Technical Briefs

Fuel Cell Systems as Power Sources for Sensor Applications

[+] Author and Article Information
Tony M. Thampan

e-mail: tony.m.thampan.civ@mail.mil
5100 Magazine Road,
Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD 21005

Mark A. Govoni

5100 Magazine Road,
Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD 21005

John T. Clark

2800 Powder Mill Road,
Adelphi, MD 20783

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Advanced Energy Systems Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF FUEL CELL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY. Manuscript received September 6, 2012; final manuscript received December 20, 2012; published online June 10, 2013. Assoc. Editor: Umberto Desideri.

J. Fuel Cell Sci. Technol 10(4), 044501 (Jun 10, 2013) (5 pages) Paper No: FC-12-1090; doi: 10.1115/1.4024566 History: Received September 06, 2012; Revised December 20, 2012

The increasing use of unattended sensors by the Information, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance community requires the development of higher power and energy density sources to provide increased capabilities and operation time while minimizing size and weight. Among the emerging power sources, fuel cell (FC) systems potentially offer an improved alternative to existing solutions. The Communications and Electronics Research and Development and Engineering Center/Command, Power & Integration Directorate/Army Power Division's Power Sources branch has been evaluating fuel cells to meet tactical power military applications. Testing of methanol based FC systems indicates 50% weight savings over a secondary Li-ion rechargeable system at 200 W h, and 30% weight savings over a primary Li battery at 600 W h. However, significant technical barriers to fuel cell based power sources for sensor deployment exist, including requirements for additional size and weight reduction to meet portable sensor design requirements. Additionally, testing of FC systems demonstrate the importance of appropriate battery hybridization to maintain load following as well as increasing system power density. A comparison of a Reformed Methanol FC system and a Direct Methanol FC system was also completed, and results for the system size, weight, and fuel consumption are similar for both technologies. To examine the benefits of larger power fuel cells appropriate for stationary unattended sensor use, a comparison of power and weight available from a solar/battery hybrid system versus a solar/battery/RMFC hybrid system was also completed. Although the solar/battery hybrid system's size and weight are larger than the hybrid system with an FC unit, 14 kg versus 8 kg, respectively, there is significant logistic burden when utilizing a FC system due to its methanol refueling requirement.

Copyright © 2013 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Walsh, D., 2012, “Ground Sensors Play Key Role in Battlefield Snooping,” Defense Systems, August 2012, pp 36–38.
L-3 Communication Systems, “REMBASS-II/AN/GSR-8(V): Remotely Monitored Battlefield Sensor System—II,” datasheet, http://www2.l-3com.com/cs-east/pdf/rembassii.pdf
L-3 Communication Systems, “BAIS AN/PRS-9-Battlefield Anti-Intrusion System,” data sheet.
ARA Sensor Systems, “E-UGS Expendable Unattended Ground Sensors,” data sheet.
Tenney, S., Mays, B., Hillis, D., Tran-Luu, D., Houser, J., and Reiff, C., 2004, “Acoustic Mortar Localization System Results From OIF,” Defense Technical Information Center, Fort Belvoir, VA.
Viveiros, E., Wellman, R., Clark, J., Tahmoush, D., Silvious, J., Kurtz, J., Wikner, D., Adler, E., 2010, “An Unattended, Unmanned, and Man-Portable Tactical Doppler Radar,” 2010 Tri-Service Radar Symposium, Orlando, FL, June 21–25.
Textron Defense Systems, “MicroObserver®—Textron Defense Systems' Suite of Unattended Ground Sensors,” data sheet.
Pandya, N., “The Power of Slew-to-Cue Surveillance Capability,” FLIR Systems Inc., Technical Notes, http://gs.flir.com/surveillance-products/surveillance-technology/radar-technotes/slew-to-cue-surveillance
Morse, J. D., 2007, “Micro-Fuel Cell Power Sources,” Int. J. Energy Res., 31, pp. 576–602. [CrossRef]
Novoa, J., Shah, S., Jong, M.de, Dominick, M., and Kowal, J. J., 2009, “US Army CERDEC Field Evaluation and Testing of Soldier and Man-Portable Fuel Cell Power Sources,” 2009 Fuel Cell Seminar & Expo, Palm Springs, CA, November 16–19.
Xie, C., Bostaph, J., and Pavio, J., 2004, “Development of a 2W Direct Methanol Fuel Cell Power Source,” J. Power Source, 136(1), pp. 55–65. [CrossRef]
Mench, M., 2008, Fuel Cell Engines, John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ, pp. 343–350.
Park, J.-Y., Seo, Y., Kang, S., You, D., Cho, H., and Na, Y., 2012, “Operational Characteristics of the Direct Methanol Fuel Cell Stack on Fuel and Energy Efficiency With Performance and Stability,” Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 37(7), pp. 5946–5957. [CrossRef]
Carlstrom, C., 2011, “Commercialization of 1 Watt Consumer Electronics Power Pack,” Project ID: H2RA001, DOE H2 & Fuel Cells Program Report 2011 Annual Merit Review, http://www.hydrogen.energy.gov/annual_review11_arra.html
Pearson, K., 2011, “Forward Deployable Renewable Energy,” Joint Service Power Expo 2011, Myrtle Beach, SC, May 2–5.
Motyka, T., 2011, “Development of High Capacity Portable Power Systems,” 2011 Fuel Cell Seminar Orlando, FL, October 31–November 3.
Bender, G., Angelo, M., Bethune, K., Dorn, S., Thampan, T., and Rocheleaua, R., 2009, “Method Using Gas Chromatography to Determine the Molar Flow Balance for Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells Exposed to Impurities,” J. Power Source, 193(2), pp. 713–722. [CrossRef]
SAFT, “Primary Lithium Battery LS 17500, Document No 31029-2-0710,” data sheet.
NAL Research Corporation, 2012, “General Description of Model A3LA-RS Version 1.0,” Document No. TN2012-02-V1.0 2012.
Palo, D., Dagle, R., and Holladay, J., 2007, “Methanol Steam Reforming for Hydrogen Production,” Chem. Rev., 107, pp. 3992–4021. [CrossRef]
Ratcliff, M., Posey, F., Johnson, D., and Chum, H., 1985, “Operational Study of a Phosphoric Acid Fuel Cell With Hydrogen and Methanol/Steam,” J. Electrochem. Soc., 132(3), pp. 577–582. [CrossRef]


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Comparison of power capabilities of a DMFC (1 W) versus Li-ion and LiCFx chemistry

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Network-centric operation of sensors enabling larger standoff distance to threats. Individual sensors can be deployed forward with minimized SWaP parameters as SWaP intensive components are in gateway node and slew to cue systems.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Fuel cell system response to step load increase. When load is increased from 5 to 47 W, fuel cell system requires 100 s to reach new steady state value. System response limited by fuel processing subsystem.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Representative description of a RMFC fuel loop subsystem

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

RMFC/battery response to step load increase. To maximize lifetime, the FC system is limited to peak load changes >7 s. The use of an external 80 W h battery allows uninterrupted load following by the system.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

DMFC hybridized with a battery to provide 5× power increase. DMFC charges battery and shuts down when battery fully charged. Battery meets increased power requirements until it is depleted, when load is cut off and DMFC recharges battery.



Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In