0
Research Paper

1-Hexanol Based Catalyst Inks for Catalyst Layer Preparation for a DMFC

[+] Author and Article Information
D. Stolten

Institute of Energy and Climate Research,
Fuel Cells (IEK-3)
Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH
Jülich 52425, Germany

Contributed by the Advanced Energy Systems Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF FUEL CELL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY. Manuscript received July 17, 2012; final manuscript received July 29, 2013; published online October 10, 2013. Assoc. Editor: Umberto Desideri.

J. Fuel Cell Sci. Technol 10(6), 061008 (Oct 10, 2013) (6 pages) Paper No: FC-12-1065; doi: 10.1115/1.4025519 History: Received July 17, 2012; Revised July 29, 2013

The catalyst ink preparation for a catalyst layer production by screen printing for a direct methanol fuel cell (DMFC) is evaluated. Among a large variety of solvents 1-hexanol was chosen for the preparation due to its properties fitting the requirements for the ink preparation. 1-hexanol based catalyst inks lead to thicker catalyst layers compared to isopropyl-/propylalcohol based catalyst inks, currently used in-house. Despite showing different layer properties, MEAs based on 1-hexanol or isopropyl-/propylalcohol based catalyst layers show comparable electrochemical performances. When using 1-hexanol based catalyst inks the dispersion procedure shows great influence on the outcoming catalyst layer. Long dispersion periods and a medium power output of ultrasonication of the catalyst dispersion are beneficial and lead to good coating qualities of the catalyst layer and therefore to high electrochemical performances.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2013 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Birry, L., Bock, C., Xue, X., McMillan, R., and MacDougall, B., 2009, “DMFC Electrode Preparation, Performance and Proton Conductivity Measurements,” J. Appl. Electrochem., 39, pp. 347–360. [CrossRef]
Jacksch, C., 2005, “Development of a Process for the Industrial Production of Electrodes for Polymer Electrolyte Membrane Fuel Cells,” Ph.D. thesis, University of Clausthal, Clausthal-Zellerfeld, Germany.
Ihm, J., and Ryu, H., 2004, “High Performance of Electrode With Low Pt Loading Prepared by Simplified Direct Screen Printing Process in PEM Fuel Cells,” J. Mater. Sci., 39, pp. 4647–4649. [CrossRef]
Stolz, S., 2003, “Screen Printing of Electro-Conductive Ceramics for the Development of Heatable Microcomponents,” Ph.D. thesis, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Lin, H., Chang, C., Hwu, W., and Ger, M., 2008, “The Rheological Behaviours of Screen-Printing Pastes,” J. Mater. Process. Technol., 197, pp. 284–291. [CrossRef]
Rohland, B., 2008, “Verfahren zur Herstellung einer Membran- Elektroden- Einheit und deren Verwendung,” German Patent DE 10141647 B4.
Sung, K., Jung, H., Kim, W., Cho, K., 2007, “Influence of Dispersion Solvent for Catalyst Ink Containing Sulfonated (Ether Ether Ketone) on Cathode Behaviour in a Direct Methanol Fuel Cell,” J. Power Sources, 169, pp. 271–275. [CrossRef]
Uchida, M., and Aoyama, Y., 1995, “New Preparation Method for Polymer-Electrolyte Fuel Cell,” J. Electrochem. Soc., 142(2), pp. 463–468. [CrossRef]
Shin, S., Lee, J., Ha, H., Hong, S., Chun, H., and Oh, I., 2002, “Effect of the Catalytic Ink Preparation Method on the Performance of Polymer Electrolyte Membrane Fuel Cells,” J. Power Sources, 106, pp. 146–152. [CrossRef]
Chisaka, M., Matsuoka, E., and Daiguji, H., 2010, “Effect of Organic Solvents on the Pore Structure of Catalyst Layers in Polymer Electrolyte Membrane Fuel Cells,” J. Electrochem. Soc., 157, pp. B1218–B1221. [CrossRef]
Kim, J., Ha, H., and Oh, I., 2004, “Influence of the Solvent in Anode Catalyst Ink on the Performance of a Direct Methanol Fuel Cell,” J. Power Sources, 135, pp. 29–35. [CrossRef]
Therdtianwong, A., and Ekdharmasuit, P., 2010, “Fabrication and Performance of Membrane Electrode Assembly Prepared by a Catalyst-Coated Membrane Method: Effect of Solvents Used in a Catalyst Ink Mixture,” Energy Fuels, 24, pp. 1191–1196. [CrossRef]
Banaszek.R., 2004, “Reproduzierbare Herstellung von Anoden für die DMFC unter Verwendung anorganischer Additive,” Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Report No. iwv3/16012.
Tsoukleris, D., Arabatzis, I., Chatzivasiloglou, E., Kontos, A., Belessi, V., Bernard, M., and Falaras, P., 2005, “2-Ethyl-1-Hexanol Based Screen-Printed Titania Thin Films for Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells,” Solar Energy, 79, pp. 422–430. [CrossRef]

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Change of viscosity of catalyst inks based on different solvents. Solid fraction (0 s): βIso-/Propylalcohol = 0.169 g/ml; β1-hexanol = 0.130 g/ml.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

MS: Amount of solvents in catalyst layer based on 1-hexanol after 3 h of drying at 60 °C

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

MS: Amount of solvents in catalyst layer based on 1-hexanol after being washed with H2O for 3 h

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Comparison of layer thickness and catalyst loading of catalyst layers based on different solvents

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Comparison of layer thickness and catalyst loading of catalyst layers based on different solvents (SEM picture)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

High definition SEM picture of catalyst layers based on different solvents

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Electrochemical characterization of MEAs based on different solvents. Operating parameters: 1 M aq. MeOH/ air, cathodic flow rate: 36.9 ml/(min cm2), anodic flow rate: 0.22 ml/(min cm2), T = 70 °C, ambient pressure.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Influence of power output and dispersion time on particle size and viscosity on 1-hexanol based catalyst inks

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Influence of power output and dispersion time on surface structure of 1-hexanol based catalyst layer

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Electrochemical behavior of MEAs depending on power ouput of ultrasonication. MEA characteristics: anode catalyst loading: 1.6–2.1 mg/cm2, cathode catalyst loading: 2.5 mg/cm2. Operating parameters: 1 M aq. MeOH/air, cathodic flow rate: 36.9 ml/(min cm2), anodic flow rate: 0.22 ml/(min cm2), T = 70 °C, ambient pressure.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Electrochemical behavior of MEAs depending on duration of ultrasonication. MEA characteristics: anode catalyst loading: 1.6–2.1 mg/cm2, cathode catalyst loading: 2.5 mg/cm2. Operating parameters: 1 M aq. MeOH/air, cathodic flow rate: 36.9 ml/(min cm2), anodic flow rate: 0.22 ml/(min cm2), T = 70 °C, ambient pressure.

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In