Research Papers

Multicriteria Assessment of the Performance of Solid Oxide Fuel Cells by Cell Design and Materials Development: Design and Modeling Approach

[+] Author and Article Information
Junichiro Otomo

Department of Environment Systems,
Graduate School of Frontier Sciences,
The University of Tokyo,
5-1-5 Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa,
Chiba 277-8563, Japan;
Center for Low Carbon Society Strategy,
Japan Science and Technology Agency,
7, Gobancho, Chiyoda-ku,
Tokyo, 102-0076, Japan
e-mail: otomo@k.u-tokyo.ac.jp

Keiko Waki

Department of Energy Sciences,
Interdisciplinary Graduate School of Science and Engineering,
Tokyo Institute of Technology,
4259 Nagatsuta-cho, Midori-ku,
Yokohama, Kanagawa, 226-8502, Japan;
Center for Low Carbon Society Strategy,
Japan Science and Technology Agency,
7, Gobancho, Chiyoda-ku,
Tokyo, 102-0076, Japan

Koichi Yamada

Office of the President,
The University of Tokyo,
Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8656, Japan;
Center for Low Carbon Society Strategy,
Japan Science and Technology Agency,
7, Gobancho, Chiyoda-ku
Tokyo, 102-0076, Japan

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Advanced Energy Systems Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF FUEL CELL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY. Manuscript received April 29, 2012; final manuscript received December 20, 2012; published online January 30, 2013. Assoc. Editor: Ken Reifsnider.

J. Fuel Cell Sci. Technol 10(1), 011007 (Jan 30, 2013) (11 pages) Paper No: FC-12-1033; doi: 10.1115/1.4023387 History: Received April 29, 2012; Revised December 20, 2012

The performance of current solid oxide fuel cells (SOFCs) was evaluated in terms of the cell designs and the physicochemical properties of the component materials such as the electrode and electrolyte in order to demonstrate the potentials of state-of-the-art SOFC technology for the widespread use of SOFCs. A flat tubular type SOFC stack for residential use was analyzed as a standard case of a production version in terms of stack volume, weight, and material cost. The power density and power generation efficiency were also evaluated by model estimation. A microtubular type SOFC was evaluated as an example of an advanced cell design. The assessment of the cell design can pinpoint performance advantages of the microtubular type in stack volume, weight, material cost, volumetric power density, and efficiency. In addition, we attempted to demonstrate an analysis for the concurrent comparison of the impact of cell designs and material properties on cell performance by using volumetric power density as a common assessment criterion. Through the assessment with the state-of-the-art SOFC technology, it is possible to make a quantitative comparison of the significances of cell design and material property. The present assessment suggests that the development of cell design is a consistent approach to improving cell and stack performance. In this way, the proposed assessment can provide hints to a reliable research strategy for improving cell performance and realizing the widespread use of SOFCs.

