Research Papers

Fuel Composition Transients in Fuel Cell Turbine Hybrid for Polygeneration Applications

[+] Author and Article Information
Nor Farida Harun

Department of Chemical Engineering,
McMaster University,
1280 Main Street West,
Hamilton, ON L8S 4L7, Canada
e-mail: adfarimie@yahoo.com

David Tucker

U.S. Department of Energy,
National Energy Technology Laboratory,
3610 Collins Ferry Road,
Morgantown, WV 26507-0880,
e-mail: David.Tucker@NETL.DOE.GOV

Thomas A. Adams, II

Department of Chemical Engineering,
McMaster University,
1280 Main Street West,
Hamilton, ON L8S 4L7, Canada
e-mail: tadams@mcmaster.ca

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Advanced Energy Systems Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF FUEL CELL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY. Manuscript received April 29, 2014; final manuscript received May 29, 2014; published online September 3, 2014. Editor: Nigel M. Sammes.

J. Fuel Cell Sci. Technol 11(6), 061001 (Sep 03, 2014) (8 pages) Paper No: FC-14-1057; doi: 10.1115/1.4028159 History: Received April 29, 2014; Revised May 29, 2014

Transient impacts on the performance of solid oxide fuel cell/gas turbine (SOFC/GT) hybrid systems were investigated using hardware-in-the-loop simulations (HiLSs) at a test facility located at the U.S. Department of Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory. The work focused on applications relevant to polygeneration systems, which require significant fuel flexibility. Specifically, the dynamic response of implementing a sudden change in fuel composition from syngas to methane was examined. The maximum range of possible fuel composition allowable within the constraints of carbon deposition in the SOFC and stalling/surging of the turbine compressor system was determined. It was demonstrated that the transient response was significantly impact the fuel cell dynamic performance, which mainly drives the entire transient in SOFC/GT hybrid systems. This resulted in severe limitations on the allowable methane concentrations that could be used in the final fuel composition when switching from syngas to methane. Several system performance parameters were analyzed to characterize the transient impact over the course of 2 h from the composition change.

