0
Research Paper

Uniformity Analysis in Different Flow-Field Configurations of Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cell

[+] Author and Article Information
Yok-Sheung Li

Department of Civil and Structural Engineering,
The Hong Kong Polytechnic University,
Kowloon, Hong Kong 00852, China

Yi Han

Department of Civil and Structural Engineering,
The Hong Kong Polytechnic University,
Kowloon, Hong Kong 00852, China;
Department of Applied Mechanics and Engineering,
SunYat-sen University,
Guangzhou 510275, China

Jie-Min Zhan

Department of Applied Mechanics and Engineering,
SunYat-sen University,
Guangzhou 510275, China
e-mail: stszjm@mail.sysu.edu.cn;
cejmzhan@gmail.com

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Advanced Energy Systems Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF FUEL CELL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY. Manuscript received May 1, 2012; final manuscript received February 2, 2013; published online May 14, 2013. Editor: Nigel M. Sammes.

J. Fuel Cell Sci. Technol 10(3), 031003 (May 14, 2013) (10 pages) Paper No: FC-12-1035; doi: 10.1115/1.4024252 History: Received May 01, 2012; Revised February 02, 2013

Knowledge of the distributions of various properties within a proton exchange membrane (PEM) fuel cell is a prerequisite for the improvement of cell performance, stability, and durability. In this paper, statistical tools are employed to investigate the variations of the current density, membrane water content, and local temperature in six flow-field configurations of PEM fuel cells, utilizing a three-dimensional two-phase multicomponent model. Under the same operating conditions, although the polarizations of the cells are similar, the results show that the extent of the uniformity of different physical properties varies in different flow-field configurations. Due to the proper distributions of reactants, the current density, membrane water content, and temperature in channel-perpendicular flow-fields are distributed more uniformly than in channel-overlapping ones. Furthermore, for all flow-field configurations, the three physical properties showed better uniformity in cases with fewer cathodic serpentine channels than in cases with more channels. These results reveal that a uniformity analysis using statistical tools is useful for a comparison of the merits of different configurations of PEM fuel cells.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2013 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Jeon, D. H., Greenway, S., Shimpalee, S., and Van Zee, J. W., 2008, “The Effect of Serpentine Flow-Field Designs on PEM Fuel Cell Performance,” Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 33, pp. 1052–1066. [CrossRef]
Wieser, Ch., Helmbold, A., and Gulzow, E., 2000, “A New Technique for Two-Dimensional Current Distribution Measurements in Electrochemical Cells,” J. Appl. Electrochem., 30, pp. 803–807. [CrossRef]
Stumper, J., Campbell, S. A., and Wilkinson, D. P., 1998, “In-Situ Method for the Determination of Current Distribution in PEM Fuel Cells,” Electrochim. Acta, 43, pp. 3773–3783. [CrossRef]
Cleghorn, S. J., Derouin, C. R., Wilson, M. S., and Gotterfeld, S., 1998, “A Printed Circuit Board Approach to Measuring Current Distribution in a Fuel Cell,” J. Appl. Electrochem., 28, pp. 663–672. [CrossRef]
Geiger, A. B., Eckl, R., Wokaun, A., and Scherer, G. G., 2004, “An Approach to Measuring Locally Resolved Currents in Polymer Electrolyte Fuel Cells,” J. Electrochem. Soc., 151(3), pp. A394–A398. [CrossRef]
Noponen, M., Mennola, T., Mikkola, M., Hottinen, T., and Lund, P., 2002, “Measurement of Current Distribution in a Free-Breathing PEMFC,” J. Power Sources, 106, pp. 304–312. [CrossRef]
Mench, M. M., Wang, C. Y., and Ishikawa, M., 2003, “In Situ Current Distribution Measurements in Polymer Electrolyte Fuel Cells,” J. Electrochem. Soc., 150, pp. A1052–A1059. [CrossRef]
