Research Papers

Trivariant Lagrange Factor Polynomial for Discrete Rayleigh Distributed Reliability Analysis of Aeroengine Combustion Chamber Cylinder

[+] Author and Article Information
Chun Nam Wong

School of Mechanical and Electronic Engineering,
Lanzhou University of Technology,
No. 287, Langongping Road, Qilihe District,
Lanzhou, Gansu 730050, China
e-mail: simon_may2000@yahoo.cn

Yang Lu

Project Engineer
Research Center of Crafts and Mechanical Engineering Technology,
Space Star Technology Co. Ltd.,
Zhichun Road No. 82, Haidian District,
Beijing 10086, China
e-mail: ly199387@163.com

1Corresponding author.

Manuscript received October 10, 2012; final manuscript received November 13, 2012; published online January 10, 2013. Editor: Nigel M. Sammes.

J. Fuel Cell Sci. Technol 10(1), 011002 (Jan 10, 2013) (7 pages) Paper No: FC-12-1102; doi: 10.1115/1.4023258 History: Received October 10, 2012; Revised November 13, 2012

In most of the existing stress-strength interference (SSI) models, stress and strength are assumed to be independent structural variants. However, under severe thermal conditions, such as in aeroengine combustion chamber, this assumption may not hold. One structural variant, such as strength, may become unilateral dependent on another variant, such as stress or temperature. In addition, to evaluate the discrete reliability of structures using unilateral dependent structural variants, discrete SSI models were developed using not just linear polynomial or line segments, but higher order polynomials. These models are based on the trivariant Lagrange factor polynomial approach. Normal distributed temperature dependent stress and Rayleigh distributed thermal stress dependent strength are represented by discrete structural variants that possess unilateral dependent probability mean functions. Based on their dependence formulations, the trivariant Lagrange factor polynomial of the discrete SSI model was generated. Applicability of this method was validated by a specific aeroengine combustion chamber cylinder using different molding alloys. Meanwhile the application range of some existing SSI models is extended for interval shifted data. Comparing machinability, reliability, and economic factors, 1Cr11MoV was the most suitable alloy in the design.

© 2013 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


An, Z. W., Huang, H. Z., and Liu, Y., 2007, “A Discrete Stress-Strength Interference Model Based on Universal Generating Function,” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 93(10), pp. 1485–1490. [CrossRef]
Mevrel, R., 1989, “State of the Art on High-Temperature Corrosion-Resistant Coatings,” Mater. Sci. Eng., A120, pp. 13–24. [CrossRef]
Itoh, Y., Saitoh, M., and Tamura, M., 2000, “Characteristics of MCrAlY Coatings Sprayed by High Velocity Oxygen-Fuel Spraying System,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 122, pp. 43–49. [CrossRef]
Kimmel, J., Mutasim, Z., and Brentnall, W., 2000, “Effects of Alloy Composition on the Performance of Yttria Stabilized Zirconia—Thermal Barrier Coatings,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 122, pp. 393–400. [CrossRef]
Amano, R. S., Wang, K. D., and Pavelic, V., 1994, “A Study of Rotor Cavities and Heat Transfer in a Cooling Process in a Gas Turbine,” ASME J. Turbomach., 116, pp. 333–338. [CrossRef]
Ushakov, I., 1986, “A Universal Generating Function,” Sov. J. Comput. Syst. Sci., 24(5), pp. 118–129.
Levitin, G., 2004, “A Universal Generating Function Approach for the Analysis of Multi-State Systems With Dependent Elements,” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 84(3), pp. 285–292. [CrossRef]
Levitin, G., 2005, The Universal Generating Function in Reliability Analysis and Optimization, Springer, London.
Lisnianski, A., and Levitin, G., 2003, Multi-State System Reliability—Assessment, Optimization and Applications, World Scientific, Singapore.
Huang, H., and An, Z., 2009, “A Discrete Stress-Strength Interference Model With Stress Dependent Strength,” IEEE Trans. Reliab., 58(1), pp. 118–122. [CrossRef]
Wang, J. D., and Liu, T. S., 1994, “Discrete Stress-Strength Interference Model for Unreliability Bounds,” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 44(2), pp. 125–130. [CrossRef]
Wang, J. D., and Liu, T. S., 1996, “Fuzzy Reliability Using a Discrete Stress-Strength Interference Model,” IEEE Trans. Reliab., 45(1), pp. 145–149. [CrossRef]
Wong, C. N., Huang, H., Xiong, J., and Hu, T., 2010, “Part Reliability Design of Air-Cooled Turbine Blade Under Thermal Stress-Dependent Strength Using Polynomial Method,” Proceedings of ASME 2010 IDETC/CIE, DETC2010-28113, Montreal, Canada, August 15–18, ASME Paper No. DETC2010-28113, pp. 293–298. [CrossRef]
Wong, C. N., Huang, H., Lu, Y., and He, P., 2011, “Part Reliability Design of Centrifugal Nozzle Under Thermal Stress-Dependent Strength Using Polynomial Method,” Proceedings of the ICQR2MSE 2011, Xian, China, June 17–19, pp. 898–903.
Wong, C. N., Huang, H., Lu, Y., and He, P., 2012, “Weibull Distributed TSDS Analysis of Aeroengine Burner Inner-Liner Using Bi-Variant LFP Method,” Proceedings of the QR2MSE 2012, Chengdu, China, June 15–18, pp. 312–317.
Karadeniz, H., 2001, “Uncertainty Modeling in the Fatigue Reliability Calculation of Offshore Structures,” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 74(3), pp. 323–335. [CrossRef]
Sengupta, B., and Ahmad, S., 1996, “Reliability Assessment of Tension Leg Platform Tethers Under Nonlinearly Coupled Loading,” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 53(1), pp. 47–60. [CrossRef]
Nagode, M., and Fajdiga, M., 1999, “The Influence of Variable Operating Conditions Upon the General Multi-Modal Weibull Distribution,” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 64(3), pp. 383–389. [CrossRef]
He, P., 2009, “Technical Research on Aeroengine Main Combustion Chamber Cylinder Structural Design,” M.S. thesis, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
Kong, R. L., 1995, Aeroengine Reliability Engineering, Aeronautic Industry Publisher, Beijing, pp. 274–278.


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Temperature contours of designed combustion chamber cylinder at 520 °C operation temperature

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Stress contours of designed combustion chamber cylinder at 520 °C operation temperature

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Sectional view of aeroengine combustion chamber cylinder

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Finite element model of combustion chamber cylinder

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Comparison chart of one-third interval shifted Rayleigh distributed tsds (exact versus TLFP)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Aeroengine combustion chamber cylinder manufactured by China Gas Turbine Establishment



Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In