© 2013 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Singhal, S. C., and Kendall, K., 2003, High-Temperature Solid Oxide Fuel Cells: Fundamentals, Design, and Application, 1st ed., Elsevier Advanced Technology, New York.
Payne, R., Love, J., and Kah, M., 2009, “Generating Electricity at 60% Electrical Efficiency From l–2 kWe SOFC Products,” ECS Trans., 25(2), pp. 231–239. [CrossRef]
Shimano, J., Yamazaki, H., Mizutani, Y., Hisada, K., Ukai, K., Yokoyama, M., Nagai, K., Kashima, S., Orishima, H., Nakatuka, S., Uwani, H., and Hirakawa, M., 2007, “Development Status of a Planer Type of 1 kW Class SOFC System,” ECS Trans., 7(1), pp. 141–148. [CrossRef]
Leah, R., Bone, A., Selcuk, A., Corcoran, D., Lankin, M., Dehaney-Steven, Z., Selby, M., and Whalen, P., 2011, “Development of Highly Robust, Volume-Manufacturable Metal-Supported SOFCs for Operation Below 600 °C,” ECS Trans., 35(1), pp. 351–367. [CrossRef]
Suzuki, M., 2003, “MEA/Cell Preparation Methods: Japan/Asia,” Handbook of Fuel Cells—Fundamentals, Technology and Applications, W. Vielstich, H. A.Gasteiger, and A.Lamm, eds., John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK, pp. 1032–1036.
Singhal, S. C., 2002, “Solid Oxide Fuel Cells for Stationary, Mobile, and Military Applications,” Solid State Ionics, 152–153, pp. 405–410. [CrossRef]
Singhal, S. C., 2000, “Advances in Solid Oxide Fuel Cell Technology,” Solid State Ionics, 135, pp. 305–313. [CrossRef]
Orui, H., Watanabe, K., and Arakawa, M., 2002, “Electrochemical Characteristics of Tubular Flat-Plate-SOFCs Fabricated by Co-Firing Cathode Substrate and Electrolyte,” J. Power Sources, 112, pp. 90–97. [CrossRef]
Lu, Y., and Schaefer, L., 2006, “Numerical Study of a Flat-Tube High Power Density Solid Oxide Fuel Cell Part II: Cell Performance and Stack Optimization,” J. Power Sources, 153, pp. 68–75. [CrossRef]
Vora, S. D., 2007, “Development of High Power Density Seal-Less SOFCs,” ECS Trans., 7(1), pp. 149–154. [CrossRef]
Yamaguchi, T., Shimizu, S., Suzuki, T., Fujishiro, Y., and Awano, M., 2009, “Design and Fabrication of a Novel Electrode-Supported Honeycomb SOFC,” J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 92(S1), pp. S107–S111. [CrossRef]
Kendall, K., and Palin, M., 1998, “A Small Solid Oxide Fuel Cell Demonstrator for Microelectronic Applications,” J. Power Sources, 71, pp. 268–270. [CrossRef]
Sammes, N. M., Du, Y., and Bove, R., 2005, “Design and Fabrication of a 100 W Anode Supported Micro-Tubular SOFC Stack,” J. Power Sources, 145, pp. 428–434. [CrossRef]
Otake, T., Yokoyarna, M., Nagai, K., Ukai, K., and Mizutani, Y., 2007, “Effect of GDC Electrolyte Thickness on the Performance of Anode Supported Micro Tubular SOFC,” ECS Trans., 7(1), pp. 551–554. [CrossRef]
Yamada, K., Takahashi, N., and Wen, C. J., 2002, “Design and Evaluation of Electric Vehicle Using Solid Oxide Fuel Cells,” J. Chem. Eng. Jpn., 35(12), pp. 1290–1297. [CrossRef]
Suzuki, T., Yamaguchi, T., Fujishiro, Y., and Awano, M., 2006, “Fabrication and Characterization of Micro Tubular SOFCs for Operation in the Intermediate Temperature,” J. Power Sources, 160, pp. 73–77. [CrossRef]
Sin, Y. W., Galloway, K., Roy, B., Sammes, N. M., Song, J. H., Suzuki, T., and Awano, M., 2011, “The Properties and Performance of Micro-Tubular (Less Than 2.0 mm o.d.) Anode Supported Solid Oxide Fuel Cell (SOFC),” Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 36, pp. 1882–1889. [CrossRef]
Williams, M. C., Strakey, J. P., and Singhal, S.C., 2004, “U.S. Distributed Generation Fuel Cell Program,” J. Power Sources, 131, pp. 79–85. [CrossRef]
Boivin, J. C., and Mairesse, G., 1998, “Recent Material Developments in Fast Oxide Ion Conductors,” Chem. Mater., 10, pp. 2870–2888. [CrossRef]
Zhu, W. Z., and Deevi, S. C., 2003, “A Review on the Status of Anode Materials for Solid Oxide Fuel Cells,” Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 362, pp. 228–239. [CrossRef]
Sun, C., Hui, R., and Roller, J., 2010, “Cathode Materials for Solid Oxide Fuel Cells: A Review,” J. Solid State Electrochem., 14, pp. 1125–1144. [CrossRef]
Kendall, K., 2005, “Progress in Solid Oxide Fuel Cell Materials,” Inter. Mater. Rev., 50(5), pp. 257–264. [CrossRef]
Suzuki, M., Sogi, T., Higaki, K., Ono, T., Takahashi, N., Shimazu, K., and Shigehisa, T., 2007, “Development of SOFC Residential Cogeneration System At Osaka Gas and Kyocera,” ECS Trans., 7(1), pp. 27–30. [CrossRef]
Suzuki, M., Iwata, S., Higaki, K., Inoue, S., Shigehisa, T., Miyachi, I., Nakabayashi, H., and Shimazu, K., 2009, “Development and Field Test Results of Residential SOFC CHP System,” ECS Trans., 25(2), pp. 143–147. [CrossRef]
Koi, M., Yamashita, S., and Matsuzaki, Y., 2007, “Development of Segmented-in-Series Cell-Stacks With Flat-Tubular Substrates,” ECS Trans., 7(1), pp. 235–243. [CrossRef]
