0
Research Paper

Maximum Power Point Tracking With Reactant Flow Optimization of Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cell

[+] Author and Article Information
Nabil Karami

e-mail: nabil.karami@lsis.org

Rachid Outbib

e-mail: rachid.outbib@lsis.org
Laboratory of Sciences in Information
and Systems (LSIS),
Aix-Marseille University,
Marseille 13 013, France

Nazih Moubayed

Department of Electricity and Electronics,
Faculty of Engineering 1,
Lebanese University,
Tripoli, Lebanon
e-mail: nmoubayed@ieee.org

Π(x) designates the set of all species at electrode x, i.e., Π(anode) = {H2, vapor (v)} and Π(cathode) = {O2, N2, air (a), vapor (v)}.

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Advanced Energy Systems Division of ASME for publication in the Journal of Fuel Cell Science and Technology. Manuscript received May 21, 2013; final manuscript received July 6, 2013; published online August 20, 2013. Editor: Nigel M. Sammes.

J. Fuel Cell Sci. Technol 10(5), 051008 (Aug 20, 2013) (14 pages) Paper No: FC-13-1055; doi: 10.1115/1.4024967 History: Received May 21, 2013; Revised July 06, 2013

In this paper, a fuel cell (FC) maximum power point tracking (MPPT) with fuel flow optimization is presented. The aim of this study is to extract the maximum power from a FC at different fuel flow rates and to protect the FC from over-current and voltage collapse across terminals. The system is composed of a tracker with a buck converter able to change the output impedance of the FC and therefore its power. In order to illustrate our approach, the tracker is simulated by using both static and dynamic FC models to describe the FC response. Simulation results show the behavior of the tracker at different fuel and oxidant flow rates and verify the concept of maximum power tracking.

Copyright © 2013 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

FC system scheme with MPPT

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

FC equivalent dynamic circuit model

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Anode and cathode mass flows

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Electrode flow model. x ∈ {anode, cathode} and e ∈ Π(x)1

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Power curve and its derivative with respect to IFC

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Intersection of the curve dVFC/dIFC and the curve VFC/IFC at Iop

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Block diagram of static FC model with MPPT

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Block diagram of dynamic FC model with MPPT

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Complete system with static FC model

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 17

Power and voltage curves versus current

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 20

Control scheme for real application

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Variation of voltage, current, power and duty cycle at (a) 5 lpm, (b) 15 lpm, (c) 23.46 lpm

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Power and voltage variation versus current at (a) 5 lpm, (b) 15 lpm, (c) 23.46 lpm

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

MPPT with fuel flow control

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Power and voltage at MPP

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 15

Complete system with a dynamic FC model

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 16

Dynamic variation of voltage, current, and power at different hydrogen and oxygen flows

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 18

Oscillation of power point over different power curves

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 19

A possible power-tracking error

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In