Research Paper

Development of a Hybrid System of Molten Carbonate Fuel Cell and Homogeneous Charge Compression Ignition Engine for Distributed Power Generation

[+] Author and Article Information
Han Ho Song

e-mail: hhsong@snu.ac.kr

Seung Jin Song

School of Mechanical and
Aerospace Engineering,
Seoul National University,
Gwanak-gu, Seoul, South Korea

Sang Gyu Kang

Korea Institute of Machinery and Materials,
104 Sinseongno,
Yuseong-Gu, Daejon, South Korea

One may consider re-equilibration of the mixture composition and accompanying temperature change by applying WGSR in the nonisothermal component, but the overall result would change little if the size of the segment is chosen to be sufficiently small.

The choice of fuel utilization factor of 0.7 is to ensure the maximum fuel utilization in the fuel cell without sacrificing the efficiency due to increased overvoltage from depletion of fuel concentration in the latter part of the fuel cell.

By omitting the pumping losses from gas exchange processes, it may lead to slight overestimation of work output and efficiency of the engine cycle, but the present results are still reflecting on general trends as can be found in typical HCCI engine operations.

The lean flammability limits for CO and H2 are equivalence ratios of 0.34 and 0.14, respectively. For instance, the equivalence ratios of CO and H2 for the engine inlet at design point operation (referring to state 8 in Table 6) are 0.31 and 0.04, respectively, both of which are under the flammability limit.

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Advanced Energy Systems Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF FUEL CELL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY. Manuscript received November 19, 2012; final manuscript received July 10, 2013; published online September 13, 2013. Assoc. Editor: Umberto Desideri.

J. Fuel Cell Sci. Technol 10(6), 061002 (Sep 13, 2013) (11 pages) Paper No: FC-12-1116; doi: 10.1115/1.4025126 History: Received November 19, 2012; Revised July 10, 2013

A new hybrid system of molten carbonate fuel cell (MCFC) and homogenous charge compression ignition (HCCI) engine is suggested to improve the overall system efficiency and performance. In the proposed system, the catalytic burner in a standalone MCFC system is replaced with the HCCI engine. The HCCI engine is chosen over conventional spark-ignition or compression-ignition engines since it has been demonstrated to operate with highly diluted reactant mixture, which is suitable to run directly with the MCFC anode off-gas. A nonisothermal numerical model that incorporates major fuel cell losses is developed to predict the fuel cell performance. The fuel cell model assumes parallel anode and cathode flow configuration with LiNaCO3 as an electrolyte. It is integrated with an in-house HCCI engine model to investigate the hybrid system performance. At the selected design point operation around 300 kW power output, the maximum hybrid system efficiency is 21.2% (relative) higher than that of a standalone fuel cell system and, thus, achieving around 60% overall, which demonstrates the potential of the suggested hybrid system as a highly-efficient distributed power generation source in the near future.

