0
Research Papers

Experimental Testing of a Novel Kilowatt-Scale Multistack Solid-Oxide Fuel Cell Assembly for Combined Heat and Power

[+] Author and Article Information
Gladys Anyenya, Buddy Haun, Mark Daubenspeck, Robert Braun

Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Colorado Fuel Cell Center,
Colorado School of Mines,
Golden, CO 80401

Neal P. Sullivan

Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Colorado Fuel Cell Center,
Colorado School of Mines,
Golden, CO 80401
e-mail: nsulliva@mines.edu

1Corresponding author.

Manuscript received September 6, 2016; final manuscript received November 25, 2016; published online January 4, 2017. Assoc. Editor: Kevin Huang.

J. Electrochem. En. Conv. Stor. 13(4), 041001 (Jan 04, 2017) (8 pages) Paper No: JEECS-16-1119; doi: 10.1115/1.4035352 History: Received September 06, 2016; Revised November 25, 2016

This paper describes experimental testing of a “geothermic fuel cell (GFC),” a novel application of solid-oxide fuel cells for combined heat and power. The geothermic fuel cell (GFC) is designed for in situ oil-shale processing. When implemented, the GFC is placed underground within an oil-shale formation; the heat released by the fuel cells while generating electricity is transferred to the oil shale, converting it into high-quality crude oil and natural gas. The GFC module presented here is comprised of three 1.5-kWe solid-oxide fuel cell (SOFC) stack-and-combustor assemblies packaged within a stainless-steel housing for the ease of installation within a bore hole drilled within the earth. The results from above-ground, laboratory testing of the geothermic fuel cell module are presented, with a number of operating conditions explored. Operation is demonstrated under hydrogen and natural-gas reformate fuels. The combined heat-and-power efficiency ranges from 56.2% to 74.2% at operating conditions that generally favor heat generation over electricity production. Testing of the geothermic fuel cell module over a wide operating range in a controlled, laboratory setting provides a valuable data set for developing more-detailed electrochemical and heat transfer models of module operation.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2016 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Sullivan, N. , Anyenya, G. , Haun, B. , Daubenspeck, M. , Bonadies, J. , Kerr, R. , Fischer, B. , Wright, A. , Jones, G. , Li, R. , Wall, M. , Forbes, A. , and Savage, M. , 2016, “ In-Ground Operation of Geothermic Fuel Cells for Unconventional Oil and Gas Recovery,” J. Power Sources, 302(20), pp. 402–409. [CrossRef]
Birdwell, J. , Mercier, T. , Johnson, R. , and Brownfield, M. , 2015, “ In-Place Oil Shale Resources of the Mahogany Zone, Green River Formation, Sorted by Grade, Overburden Thickness, and Stripping Ratio, Piceance Basin, Colorado, and Uinta Basin, Utah,” U.S. Geological Survey Fact Sheet, FS 2015-3005, pp. 1–6.
Li, Q. , Xiangxin, Q. , and Jiang, X. , 2014, “ Thermal Decomposition of Huadian oil Shale. Part 1: Critical Organic Intermediates,” Fuel, 121(1), pp. 109–116. [CrossRef]
Brandt, A. , 2008, “ Converting Oil Shale to Liquid Fuels: Energy Inputs and Greenhouse Gas Emissions of the Shell in Situ Conversion Process,” Environ. Sci. Technol., 42(19), pp. 7489–7495. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Johnson, R. C. , Mercier, T. J. , Brownfield, M. E. , and Self, J. G. , 2010, “ Assessment of In-Place Oil Shale Resources in the Eocene Green River Formation, Uinta Basin, Utah and Colorado,” U.S. Geological Survey Digital Data Series DDS-69-BB, p. 153.
Birdwell, J. , Mercier, T. , Johnson, R. , and Brownfield, M. , 2013, “ In-Place Oil Shale Resources Examined by Grade in the Major Basins of the Green River Formation, Colorado, Utah, and Wyoming,” U.S. Geological Survey Fact Sheet, FS 2012-3145, pp. 1–3.
Dyni, J. R. , 2006, “ Geology and Resources of Some World Oil-Shale Deposits,” U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report, FS 2005-5294, pp. 1–42.
Savage, M. T. , 2007, “ Apparatus and Method for Heating Subterranean Formations Using Fuel Cells,” U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Patent No. U.S.6684948.
Fischer, B. , Haltiner, K. , and Badura, C. , 2015, “ Heater and Method of Operating,” U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Patent No. US20150064592A1.
Haltiner, K. , Fischer, B. , and Badura, C. , 2015, “ Heater,” U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Patent No. US20150064593A1.
Schneider, J. , Haltiner, K. , Fischer, B. , and Badura, C. , 2015, “ Heater and Supporting Structure Thereof,” U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Patent No. US20150064594A1.
