0
Research Papers

Conceptual Design and Performance Analysis of SOFC/Micro Gas Turbine Hybrid Distributed Energy System

[+] Author and Article Information
Zheng Dang

Mem. ASME
Department of Building Environment
and Energy Engineering,
Xi'an Jiaotong University,
Xi'an, Shaanxi 710049, China
e-mail: zdang@mail.xjtu.edu.cn

Hua Zhao

Hong Kong Huayi Design Consultants (S.Z) LTD,
Shenzhen, Guangdong 518031, China

Guang Xi

Mem. ASME
National Engineering Research Center
of Fluid Machinery and Compressors,
Xi'an Jiaotong University,
Xi'an, Shaanxi 710049, China

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Advanced Energy Systems Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF FUEL CELL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY. Manuscript received October 30, 2014; final manuscript received November 15, 2014; published online January 28, 2015. Editor: Nigel M. Sammes.

J. Fuel Cell Sci. Technol 12(3), 031003 (Jun 01, 2015) (5 pages) Paper No: FC-14-1132; doi: 10.1115/1.4029395 History: Received October 30, 2014; Revised November 15, 2014; Online January 28, 2015

A numerical model has been developed for the performance analysis of solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC)/micro gas turbine (MGT) hybrid systems with prereforming of natural gas, in which a quasi two-dimensional model has been built up to simulate the cell electrochemical reaction, heat and mass transfer within tubular SOFC. The developed model can be used not only to predict the overall performance of the SOFC/MGT hybrid system but also to reveal the nonuniform temperature distribution within SOFC unit. The effects of turbine inlet temperature (TIT) and pressure ratio (PR) on the performance of the hybrid system have been investigated. The results show that selecting smaller TIT or PR value will lead to relative higher system efficiency and lower CO2 emission ratio; however, this will raise the risk to destroy SOFC beyond the limitation temperature of electrolyte.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2015 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Control volume for energy conservation

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Schematic layout for tubular SOFC

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Schematic layout for SOFC/MGT hybrid system

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Output power and cell voltage of SOFC/MGT hybrid system

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Efficiency and emission ratio of CO2 of SOFC/MGT hybrid system

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

RR and the utilization ratio between CO and H2 (zCO/zH2)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Electrolyte axial temperature distribution of tubular SOFC unit

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Output power and cell voltage of SOFC/MGT hybrid system

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Efficiency and emission ratio of CO2 of SOFC/MGT hybrid system

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Electrolyte axial temperature distribution of tubular SOFC unit

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In