0
Research Papers

Interface Reactions Between Sealing Glass and Metal Interconnect Under Static and Dynamic Heat Treatment Conditions

[+] Author and Article Information
Lian Peng, Zhaohui Xie

State Key Laboratory of Multiphase
Complex Systems,
Institute of Process Engineering,
Chinese Academy of Sciences,
Beijing 100190, China

Qingshan Zhu

State Key Laboratory of Multiphase
Complex Systems,
Institute of Process Engineering,
Chinese Academy of Sciences,
Zhong Guan Cun, P.O. Box 353,
Haidian District,
Beijing 100190, China
e-mail: qszhu@ipe.ac.cn

Ping Wang

Nuclear and Radiation Safety Center,
MEP (Ministry of Environmental Protection),
Beijing 100082, China

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Advanced Energy Systems Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF FUEL CELL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY. Manuscript received September 4, 2015; final manuscript received December 13, 2015; published online January 20, 2016. Editor: Wilson K. S. Chiu.

J. Fuel Cell Sci. Technol 12(6), 061009 (Jan 20, 2016) (7 pages) Paper No: FC-15-1069; doi: 10.1115/1.4032337 History: Received September 04, 2015; Revised December 13, 2015

Chemical compatibility of sealing glass with metal interconnects is a critical issue for planar solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC). In this paper, interface reactions between a sealing glass and a ferritic metal interconnect (SS410) are tested under three different heat treatment conditions: sealing (static), aging (static), and thermal cycling (dynamic). The results show that the BaCrO4 crystals with two different morphology (round-shaped and needle-shaped) form both at the three-phase boundary (where air, glass, and SS410 meet) and on the surface of the sealing glass under the three conditions. Round-shaped BaCrO4 crystals form with low O2 concentration and short reaction time. Needle-shaped BaCrO4 crystals form with high O2 concentration and long reaction time. For the thermal cycling condition, the BaCrO4 formed at early stages causes the delamination of the sealing interface. Then, O2 diffuses into the interior interface along the delamination path, which results in the formation of BaCrO4 at the interior interface. The delamination-enhanced BaCrO4 formation during thermal cycling will lead to crack along the sealing interface, causing the striking increase of leak rates.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2015 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Weil, K. S. , 2006, “ The State-of-the-Art in Sealing Technology for Solid Oxide Fuel Cells,” JOM, 58(8), pp. 37–44. [CrossRef]
Fergus, J. W. , 2005, “ Sealants for Solid Oxide Fuel Cells,” J. Power Sources, 147(1–2), pp. 46–57. [CrossRef]
Zhu, Q. S. , Peng, L. , and Zhang, T. , 2007, “Stable Glass Seals for Intermediate Temperature (IT) SOFC Applications,” Fuel Cell Electronics Packaging, Springer, New York, pp. 33–60.
Zhu, Q. S. , Peng, L. , and Zhang, T. , 2013, “Sealants for Planar Solid Oxide Fuel Cells,” Materials for High-Temperature Fuel Cells, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, Germany, pp. 215–244.
Hao, J. , Zan, Q. F. , Ai, D. Sh. , Ma, J. T. , Deng, C. , Sh. , and Xu, J. M. , 2012, “ Structure and High Temperature Physical Properties of Glass Seal Materials in Solid Oxide Electrolysis Cell,” J. Power Sources, 214, pp. 75–83. [CrossRef]
Sun, T. , Xiao, H. N. , Guo, W. M. , and Hong, X. C. , 2010, “ Effect of Al2O3 Content on BaO-Al2O3-B2O3-SiO2 Glass Sealant for Solid Oxide Fuel Cell,” Ceram. Int., 36(2), pp. 821–826. [CrossRef]
Ananthanarayanan, A. , Kothiyal, G. P. , Montagne, L. , Tricot, G. , and Revel, B. , 2011, “ The Effect of P2O5 on the Structure, Sintering and Sealing Properties of Barium Calcium Aluminum Boro-Silicate (BCABS) Glasses,” Mater. Chem. Phys., 130(3), pp. 880–889. [CrossRef]
Weil, K. S. , Deibler, J. E. , Hardy, J. S. , Kim, D. S. , Xia, G. G. , Chick, L. A. , and Coyle, C. A. , 2004, “ Rupture Testing as a Tool for Developing Planar Solid Oxide Fuel Cell Seals,” J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 13(3), pp. 316–326. [CrossRef]
Meinhardt, K. D. , Kim, D. S. , Chou, Y. S. , and Weil, K. S. , 2008, “ Synthesis and Properties of a Barium Aluminosilicate Solid Oxide Fuel Cell Glass-Ceramic Sealant,” J. Power Sources, 182(1), pp. 188–196. [CrossRef]
Gödeke, D. , and Dahlmann, U. , 2011, “ Study on the Crystallization Behaviour and Thermal Stability of Glass-Ceramics Used as Solid Oxide Fuel Cell-Sealing Materials,” J. Power Sources, 196(21), pp. 9046–9050. [CrossRef]
