Discussion and Analysis of Flue Gas Utilization in a Phosphoric Acid Fuel Cell Engine During Idle Operation

[+] Author and Article Information
Daniel A. Betts

 University of Florida, 7643 NW 70th Ave, Parkland, FL 33067

Vernon P. Roan

 University of Florida, Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Gainesville, FL 32611

James H. Fletcher

 University of North Florida, 4567 St. Johns Bluff Rd. S, Jacksonville, FL 32224

J. Fuel Cell Sci. Technol 3(1), 26-32 (May 25, 2005) (7 pages) doi:10.1115/1.2133803 History: Received March 01, 2005; Revised May 25, 2005

Fuel cell technology has in recent years won the favor of all major car manufacturers as a likely future replacement of the internal combustion engine. This has been driven by the potential for high efficiency and low emissions. Still, fuel cell engines must overcome major hurdles before being introduced into the market. One such hurdle is systems integration; in particular, with fuel cell engines that do not use hydrogen as their primary fuel. In these engines, fuels, such as methanol, are employed instead of hydrogen because of their high-energy density and ease of storage. However, these benefits are counterbalanced by the need to reform these fuels on-board the fuel cell vehicle, thus substantially increasing the complexity of the fuel cell engine. Through the course of operating a 30ft methanol-fueled phosphoric acid fuel cell bus, repeated overheating of the steam-reformer catalyst bed at low engine power outputs was noted. For the purpose of better understanding these overheating events, relevant data was obtained from the bus. Bus operation at low-power outputs was found to have low hydrogen consumption (40% to 60% of the stack’s incoming hydrogen) due to low electrical demands and reformate flow rate constraints. In the bus, the anode flue gas is burned in the reformer burner, which provides the heat required for the endothermic methanol steam reforming reaction (see Fig. 1 later). At low engine power, the flue gas is the reformer burner’s only fuel, but the energy carried by the flue gas is much greater than the energy required for the reforming reaction and consequently causes reformer overheating at low power. This case serves as an example of how appropriate fuel cell system integration is crucial in order to harness fuel cell benefits. To study such system integration problems, a steady-state model of the fuel cell bus engine was developed. Using this model the bus reformer overheating problem was understood and several possible improvements for utilization of the flue gas were conceited.

Copyright © 2006 by American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.



Grahic Jump Location
Figure 1

Fuel cell bus engine layout

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 2

Hydrogen flow and stack hydrogen consumption versus stack power

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 3

Stack efficiency and heat generation as a function of stack power

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 4

Reforming power requirements

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 5

Reformer catalyst temperature data from fuel cell bus operating at less than 10kW stack output

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 6

Stack heating and cooling data from the fuel cell bus during low power operation

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 7

Hydrogen flow versus fuel cell stack power

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 8

Flue gas energy rate and reforming power requirements for varying stack power outputs

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 9

Stack heat generation and vaporizer power requirements at varying stack power outputs

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 10

Pressurized PEMFC engine using partial oxidation reforming



Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In