Copyright © 2014 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Serra, L. M., Lozano, M.-A., Ramos, J., Ensinas, A. V., and Nebra, S. A., 2009, “Polygeneration and Efficient Use of Natural Resources,” Energy, 34(5), pp. 575–586. [CrossRef]
Li, S., Gao, L., Zhang, X., Lin, H., and Jin, H., 2012, “Evaluation of Cost Reduction Potential for a Coal Based Polygeneration System With CO2 Capture,” Energy, 45(1), pp. 101–106. [CrossRef]
Becker, W. L., Braun, R. J., Penev, M., and Melaina, M., 2012, “Design and Technoeconomic Performance Analysis of a 1 MW Solid Oxide Fuel Cell Polygeneration System for Combined Production of Heat, Hydrogen, and Power,” J. Power Sources, 200, pp. 34–44. [CrossRef]
Qian, Y., Liu, J., Huang, Z., Kraslawski, A., Cui, J., and Huang, Y., 2009, “Conceptual Design and System Analysis of a Poly-Generation System for Power and Olefin Production From Natural Gas,” Appl. Energy, 86(10), pp. 2088–2095. [CrossRef]
Chen, Y.-H., Chen, C.-Y., and Lee, S.-C., 2011, “Technology Forecasting and Patent Strategy of Hydrogen Energy and Fuel Cell Technologies,” Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 36(12), pp. 6957–6969. [CrossRef]
McLarty, D., Brouwer, J., and Samuelsen, S., 2013, “Hybrid Fuel Cell Gas Turbine System Design and Optimization,” ASME J. Fuel Cell Sci. Technol., 10(4), p. 041005. [CrossRef]
Traverso, A., Magistri, L., and Massardo, A. F., 2010, “Turbomachinery for the Air Management and Energy Recovery in Fuel Cell Gas Turbine Hybrid Systems,” Energy, 35(2), pp. 764–777. [CrossRef]
Haynes, C., and Wepfer, W. J., 2000, “Design for Power of a Commercial Grade Tubular Solid Oxide Fuel Cell,” Energy Convers. Manage., 41(11), pp. 1123–1139. [CrossRef]
Adams, T. A., Nease, J., Tucker, D., and Barton, P. I., 2012, “Energy Conversion With Solid Oxide Fuel Cell Systems: A Review of Concepts and Outlooks for the Short- and Long-Term,” Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 52(9), pp. 3089–3111. [CrossRef]
Tucker, D., Lawson, L., and Gemmen, R., 2005, “Characterization of Air Flow Management and Control in a Fuel Cell Turbine Hybrid Power System Using Hardware Simulation,” ASME Paper No. PWR2005-50127. [CrossRef]
Tucker, D., Lawson, L., Gemmen, R., and Dennis, R., 2005, “Evaluation of Hybrid Fuel Cell Turbine System Startup With Compressor Bleed,” ASME Paper No. GT2005-68784. [CrossRef]
Tucker, D., Liese, E., and Gamman, R., 2009, “Determination of the Operating Envelope for a Direct Fired Fuel Cell Turbine Hybrid Using Hardware Based Simulation,” Proceedings of the International Colloquium on Environmentally Preferred Advanced Power Generation (ICEPAG 2009), Newport Beach, CA, Feb. 10–12, Paper No. ICEPAG2009-1021.
Hughes, D., Wepfer, W. J., Davies, K., Ford, J. C., Haynes, C., and Tucker, D., 2011, “A Real-Time Spatial SOFC Model for Hardware-Based Simulation of Hybrid Systems,” ASME Paper No. FUELCELL2011-54591. [CrossRef]
Eguchi, K., Kojo, H., Takeguchi, T., Kikuchi, R., and Sasaki, K., 2002, “Fuel Flexibility in Power Generation by Solid Oxide Fuel Cells,” J. Solid State Ionics, 152–153, pp. 411–416. [CrossRef]
Yi, Y., Rao, A. D., Brouwer, J., and Samuelsen, G. S., 2005, “Fuel Flexibility Study of an Integrated 250kW SOFC Reformer System,” J. Power Sources, 144(1), pp. 67–76. [CrossRef]
Tucker, D., Smith, T. P., and Haynes, C., 2006, “Evaluation of Cathodic Air Flow Transients in a Hybrid System Using Hardware Simulation,” ASME Paper No. FUELCELL2006-97107. [CrossRef]
Pezzini, P., Tucker, D., and Traverso, A., 2013, “Avoiding Compressor Surge During Emergency Shut-Down Hybrid Turbine Systems,” ASME J. Gas Turbines Power, 135(10), p. 102602. [CrossRef]
Saravanamuttoo, H., Rogers, G., Cohen, H., and Straznicky, P., 2009, Gas Turbine Theory, Pearson Education Ltd., Upper Saddle River, NJ, pp. 47–69.


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Flow diagram of the hardware-based hybrid test facility at NETL

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Results of scoping studies: (a) real response during the entire course of offline simulation and (b) normalized plot for the first 10 s transient period

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Transition in fuel heating values (LHV) between syngas to humidified methane of three different compositions

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Block diagram of the load-based speed controller

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Real-time dynamic response and estimated steady state profile

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Dynamic profiles of thermal effluent, turbine speed, and turbine load: (a) the real response over 7000 s, (b) normalized plot of (a), and (c) the real response over 1050 s

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Normalized profiles of thermal effluent, turbine speed, and turbine load over 10 s after the step time

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

The effect of thermal effluent on turbine temperatures and SOFC cathode inlet temperature: (a) the real response over 7000 s, (b) the normalized plot of (a), and (c) normalized plot for the response over 1050 s

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Normalized plots of thermal effluent, turbine temperatures, and SOFC cathode inlet temperature over the first 50 s

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Turbine cycle efficiency

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

The SOFC cathode inlet flow and the compressor intake air flow transients: (a) the real response over 7000 s and (b) normalized plot of (a)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

SOFC performance during fuel composition dynamics: (a) the real response over 7000 s and (b) normalized plot of (a)




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In