Hakenjos, A., Muenter, H., Wittstadt, U., and Hebling, C., 2004, “A PEM Fuel Cell for Combined Measurement of Current and Temperature Distribution, and Flow Field Flooding,” J. Power Sources, 131, pp. 213–216. [CrossRef]
Weng, F. B., Jou, B. S., Li, C. W., Su, A., and Chan, S. H., 2008, “The Effect of Low Humidity on the Uniformity and Stability of Segmented PEM Fuel Cells,” J. Power Sources, 181, pp. 251–258. [CrossRef]
Sun, H., Zhang, G. S., Guo, L. J., and Liu, H. T., 2006, “A Novel Technique for Measuring Current Distributions in PEM Fuel Cells,” J. Power Sources, 158, pp. 326–332. [CrossRef]
Matian, M., Marquis, A. J., and Brandon, N. P., 2010, “Application of Thermal Imaging to Validate a Heat Transfer Model for Polymer Electrolyte Fuel Cells,” Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 35(22), pp. 12308–12316. [CrossRef]
Schimoi, R., Masude, M., Fushinobu, K., Kozawa, Y., and Okazaki, K., 2004, “Visualization of the Membrane Temperature Field of a Polymer Electrolyte Fuel Cell,” ASME J. Energy Resour. Technol., 126, pp. 258–261. [CrossRef]
Wang, M. H., Guo, H., and Ma, C. F., 2006, “Temperature Distribution on the MEA Surface of a PEMFC With Serpentine Channel Flow Bed,” J. Power Sources, 157, pp. 181–187. [CrossRef]
Adzic, M., Heiter, M. V., and Santos, D., 1997, “Design of Dedicated Instrumentation for Temperature Distribution Measurements in Solid Oxide Fuel Cells,” J. Appl. Electrochem., 27, pp. 1355–1361. [CrossRef]
Mench, M., Burford, D. J., and Davis, T. W., 2003, “In-Situ Temperature Distribution Measurement in an Operating Polymer Electrolyte Fuel Cell,” ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, Washington, DC, November 15–21, ASME Paper No. IMECE2003-42393, pp. 415–428. [CrossRef]
Bazylak, A., 2009, “Liquid Water Visualization in PEM Fuel Cells: A Review,” Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 34, pp. 3845–3857. [CrossRef]
Ludlow, D., Calebrese, C., Yu, S., Dannehy, C., Jacobson, D., and Hussey, D., 2006, “PEM Fuel Cell Membrane Hydration Measurement by Neutron Imaging,” J. Power Sources, 162, pp. 271–278. [CrossRef]
Shimpalee, S., Greenway, S., and Van Zee, J. W., 2006, “The Impact of Channel Path Length on PEMFC Flow-Field Design,” J. Power Sources, 160, pp. 398–406. [CrossRef]
Cha, S. W., O'Hayre, R., Saito, Y., and Prinz, F. B., 2004, “The Scaling Behavior of Flow Patterns: A Model Investigation,” J. Power Sources, 134, pp. 57–71. [CrossRef]
Lee, S., Jeong, H., Ahn, B., Lim, T., and Son, Y., 2008, “Parametric Study of the Channel Design at the Bipolar Plate in PEMFC Performances,” Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 33, pp. 5691–5696. [CrossRef]
Wang, C. T., Hu, Y. C., and Zheng, P. L., 2010, “Novel Biometric Flow Slab Design for Improvement of PEMFC Performance,” Appl Energy, 87, pp. 1366–1375. [CrossRef]
Wang, X. D., Yan, W. M., Duan, Y. Y., Weng, F. B., Jung, G. B., and Lee, C. Y., 2010, “Numerical Study on Channel Size Effect for Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cell With Serpentine Flow Field,” Energy Convers. Manage., 51, pp. 959–968. [CrossRef]
Shimpalee, S., Greenway, S., Spuckler, D., and Van Zee, J. W., 2004, “Predicting Water and Current Distributions in a Commercial-Size PEMFC,” J. Power Sources, 135, pp. 79–87. [CrossRef]
Shimpalee, S., and Van Zee, J. W., 2007, “Numerical Studies on Rib and Channel Dimension of Flow-Field on PEMFC Performance,” Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 32, pp. 842–856. [CrossRef]
Sinha, P. K., Wang, C. Y., and Su, A., 2007, “Optimization of Gas Diffusion Media for Elevated Temperature Polymer Electrolyte Fuel Cells,” Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 32, pp. 886–894. [CrossRef]
Han, Y., and Zhan, J. M., 2010, “The Impact of Channel Assembled Angle on Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cell Performance,” J. Power Sources, 195, pp. 6586–6597. [CrossRef]