Copyright © 2013 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


James, R., 1999, Fuel Cell Technology: An Alternative Energy System for the Future, U.S. Department of Energy, Federal Energy Technology Center, Morgantown, WV.
Tarman, P. B., 1996, “Fuel Cells for Distributed Power Generation,” J. Power Sources, 61, pp. 87–89. [CrossRef]
Campanari, S., and Iora, P., 2007, “Development of a Three-Dimensional Molten Carbonate Fuel Cell Model and Application to Hybrid Cycle Simulations,” ASME J. Fuel Cell Sci. Tech., 4, pp. 501–510. [CrossRef]
Lunghi, P., Ubertini, S., and Desideri, U., 2000, “Highly Efficient Electricity Generation Through a Hybrid Molten Carbonate Fuel Cell-Closed Loop Gas Turbine Plant,” Energy Convers. Manage., 42, pp. 1657–1672. [CrossRef]
Lobachyov, K. V., and Richter, H. R., 1998, “An Advanced Integrated Biomass Gasification and Molten Fuel Cell Power System,” Energy Convers. Manage., 39, pp. 1931–1943. [CrossRef]
Yoshiba, F., Izaki, Y., and Watanabe, T., 2004, “System Calculation of Integrated Coal Gasification/Molten Carbonate Fuel Cell Combined Cycle,” J. Power Sources, 132, pp. 52–58. [CrossRef]
Campanari, S., Chiesa, P., and Manzolini, G., 2010, “CO2 Capture From Combined Cycles Integrated With Molten Carbonate Fuel Cells,” Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control, 4, pp. 441–451. [CrossRef]
Angelino, G., and di Paliano, P. C., 2000, “Organic Rankine Cycles (ORCs) for Energy Recovery From Molten Carbonate Fuel Cells,” 35th Intersociety Energy Conversion Engineering Conference and Exhibit, Las Vegas, NV, July 24–28, pp. 1400–1409. [CrossRef]
Sanchez, D., Chacartegui, R., Torres, M., and Sanchez, T., 2009, “Stirling Based Fuel Cell Hybrid Systems: An Alternative for Molten Carbonate Fuel Cells,” J. Power Sources, 192, pp. 84–93. [CrossRef]
Munoz de Escalona, J. M., Sanchez, D., Chacartegui, R., and Sanchez, T., 2013, “Performance Analysis of Hybrid Systems Incorporating High-Temperature Fuel Cells and Closed Cycle Heat Engines at Part-Load Operation,” Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 38, pp. 570–578. [CrossRef]
Caton, P. A., 2005, “Residual-Effected Homogeneous Charge Compression Ignition Using Variable Vale Actuation,” Ph.D. thesis, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
He, W., 1994, “A Simulation Model for Integrated Molten Carbonate Fuel Cell Systems,” J. Power Sources, 49, pp. 283–290. [CrossRef]
Standaert, F., Hemmes, K., and Woudstra, N., 1996, “Analytical Fuel Cell Modeling,” J. Power Sources, 63, pp. 221–234. [CrossRef]
Standaert, F., Hemmes, K., and Woudstra, N., 1998, “Analytical Fuel Cell Modeling; Non-Isothermal Fuel Cells,” J. Power Sources, 70, pp. 181–199. [CrossRef]
Yoshiba, F., Abe, T., and Watanabe, T., 2000, “Numerical Analysis of Molten Carbonate Fuel Cell Stack Performance: Diagnosis of Internal Conditions Using Cell Voltage Profiles,” J. Power Sources, 87, pp. 21–27. [CrossRef]
Koh, J.-H., Seo, H.-K., Yoo, Y.-S., and Lim, H. C., 2002, “Consideration of Numerical Simulation Parameters and Heat Transfer Models for a Molten Carbonate Fuel Cell Stack,” J. Chem. Eng., 87, pp. 367–379. [CrossRef]
Morita, H., Komoda, M., Mugikura, Y., Izaki, Y., Watanabe, T., Masuda, Y., and Matsuyama, T., 2002, “Performance Analysis of Molten Carbonate Fuel Cell Using a Li/Na Electrolyte, J. Power Sources, 112, pp. 509–518. [CrossRef]
Baranak, M. and Atakul, H., 2007, “A Basic Model for Analysis of Molten Carbonate Fuel Cell Behavior,” J. Power Sources, 172, pp. 831–839. [CrossRef]
Kordesch, K., and Simader, G., 1996, Fuel Cells and Their Applications, VCH, New York, pp. 111–113.
Serauskas, B., Frenklach, M., Bowman, T., Smith, G., and Gardiner, B., 2013, “GRI-Mech™,” The Gas Research Institute (GRI), Chicago, IL, http://www.me.berkeley.edu/gri-mech/
FuelCell Energy, Inc., 2007, “DFC300MA™ Standard Powerplant Specification Summary,” White Paper, Fuel Cell Energy. Available at http://www.fuelcellenergy.com/assets/Specification-Summary1.pdf
Song, H. H., and Edwards, C. F., 2009, “Understanding Chemical Effects in Low-Load-Limit Extension of Homogeneous Charge Compression Ignition Engines Via Recompression Reaction,” Int J. Engine Res., 10(4), pp. 231–250. [CrossRef]
Song, H. H., Padmanabhan, A., Kaahaaina, N. B., and Edwards, C. F., 2009, “Experimental Study of Recompression Reaction for Low-Load Operation in Direct-Injection Homogeneous Charge Compression Ignition Engines With N-Heptane and I-Octane Fuels,” Int. J. Engine Res., 10(4), pp. 215–230. [CrossRef]
Ministry of Commerce, Industry and Energy, 1999, “Development of a 100kW Externally Reforming Molten Carbonate Fuel Cell System (Phase I: 25kW Class),” Republic of Korea, pp. 397–406.
Heywood, J. B., 1988, Internal Combustion Engine Fundamentals, McGraw-Hill, Columbus, OH.


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

MCFC stack modeling schematic (a) parallel flows with 25 segments and (b) energy flows within each segment

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

(a) Standalone system (with catalytic burner), (b) hybrid system (with HCCI engine)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Change in temperature along fuel cell segments

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Change in molar flow rates of anode species along fuel cell segments

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Change in molar flow rates of cathode species along fuel cell segments

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Species flows in MCFC stack (N2 and H2O omitted at cathode)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Temperature profile for HCCI engine at design point operation

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Pressure profile for HCCI engine at design point operation




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In