0
Research Papers

The Impregnating Reduction Method for Synthesis of Pt–Ru Nanoparticles and Its Catalytic Performance for Methanol Electro-oxidation

[+] Author and Article Information
Long-long Wang

College of Environmental and
Chemical Engineering,
Shanghai University of Electric Power,
Shanghai 200090, China
e-mail: jiangnankobe@126.com

Hong-min Mao

Wuhan Product Quality Supervision and
Inspection Institute,
Wuhan 430043, Hubei, China
e-mail: hongminmao@163.com

Xiao-jin Zhou

College of Environmental and
Chemical Engineering,
Shanghai University of Electric Power,
Shanghai 200090, China
e-mail: zhouxiaojin2004@163.com

Qun-jie Xu

Professor
College of Environmental and
Chemical Engineering,
Shanghai University of Electric Power,
Shanghai 200090, China
e-mail: xuqunjie@shiep.edu.cn

Qiao-xia Li

Associate Professor
College of Environmental and
Chemical Engineering,
Shanghai University of Electric Power,
Shanghai 200090, China
e-mail: liqiaoxia@shiep.edu.cn

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Advanced Energy Systems Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF FUEL CELL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY. Manuscript received May 15, 2013; final manuscript received December 21, 2014; published online March 31, 2015. Editor: Nigel M. Sammes.

J. Fuel Cell Sci. Technol 12(4), 041001 (Aug 01, 2015) (4 pages) Paper No: FC-13-1051; doi: 10.1115/1.4029874 History: Received May 15, 2013; Revised December 21, 2014; Online March 31, 2015