Matsuzaki, Y., Hatae, T., and Yamashita, S., 2009, “Long-Term Stability of Segmented Type Cell-Stacks Developed for Residential Use Less Than 1 kW,” ECS Trans., 25(2), pp. 159–166. [CrossRef]
Iwamoto, T., 2007, Japan patent, September 27:P2009-87539A.
Mai, A., Haanappel, V. A. C., Tietz, F., and Stöver, D., 2006, “Ferrite-Based Perovskites As Cathode Materials for Anode-Supported Solid Oxide Fuel Cells Part II. Influence of the CGO Interlayer,” Solid State Ionics, 177, pp. 2103–2107. [CrossRef]
Murray, E. P., Sever, M. J., and Barnett, S. A., 2002, “Electrochemical Performance of (La,Sr)(Co,Fe)O3 Composite Cathode,” Solid State Ionics, 148, pp. 27–34. [CrossRef]
Zhu, W. Z., and Deevi, S. C., 2003, “Development of Interconnect Materials for Solid Oxide Fuel Cells,” Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 348, pp. 227–243. [CrossRef]
Yasuda, N., Uehara, T., Okamoto, M., Aoki, C., Ohno, T., and Toji, A., 2009, “Improvement of Oxidation Resistance of Fe-Cr Ferritic Alloy Sheets for SOFC Interconnects,” ECS Trans., 25(2), pp. 1447–1453. [CrossRef]
Larring, Y., and Norby, T., 2000, “Spinel and Perovskite Functional Layers Between Plansee Metallic Interconnect (Cr-5 wt % Fe-1 wt % Y2O3) and Ceramic (La0.85Sr0.15)0.91MnO3 Cathode Materials for Solid Oxide Fuel Cells,” J. Electrochem. Soc., 147(9), pp. 3251–3256. [CrossRef]
Prette, A. L. G., Cologna, M., Sglavo, V., and Raj, R., 2011, “Flash-Sintering of Co2MnO4 Spinel for Solid Oxide Fuel Cell Applications,” J. Power Sources, 196, pp. 2061–2065. [CrossRef]
Lee, A. L., Zabransky, R. F., and Huber, W. J., 1990, “Internal Reforming Development for Solid Oxide Fuel Cells”, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 29, pp. 766–773. [CrossRef]
Mason, E. A., and Malinauskas, A. P., 1983, Gas Transport in Porous Media: The Dusty-Gas Model (Chemical Engineering Monographs), Elsevier, Amsterdam.
Kim, J. W., Virkar, A. V., Fung, K. Z., Mehta, K., and Singhal, S. C., 1999, “Polarization Effects in Intermediate Temperature, Anode-Supported Solid Oxide Fuel Cells,” J. Electrochem. Soc., 146(1), pp. 69–78. [CrossRef]
Chan, S. H., Khor, K. A., and Xia, Z. T., 2001, “A Complete Polarization Model of a Solid Oxide Fuel Cell and Its Sensitivity to the Change of Cell Component Thickness,” J. Power Sources, 93, pp. 130–140. [CrossRef]
Cussler, E. L., 1997, Diffusion: Mass Transfer in Fluid Systems (Cambridge Series in Chemical Engineering), 2nd ed., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
Kudo, T., and Obayashi, H., 1976, “Mixed Electrical Conduction in the Fluorite-Type Ce1xGdxO22/x,” J. Electrochem. Soc., 123, pp. 415–419. [CrossRef]
Handbook of 15710 Chemical Products, 2010, The Chemical Daily Co. Ltd, Tokyo.
Ippommatsu, M., Sasaki, H., and Otoshi, S., 1996, “Evaluation of the Cost Performance of the SOFC Cell in the Market,” Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 21, pp. 129–135. [CrossRef]
van Herle, J., McEvoy, A. J., and Thampi, K. R., 1994, “Conductivity Measurements of Various Yttria-Stabilized Zirconia Samples,” J. Mater. Sci., 29, pp. 3691–3701. [CrossRef]
Fu, C., Sun, K., Zhang, N., Chen, X., and Zhou, D., 2007, “Electrochemical Characteristics of LSCF-SDC Composite Cathode for Intermediate Temperature SOFC,” Electrochim. Acta, 52, pp. 4589–4594. [CrossRef]
Esquirol, A., Brandon, N. P., Kilner, J. A., and Mogensen, M., 2004, “Electrochemical Characterization of La0.6Sr0.4Co0.2Fe0.8O3 Cathodes for Intermediate-Temperature SOFCs,” J. Electrochem. Soc., 151, pp. A1847–A1855. [CrossRef]
Achenbach, E., 1994, “Three-Dimensional and Time-Dependent Simulation of a Planar Solid Oxide Fuel Cell Stack,” J. Power Sources, 49, pp. 333–348. [CrossRef]
Aguiar, P., Adjiman, C. S., and Brandon, N. P., 2004, “Anode-Supported Intermediate Temperature Direct Internal Reforming Solid Oxide Fuel Cell. I: Model-Based Steady-State Performance,” J. Power Sources, 138, pp. 120–136. [CrossRef]
Cui, D., Yang, C., Huang, K., and Chen, F., 2010, “Effect of Testing Configurations and Cell Geometries on the Performance of a SOFC: A Modeling Approach,” Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 35, pp. 10495–10504. [CrossRef]
Wang, L., Merkle, R., and Maier, J., 2010, “Surface Kinetics and Mechanism of Oxygen Incorporation Into Ba1xSrxCoyFe1yO3δ SOFC Microelectrodes,” J. Electrochem. Soc., 157, pp. B1802–B1808. [CrossRef]
Ishihara, T., Matsuda, H., and Takita, Y., 1995, “Effects of Rare Earth Cations Doped for La Site on the Oxide Ionic Conductivity of LaGaO3-Based Perovskite Type Oxide,” Solid State Ionics, 79, pp. 147–151. [CrossRef]
Ni, M., Leung, D. Y. C., and Leung, M. K. H., 2008, “Modeling Methane Fed Solid Oxide Fuel Cells: Comparison Between Proton Conducting Electrolyte and Oxygen Ion Conducting Electrolyte,” J. Power Sources, 183, pp. 133–142. [CrossRef]


