Effect of Channel Depth and Cell Temperature on the Performance of a Direct Methanol Fuel Cell

[+] Author and Article Information
Mousa Farhadi

e-mail: mfarhadi@nit.ac.ir

Mohsen Shakeri

Faculty of Mechanical Engineering,
Babol University of Technology,
Babol 47148-71167, Iran

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Advanced Energy Systems Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF FUEL CELL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY. Manuscript received December 7, 2009; final manuscript received January 15, 2013; published online May 14, 2013. Editor: Nigel M. Sammes.

J. Fuel Cell Sci. Technol 10(3), 031002 (May 14, 2013) (6 pages) Paper No: FC-09-1107; doi: 10.1115/1.4024151 History: Received December 07, 2009; Revised January 15, 2013

The main goal of this study is to analyze the performance of the direct methanol single cell using three channel depths at various cell temperatures. The membrane electrode assembly (MEA) used Nafion® 117, by loading a Pt-Ru (4 mg/cm2) catalyst at the anode and Pt-black (4 mg/cm2) catalyst at the cathode. The active area of the MEA was 100 cm (Jung et al., 2009, “Investigation of Flow Bed Design in Direct Methanol Fuel Cell,” J. Solid State Electrochem., 13, pp. 1455–1465). In these sets of experiments, anode and cathode channel depth were varied simultaneously. The cell performance is improved with an increase of temperature in a certain range because the conductivity of the membrane and the reaction kinetics at both the anode and cathode are increased. Also, when the channel depth of the bipolar plate is decreased from 2.0 to 1.0 mm, the cell performance increases. The decreased channel depth leads to an increase in the linear velocity of reactants and products.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2013 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Okajima, K., Suetake, M., Furukawa, K., and Sudoh, M., 2002, “Performance of Liquid-Feed Direct Methanol Fuel Cell at Room Temperature,” J. Electrochem., 74, pp. 186.
Jung, G., Tu, C., Chi, P., Su, A., Weng, F., Lin, Y., Chiang, Y., Lee, C., and Yan, W., 2009, “Investigation of Flow Bed Design in Direct Methanol Fuel Cell,” J. Solid State Electrochem., 13, pp. 1455–1465. [CrossRef]
Garcia, B. L., Sethuraman, V. A., Weidner, J. W., White, R. E., and Dougal, R., 2004, “Mathematical Model of a Direct Methanol Fuel Cell,” ASME J. Fuel Cell Sci. Technol., 1, pp. 43–48. [CrossRef]
Jung, G.-B., Su, A., Tu, C.-H., and Weng, F.-B., 2005, “Effect of Operating Parameters on the DMFC Performance,” ASME J. Fuel Cell Sci. Technol., 2, pp. 81–85. [CrossRef]
Wang, M., Guo, H., and Ma, C., 2006, “Dynamic Characteristics of a Direct Methanol Fuel Cell,” ASME J. Fuel Cell Sci. Technol., 3, pp. 202–207. [CrossRef]
Casalegno, A., Marchesi, R., and Rinaldi, F., 2007, “Systematic Experimental Analysis of a Direct Methanol Fuel Cell,” ASME J. Fuel Cell Sci. Technol., 4, pp. 418–424. [CrossRef]
Lee, M.-S., Chen, L.-J., Hung, M.-F., Lo, M.-Y., Sue, S.-J., Lo, C.-H., and Wang, Y.-P., 2008, “A Novel Design of a Cylindrical Portable Direct Methanol Fuel Cell,” ASME J. Fuel Cell Sci. Technol., 5, p. 031004. [CrossRef]
Kuan, Y.-D., Lee, S.-M., and Sung, M.-F., 2009, “The Cathode Airflow Effect on the Direct Methanol Fuel Cell From Single Cell to a Planar Module,” ASME J. Fuel Cell Sci. Technol., 6, p. 011004. [CrossRef]
Hwang, Y.-S., Cha, S.-W., Choi, H., Lee, D.-Y., and Kim, S. Y., 2009, “Influence of Flow Channel Design on the Flow Pressure Drop and the Performance of Direct Methanol Fuel Cells,” ASME J. Fuel Cell Sci. Technol., 6, p. 011023. [CrossRef]
Oliveira, V. B., Rangel, C. M., and Pinto, A. M. F. R., 2011, “Performance of a Direct Methanol Fuel Cell Operating Close to Room Temperature,” ASME J. Fuel Cell Sci. Technol., 8, p. 011009. [CrossRef]
Jung, D., Lee, C., Kim, C., and Shin, D., 1998, “Performance of a Direct Methanol Polymer Electrolyte Fuel Cell,” J. Power Sources, 71, pp. 169–173. [CrossRef]
Ge, J., and Liu, H., 2005, “Experimental Studies of a Direct Methanol Fuel Cell,” J. Power Sources, 142, pp. 56–69. [CrossRef]
Wong, C., Zhao, T., Ye, Q., and Liu, J., 2006, “Experimental Investigation of the Anode Flow Field of a Micro Direct Methanol Fuel Cell,” J. Power Sources, 155, pp. 291–296. [CrossRef]
Amphlett, J., Peppley, B., Halliop, E., and Sadig, A., 2001, “The Effect of Anode Flow Characteristics and Temperature on the Performance of a Direct Methanol Fuel Cell,” J. Power Sources, 96, pp. 204–213. [CrossRef]
Guo, H., Ma, C., Wang, M., Ye, F., Wang, Y., and Wang, C., 2004, “Experimental Investigation of Flow Bed Design on Performance of Liquid Feed Direct Methanol Fuel Cells,” J. Fuel Cell, 4(1–2), pp. 86–89. [CrossRef]
Hwang, S., Joh, H., Scibioh, M., Lee, S., and Kim, S., 2008, “Impact of Cathode Channel Depth on Performance of Direct Methanol Fuel Cell,” J. Power Sources, 183, pp. 226–231. [CrossRef]
Omran, M. P., Farhadi, M., and Sedighi, K., 2011, “The Effect of Cell Temperature and Channel Geometry on the Performance of a Direct Methanol Fuel Cell,” ASME J. Fuel Cell Sci. Technol., 8, p. 061004. [CrossRef]
Kulikovsky, A. A., 2008, “Optimal Temperature for DMFC Stack Operation,” Electrochim. Acta, 53(22), pp. 6391–6396. [CrossRef]
Baglio, V., Stassi, A., Matera, F. V., Di Blasi, A., Antonucci, V., and Aricò, A. S., 2008, “Optimization of Properties and Operating Parameters of a Passive DMFC Mini-Stack at Ambient Temperature,” J. Power Sources, 180(2), pp. 797–802. [CrossRef]
Hashim, N., Kamarudin, S. K., and Daud, W. R. W., 2009, “Design, Fabrication and Testing of a PMMA-Based Passive Single-Cell and a Multi-Cell Stack Micro-DMFC,” Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 34(19), pp. 8263–8269. [CrossRef]
Zhu, Y., Liang, J., Liu, C., Ma, T., and Wang, L., 2009, “Development of a Passive Direct Methanol Fuel Cell (DMFC) Twin-Stack for Long-Term Operation,” J. Power Sources, 193(2), pp. 649–655. [CrossRef]
Baglio, V., Stassi, A., Matera, F. V., Antonucci, V., and Aricò, A. S., 2009, “Investigation of Passive DMFC Mini-Stacks at Ambient Temperature,” Electrochim. Acta, 54(7), pp. 2004–2009. [CrossRef]
Baglio, V., Stassi, A., Matera, F. V., Kim, H., Antonucci, V., and Aricò, A. S., 2010, “AC-Impedance Investigation of Different MEA Configurations for Passive-Mode DMFC Mini-Stack Applications,” Fuel Cells, 10(1), pp. 124–131. [CrossRef]
Kuan, Y., Lee, S., and Sung, M., 2009, “Experimental Study on the Characterization of Airflow Effect on the Direct Methanol Fuel Cell,” Renewable Energy, 34, pp. 1962–1968. [CrossRef]
Barbir, F., 2005, PEM Fuel Cells: Theory and Practice, Elsevier Academic Press, Burlington, VT.