Well-dispersed and low Pt content Pt–Ru/C nanoparticles were prepared by a developed impregnating reduction method with sodium citrate as stabilizer. The as-prepared Pt–Ru/C catalysts were characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), and energy dispersive X-ray (EDX) analysis. TEM showed that the Pt–Ru particles were quite uniformly distributed on the surface of the carbon with an average particle size of 3.5–4.5 nm. The effect of pH values on methanol electro-oxidation reaction was examined by cyclic voltammetry (CV) and chronoamperometry (CA). Pre-adsorbed CO monolayer stripping was used to evaluate the antipoisoning ability. The results showed that Pt–Ru/C (pH = 8) catalyst had the highest catalytic activity and stability toward the oxidation of methanol. Finally, comparing Pt–Ru/C (Pt–Ru 20 wt.%, Pt/Ru = 1:1) catalysts with Pt/C (Pt 20 wt.%), the onset potential was 200 mV lower and electrochemical active area was much bigger.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2015 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Liu, H., Song, C., Zhang, L., Zhang, J., Wang, H., and Wilkinson, D. P., 2006, “A Review of Anode Catalysis in the Direct Methanol Fuel Cell,” J. Power Sources, 155(2), pp. 95–110. [CrossRef]
Wasmus, S., and Küver, A., 1999, “Methanol Oxidation and Direct Methanol Fuel Cells: A Selective Review,” J. Electroanal. Chem., 461(1), pp. 14–31. [CrossRef]
Thomas, S. C., Ren, X., Gottesfeld, S., and Zelenay, P., 2002, “Direct Methanol Fuel Cells: Progress in Cell Performance and Cathode Research,” Electrochim. Acta, 47(22), pp. 3741–3748. [CrossRef]
Sahin, O., and Kivrak, H., 2013, “A Comparative Study of Electrochemical Methods on Pt–Ru DMFC Anode Catalysts: The Effect of Ru Addition,” Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 38(2), pp. 901–909. [CrossRef]
Sirk, A. H., Hill, J. M., Kung, S. K., and Birss, V. I., 2004, “Effect of Redox State of PtRu Electrocatalysts on Methanol Oxidation Activity,” J. Phys. Chem. B, 108(2), pp. 689–695. [CrossRef]
Shimazaki, Y., Kobayashi, Y., Yamada, S., Miwa, T., and Konno, M., 2005, “Preparation and Characterization of Aqueous Colloids of Pt–Ru Nanoparticles,” J. Colloid Interface Sci., 292(1), pp. 122–126. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Bernechea, M., García-Rodríguez, S., Terreros, P., de Jesúes, E., Fierro, J. L., and Rojas, S., 2011, “Synthesis of Core-Shell PtRu Dendrimer-Encapsulated Nanoparticles. Relevance as Electrocatalysts for CO Oxidation,” J. Phys. Chem. C, 115(4), pp. 1287–1294. [CrossRef]
Salgado, J., Paganin, V., Gonzalez, E., Montemor, M., Tacchini, I., Ansón, A., Salvador, M., Ferreira, P., Figueiredo, F., and Ferreira, M., 2013, “Characterization and Performance Evaluation of Pt–Ru Electrocatalysts Supported on Different Carbon Materials for Direct Methanol Fuel Cells,” Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 38(2), pp. 910–920. [CrossRef]
Frelink, T., Visscher, W., and Van Veen, J., 1995, “On the Role of Ru and Sn as Promotors of Methanol Electro-oxidation Over Pt,” Surf. Sci., 335(14), pp. 353–360. [CrossRef]
Chu, D., and Jiang, R., 2002, “Novel Electrocatalysts for Direct Methanol Fuel Cells,” Solid State Ionics, 148(3), pp. 591–599. [CrossRef]
Dubau, L., Hahn, F., Coutanceau, C., Léger, J.-M., and Lamy, C., 2003, “On the Structure Effects of Bimetallic PtRu Electrocatalysts Towards Methanol Oxidation,” J. Electroanal. Chem., 554–555(18), pp. 407–415. [CrossRef]
Guo, J., Zhao, T., Prabhuram, J., Chen, R., and Wong, C., 2005, “Preparation and Characterization of a PtRu/C Nanocatalyst for Direct Methanol Fuel Cells,” Electrochim. Acta, 51(4), pp. 754–763. [CrossRef]
Cheng, Y., and Jiang, S. P., 2013, “Highly Effective and CO-Tolerant PtRu Electrocatalysts Supported on Poly (Ethyleneimine) Functionalized Carbon Nanotubes for Direct Methanol Fuel Cells,” Electrochim. Acta, 99(11), pp. 124–132. [CrossRef]
Yang, C., Wang, D., Hu, X., Dai, C., and Zhang, L., 2008, “Preparation and Characterization of Multiwalled Carbon Nanotube (MWCNTs)-Supported Pt–Ru Catalyst for Methanol Electrooxidation,” J. Alloys Compd., 448(1), pp. 109–115. [CrossRef]
Li, Q., Mao, H., Li, J., and Xu, Q., 2013, “Effect of Nitric Acid on Modified Mesoporous Carbon as Catalyst Support of Direct Methanol Fuel Cell,” ASME J. Fuel Cell Sci. Technol., 10(5), p. 051006. [CrossRef]
Wang, S., Kuai, L., and Huang, Y., 2013, “A Highly Efficient, Clean-Surface, Porous Platinum Electrocatalyst and the Inhibition Effect of Surfactants on Catalytic Activity,” Chem.-A Eur. J., 19(1), pp. 240–248. [CrossRef]
Liu, Z., Ling, X., and Su, X., 2004, “Carbon-Support Pt and PtRu Nanoparticles as Catalysts for a Direct Methanol Fuel Cell,” J. Phys. Chem. B, 108(22), pp. 8234–8240. [CrossRef]

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

TEM images of Pt–Ru/C catalyst

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

EDX spectra of Pt–Ru/C catalyst

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

XRD patterns of (a) Pt/C and (b) Pt–Ru/C catalysts

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Cyclic voltammograms of methanol electro-oxidation on Pt–Ru/C electrode in 0.1 mol/L HClO4 + 0.5 mol/L CH3OH solution

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

CA curves of Pt–Ru/C in 0.1 mol/L HClO4 + 0.5 mol/L CH3OH solution

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

CO striping voltammetric curves of Pt/C and Pt–Ru/C in 0.1 mol/L HClO4

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In