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Schematic design of a flat tubular type of cell

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Schematic design of the microtubular type of cell: (a) dimension of a single cell; (b) stack configuration (type A); and (c) stack configuration (type B)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Cell voltage, polarization, and power density for a standard single cell performance as a function of current density under standard operation conditions (see Table 1). Polarization curves, (a) ohmic loss; (b) cathode activation; (c) anode activation; (d) anode concentration; and (e) cathode concentration. The filled circle indicates the standard dc output condition.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Cell efficiency (dc) as a function of stack dc output power, according to the cell performance plotted in Fig. 3 (fuel utilization = 0.7). The filled circle indicates the standard dc output condition.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Dependence of stack weight, stack volume, and volumetric power density (dc output power/stack volume) on areal power density for a flat tubular type of cell at a fixed dc output power of 800 W

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

The influence of cell design on (a) stack weight, (b) net cell-module volume with a reformer, and (c) net volumetric power density for flat tubular, and microtubular cells (types A and B) at a fixed dc output power of 800 W. (See main text for the definitions of (b) and (c).)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

The influence of cell design on cell efficiency for flat tubular and microtubular cells (types A and B) at a fixed net volumetric power density (0.21 kW/L: reference value of a flat tubular type of cell)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Sensitivity analysis for cell design and material properties of electrode and electrolyte. The broken line represents the base curve for a flat tubular type of cell, i.e., the relationship between net volumetric power density (y) and electrode area for the single cell (x) [y = −0.38 ln(x) + 1.5].



Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In