Berning, T., Lu, D., and Djilali, N., 2003, “Three-Dimensional Computational Analysis of Transport Phenomena in a PEM Fuel Cell,” J. Power Sources, 134, pp. 440–452. [CrossRef]
Springer, T. E., Zawodzinski, T. A., and Gottesfeld, S., 1991, “Polymer Electrolyte Fuel Cell Model,” J. Electrochem. Soc., 138, pp. 2334–2342. [CrossRef]
Wang, X. D., Zhang, X. X., Yan, W. M., Lee, D. J., and Su, A., 2009, “Determination of the Optimal Active Area for Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells With Parallel, Interdigitated or Serpentine Designs,” Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 34, pp. 3823–3832. [CrossRef]
Mazumder, S., and Cole, J. V., 2003, “Rigorous 3-D Mathematical Modeling of PEM Fuel Cells II. Model Predictions With Liquid Water Transport,” J. Electrochem. Soc., 150, pp. A1510–A1517. [CrossRef]
Shimpalee, S., Spuckler, D., and Van Zee, J. W., 2007, “Prediction of Transient Response for a 25-cm2 PEM Fuel Cell,” J. Power Sources, 167, pp. 130–138. [CrossRef]
Wang, X. D., Duan, Y. Y., Yan, W. M., Lee, D. J., Su, A., and Chi, P. H., 2009, “Channel Aspect Ratio Effect for Serpentine Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cell: Role of Sub-Rib Convection,” J. Power Sources, 193, pp. 684–690. [CrossRef]
Nam, J. H., and Karviany, M., 2003, “Effective Diffusivity and Water-Saturation Distribution in Single- and Two-Layer PEMFC Diffusion Medium,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 46, pp. 4595–4611. [CrossRef]
Ticianelli, E. A., Derouin, C. R., Redondo, A., and Srinivasan, S., 1988, “Methods to Advance Technology of Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells,” J. Electrochem. Soc., 135, pp. 2209–2214. [CrossRef]
Wang, L., Husar, A., Zhou, T., and Liu, H., 2003, “A Parametric Study of PEM Fuel Cell Performances,” Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 28, pp. 1263–1272. [CrossRef]
Büchi, F. N., and Scherer, G. G., 2001, “Investigation of the Transversal Water Profile in Nafion Membranes in Polymer Electrolyte Fuel Cells,” J. Electrochem. Soc., 148, pp. A183–A188. [CrossRef]

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

(a) Definition of the channel assembled angle, (b) 1-channel serpentine flow-field pattern, (c) 2-channel serpentine flow-field pattern, and (d) 3-channel serpentine flow-field pattern

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Comparison of the experimental and simulated polarization curves

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Polarization and power density curves of the six flow-fields

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Standard deviation of the current density on the membrane surface

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Current density (A cm−2) distributions on the membrane surface at Iavg = 700 mA cm−2

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Current density (A cm−2) distributions on the membrane surface at Iavg = 1000 mA cm−2

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Maximum difference of the current density on the membrane surface

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

(a) Average membrane water content of the six flow-fields, and (b) standard deviation of the membrane water content of the six flow-fields

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Membrane water content distributions on the membrane surface at Iavg = 1000 mA cm−2

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

(a) Average temperature on the anode membrane surface of the six flow-fields, and (b) standard deviation of the temperature on the anode membrane surface of the six flow-fields

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Local temperature (K) distributions on the anode membrane surface at Iavg = 1000 mA cm−2

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In