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Experimental setup

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

(a) Voltage and (b) power density versus current density at different temperatures. Channel depth 1.0 mm, methanol concentration 1.0 M, methanol flow rate 10.0 ml/min, oxygen flow rate 2.0 slpm, cathode back pressure 0.5 bar.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

(a) Voltage and (b) power density versus current density at different temperatures. Channel depth 1.5 mm, methanol concentration 1.0 M, methanol flow rate 10.0 ml/min, oxygen flow rate 2.0 slpm, cathode back pressure 0.5 bar.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

(a) Voltage and (b) power density versus current density at different temperatures. Channel depth 2.0 mm, methanol concentration 1.0 M, methanol flow rate 10.0 ml/min, oxygen flow rate 2.0 slpm, cathode back pressure 0.5 bar.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Single cell voltage as a function of single cell operating temperature at different current density (channel depth = 1.0 mm)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Single cell voltage as a function of single cell operating temperature at different current density (channel depth = 1.5 mm)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Single cell voltage as a function of single cell operating temperature at different current density (channel depth = 2.0 mm)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Voltage-current density curve. Cell temperature 40 °C, methanol concentration 1.0 M, methanol flow rate 10.0 ml/min, oxygen flow rate 2.0 slpm, cathode back pressure 0.5 bar.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Voltage-current density curve. Cell temperature 65 °C, methanol concentration 1.0 M, methanol flow rate 10.0 ml/min, oxygen flow rate 2.0 slpm, cathode back pressure 0.5 bar.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Power density-current density curve. Cell temperature 50 °C, methanol concentration 1.0 M, methanol flow rate 10.0 ml/min, oxygen flow rate 2.0 slpm, cathode back pressure 0.5 bar.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Power density-current density curve. Cell temperature 60 °C, methanol concentration 1.0 M, methanol flow rate 10.0 ml/min, oxygen flow rate 2.0 slpm, cathode back pressure 0.5 bar.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Effect of channel depth on voltage, cell temperature 60 °C, methanol concentration 1.0 M, methanol flow rate 10.0 ml/min, oxygen flow rate 2.0 slpm, cathode back pressure 0.5 bar

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Effect of channel depth on current density, cell temperature 60 °C, methanol concentration 1.0 M, methanol flow rate 10.0 ml/min, oxygen flow rate 2.0 slpm, cathode back pressure 0.5 bar

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Effect of channel depth on the peak power density with 1.0 M methanol fed at 10.0 ml/min, oxygen flow rate 2.0 slpm, and cathode pressure 0.5 bar

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In