Fischer, B. , and Richards, J. , 2015, “ Method of Operating a Heater,” U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Patent No. US20150140461A1.
Fischer, B. , and Richards, J. , 2015, “ Heater With a Fuel Cell Stack Assembly and a Combustor and Method of Operating,” U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Patent No. US20150140463A1.
Ricci-Ottati, G. , Fischer, B. , Silvis, T. , and Weess, K. , 2015, “ Heater and Method of Operating,” U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Patent No. US20150162637A1.
Fischer, B. , Richards, J. , and Venkiteswaran, A. , 2015, “ Heater and Method of Operating,” U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Patent No. US20150204172A1.
Fischer, B. , and Richards, J. , 2015, “ Heater With a Fuel Cell Stack Assembly and a Combustor and Method of Operating,” U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Patent No. US20150280257A1.
Fischer, B. , Badura, C. , Ricci-Ottati, G. , and Richards, J. , 2015, “ Geothermic Heater System,” U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Patent No. US20150292298A1.
Haltiner, K. , 2015, “ Heater and Method of Operating,” World Intellectual Property Organization, Patent No. WO2015030777A1.
Fischer, B. , and Haltiner, K. , 2015, “ Heater and Method of Operating,” U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Patent No. US20150060061A1.
Haltiner, K. , and Wirth, M. , 2015, “ Heater and Method of Operating,” U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Patent No. US20150064591A1.
Mukerjee, S. , Haltiner, K. , Kerr, R. , Kim, J. , and Sprenkle, V. , 2011, “ Latest Update on Delphi's Solid Oxide Fuel Cell Stack for Transportation and Stationary Applications,” Solid Oxide Fuel Cells XII: Electrochem. Soc. Trans., 35(1), pp. 139–146.
Mukerjee, S. , Haltiner, K. , Klotzbach, D. , Vordonis, J. , Iyer, A. , and Kerr, R. , 2009, “ Solid Oxide Fuel Cell Stack for Transportation and Stationary Applications,” Solid Oxide Fuel Cells XI: Electrochem. Soc. Trans., 25(2), pp. 59–63.
Junaedi, C. , Vilekar, S. A. , Walsh, D. , Mastanduno, R. , Morgan, C. , and Roychoudhury, S. , 2012, “ Development of Integrated Reformer Systems for Syngas Production,” Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 37(13), pp. 10435–10443. [CrossRef]
Lisbona, P. , Corradetti, A. , Bove, R. , and Lunghi, P. , 2007, “ Analysis of a Solid Oxide Fuel Cell System for Combined Heat and Power Applications Under Non-Nominal Conditions,” Electrochim. Acta, 53(4), pp. 1920–1930. [CrossRef]
Song, T. W. , Sohn, J. L. , Kim, J. H. , Kim, T. S. , Ro, S. T. , and Suzuki, K. , 2005, “ Performance Analysis of a Tubular Solid Oxide Fuel Cell/Micro Gas Turbine Hybrid Power System Based on a Quasi-Two Dimensional Model,” J. Power Sources, 142(1–2), pp. 30–42. [CrossRef]
Chan, S. , Ho, H. , and Tian, Y. , 2002, “ Modeling of Simple Hybrid Solid Oxide Fuel Cell and Gas Turbine Power Plant,” J. Power Sources, 109(1), pp. 111–120. [CrossRef]
Palsson, J. , Selimovic, A. , and Sjunnesson, L. , 2000, “ Combined Solid Oxide Fuel Cell and Gas Turbine Systems for Efficient Power and Heat Generation,” J. Power Sources, 86(1–2), pp. 442–448. [CrossRef]
Chan, S. , Ho, H. , and Tian, Y. , 2003, “ Multi-Level Modeling of SOFC-Gas Turbine Hybrid System,” Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 28(8), pp. 889–900. [CrossRef]
Omosun, A. , Bauen, A. , Brandon, N. , Adjiman, C. , and Hart, D. , 2004, “ Modeling System Efficiencies and Costs of Two Biomass-Fueled SOFC Systems,” J. Power Sources, 131(1–2), pp. 96–106. [CrossRef]

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Schematic of the geothermic fuel cell module

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Process flow diagram of geothermic fuel cell test bench (top) and test stand image (bottom)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Surface temperatures and energy flows into and out of the geothermic fuel cell module. Values are shown for the 35-A quasi-steady-state condition. Arrows are scaled to reflect the relative magnitude of energy flow entering and exiting the GFC module.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Distribution of energy outputs from the geothermic fuel cell module at state point 2 (35 A)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Distribution of energy outputs from the geothermic fuel cell module under H2–N2 fuel. The size of each pie is scaled to reflect the total energy output at each state point.

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In