Research Papers

Mechanical Characterization of Thin SOFC Electrolytes With Honeycomb Support

[+] Author and Article Information
Mark E. Walter

Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering,
The Ohio State University,
201 West 19th Avenue,
Columbus, OH 43210
e-mail: walter.80@osu.edu

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Advanced Energy Systems Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF FUEL CELL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY. Manuscript received August 23, 2012; final manuscript received November 9, 2012; published online January 10, 2013. Assoc. Editor: Masashi Mori.

J. Fuel Cell Sci. Technol 10(1), 011001 (Jan 10, 2013) (7 pages) Paper No: FC-12-1077; doi: 10.1115/1.4023257 History: Received August 23, 2012; Revised November 09, 2012

Planar solid oxide fuel cells are made up of repeating sequences of electrolytes, electrodes, seals, and current collectors. The electrolyte should be as thin as possible for optimal electrochemical efficiency; however, for electrolyte-supported cells, the thin electrolytes are susceptible to damage during production, assembly, and operation. To produce cells that are sufficiently mechanically robust, electrolytes can be made having a cosintered honeycomb structure that supports thin, electrochemically efficient electrolyte membranes. Use of finite element analysis is desirable to mechanically characterize such electrolytes. To maintain reasonable numbers of elements and element aspect ratios, it is not possible to simultaneously model the small-scale details together with the overall membrane response. A two-scale approach is devised: the smaller mesoscale analyzes a representative area of the electrolyte, while the larger macroscale examines the electrolyte as a whole. Elastic properties for the mesoscale model are measured over a range of temperatures using a sonic resonance technique. Effective properties for the macroscale are obtained over a range of mesoscale geometries and can be obtained without needing to rerun the mesoscale simulations. The effective properties are experimentally validated using four-point bend experiments on representative samples. The bulk properties and the effective properties can then be used as material inputs for the macroscale model in order to design cells that are more sufficiently mechanically robust without sacrificing electrochemical performance.

© 2013 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Haile, S. M., 2003, “Fuel Cell Materials and Components,” Acta Mater., 51(19), pp. 5981–6000. [CrossRef]
Ormerod, R. M., 2003, “Solid Oxide Fuel Cells,” Chem. Soc. Rev., 32(1), pp. 17–28. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Singh, P., and Minh, N. Q., 2005, “Solid Oxide Fuel Cells: Technology Status,” Int. J. Appl. Ceram. Technol., 1(1), pp. 5–15. [CrossRef]
Minh, N. Q., 2004, “Solid Oxide Fuel Cell Technology—Features and Applications,” Solid State Ionics, 174(1–4), pp. 271–277. [CrossRef]
Sammes, N., Smirnova, A., and Vasylyev, O., eds., 2005, Fuel Cell Technologies: State and Perspectives, Vol. 202, Springer, New York, pp. 19–34.
Xue, L. A., Barringer, E. A., Cable, T. L., Goettler, R. W., and Kneidel, K. E., 2004, “SOFCo Planar Solid Oxide Fuel Cell,” Int. J. Appl. Ceram. Technol., 1(1), pp. 16–22. [CrossRef]
Timurkutluk, B., Celik, S., Timurkutluk, C., Mat, M. D., and Kaplan, Y., 2012, “Novel Structured Electrolytes for Solid Oxide Fuel Cells,” J. Power Sources, 213, pp. 47–54. [CrossRef]
Cooley, N., 2009, “NexTech Materials Demonstrates World's Largest SOFC Platform,” Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 34(19), p. 8454. [CrossRef]
Chapelle, D., and Bathe, K. J., 1998, “Fundamental Considerations for the Finite Element Analysis of Shell Structures,” Comput. Struct., 66(1), pp. 19–36. [CrossRef]
Yamamoto, O., Arati, Y., Takeda, Y., Imanishi, N., Mizutani, Y., Kawai, M., and Nakamura, Y., 1995, “Electrical Conductivity of Stabilized Zirconia With Ytterbia and Scandia,” Solid State Ionics, 79, pp. 137–142. [CrossRef]
Selçuk, A., and Atkinson, A., 1997, “Elastic Properties of Ceramic Oxides Used in Solid Oxide Fuel Cells (SOFC),” J. Eur. Ceram. Soc., 17(12), pp. 1523–1532. [CrossRef]
Selçuk, A., and Atkinson, A., 2004, “Strength and Toughness of Tape-Cast Yttria-Stabilized Zirconia,” J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 83(8), pp. 2029–2035. [CrossRef]
ASTM International, 2009, “ASTM E1876-09 Standard Test Method for Dynamic Young's Modulus, Shear Modulus, and Poisson's Ratio by Impulse Excitation of Vibration,” retrieved September 29, 2012, http://www.astm.org/Standards/E1876.htm
Shimada, M., Matsushita, K., Kuratani, S., Okamoto, T., Koizumi, M., Tsukuma, K., and Tsukidate, T., 1984, “Temperature Dependence of Young's Modulus and Internal Friction in Alumina, Silicon Nitride, and Partially Stabilized Zirconia Ceramics,” J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 67(2), pp. C23–C24. [CrossRef]
Adams, J. W., Ruh, R., and Mazdiyasni, K. S., 2005, “Young's Modulus, Flexural Strength, and Fracture of Yttria-Stabilized Zirconia Versus Temperature,” J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 80(4), pp. 903–908. [CrossRef]
Giraud, S., and Canel, J., 2008, “Young's Modulus of Some SOFCs Materials as a Function of Temperature,” J. Eur. Ceram. Soc., 28(1), pp. 77–83. [CrossRef]
Xia, Z., Zhang, Y., and Ellyin, F., 2003, “A Unified Periodical Boundary Conditions for Representative Volume Elements of Composites and Applications,” Int. J. Solids Struct., 40(8), pp. 1907–1921. [CrossRef]
Gibson, L. J., 1989, “Modelling the Mechanical Behavior of Cellular Materials,” Mater. Sci. Eng., A, 110, pp. 1–36. [CrossRef]
Staab, G. H., 1999, Laminar Composites, Butterworth-Heinemann, Woburn, MA.
Suresh, A. D., 2010, “Modeling of Electrolytic Membranes for Large Area Planar Solid Oxide Fuel Cells,” M.S. thesis, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.
Ponraj, R., and Iyer, S. R., 1992, “A Simple Four-Point Bend Creep Testing Apparatus for Brittle Ceramic Materials,” J. Mater. Sci. Lett., 11(14), pp. 1000–1003. [CrossRef]


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Geometry of the proposed nonuniformly thick SOFC electrolyte with honeycomb support

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Two-scale modeling approach used to characterize the nonuniformly thick electrolyte membranes

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Sample data obtained from a resonance test

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

The first five resonance modes (top to bottom) obtained using ANSYS

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Temperature-dependent Young's modulus determined by a resonance technique

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

The repeating unit cell for various orientations

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Flexural stress-strain data calculated from four-point bend loads and displacements

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Theoretical stiffness of the support layer as calculated from simulation results, the curve fit in Eq. (9), and generic honeycombs in Ref. [18]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7 %AA

versus %Eeq for geometries having common thicknesses



Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In