Yang, Z. G. , Xia, G. G. , Meinhardt, K. D. , Weil, K. S. , and Stevenson, J. W. , 2004, “ Chemical Stability of Glass Seal Interfaces in Intermediate Temperature Solid Oxide Fuel Cells,” J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 13(3), pp. 327–334. [CrossRef]
Yang, Z. G. , Stevenson, J. W. , and Meinhardt, K. D. , 2003, “ Chemical Interactions of Barium-Calcium-Aluminosilicate-Based Sealing Glasses With Oxidation Resistant Alloys,” Solid State Ionics, 160(3–4), pp. 213–225. [CrossRef]
Yang, Z. G. , Meinhardt, K. D. , and Stevenson, J. W. , 2003, “ Chemical Compatibility of Barium-Calcium-Aluminosilicate-Based Sealing Glassed With the Ferritic Stainless Steel Interconnect in SOFCs,” J. Electrochem. Soc., 150(8), pp. A1095–A1101. [CrossRef]
Chou, Y. S. , Stevenson, J. W. , and Singh, P. , 2007, “ Novel Refractory Alkaline Earth Silicate Sealing Glasses for Planar Solid Oxide Fuel Cells,” J. Electrochem. Soc., 154(7), pp. B644–B651. [CrossRef]
Peng, L. , and Zhu, Q. S. , 2009, “ Thermal Cycle Stability of BaO-B2O3-SiO2 Sealing Glass,” J. Power Sources, 194(2), pp. 880–885. [CrossRef]
Mahapatra, M. K. , and Lu, K. , 2010, “ Thermochemical Compatibility of a Seal Glass With Different Solid Oxide Cell Components,” Int. J. Appl. Ceram. Technol., 7(1), pp. 10–21. [CrossRef]
Chou, Y. S. , Thomsen, E. C. , Choi, J. P. , and Stevenson, J. W. , 2012, “ Compliant Alkali Silicate Sealing Glass for Solid Oxide Fuel Cell Applications: The Effect of Protective YSZ Coating on Electrical Stability in Dual Environment,” J. Power Sources, 202, pp. 149–156. [CrossRef]
Jin, T. , and Lu, K. , 2010, “ Compatibility Between AISI441 Alloy Interconnect and Representative Seal Glasses in Solid Oxide Fuel/Electrolyzer Cells,” J. Power Sources, 195(15), pp. 4853–4864. [CrossRef]
Peng, L. , and Zhu, Q. S. , 2008, “ The Development of Thermally Stable Sealing Glass in the BaO-B2O3-SiO2 System for Planar SOFC Applications,” ASME J. Fuel Cell Sci. Technol., 5(3), p. 031210. [CrossRef]
Hilpert, K. , Das, D. , Miller, M. , Peck, D. H. , and Weiβ, R. , 1996, “ Chromium Vapor Species Over Solid Oxide Fuel Cell Interconnect Materials and Their Potential for Degradation Processes,” J. Electrochem. Soc., 143(11), pp. 3642–3647. [CrossRef]
Takeda, S. , 2006, “ Oxygen and Silver Diffusion Into Float Glass,” J. Non-Cryst. Solids, 352(36–37), pp. 3910–3913. [CrossRef]
Takeda, S. , 2004, “ Evaluation of Oxygen in Oxide Materials by SIMS Using 18O2 Gas,” Appl. Surf. Sci., 231–232, pp. 864–867. [CrossRef]
Doremus, R. H. , 2004, “ Transport of Oxygen in Silicate Glasses,” J. Non-Cryst. Solids, 349, pp. 242–247. [CrossRef]
Ison, S. J. , Holland, D. , and Bushby, R. , 2000, “ Interfacial Reactions Between a Lead Borosilicate Glass Dielectric Coating and an Al/SiC Metal Matrix Composite,” Phys. Chem. Glasses, 41(5), pp. 267–271.
Tournour, C. C. , and Shelby, J. E. , 2005, “ Molecular Oxygen Diffusion in Vitreous Silica,” Phys. Chem. Glasses, 46(6), pp. 559–563.

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

(a) The SEM image of the investigated areas of the first couple. (b) The low-magnification SEM image of area 1. (c) The high-magnification SEM image of the marked area in (b). (d) The high-magnification SEM image of area 2. (e) The EDX dot analysis for the round-shaped BaCrO4 crystals in (d).

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Scheme of the three heat treatments

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

(a) The low-magnification SEM image of the three-phase boundary of the second couple. (b) The high-magnification SEM image of the marked area in (a). (c) The SEM image of the interface near the three-phase boundary of the second couple. (d) The SEM image of the interface far away from the three-phase boundary of the second couple. (e) The SEM image of the surface of the second couple. (f) The EDX dot analysis for the needle-shaped BaCrO4 crystals in (e).

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

(a) The SEM image of the three-phase boundary of the third couple. (b) The high-magnification SEM image of the marked area in (a). (c) The low-magnification SEM image of the interior area near the three-phase boundary of the third couple. (d) The high-magnification SEM image of the marked area in (c).

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

The EDX line analysis of the marked area in Fig. 4(d)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

The schematic illustration of the interfacial degradation mechanism

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In