Research Papers

Parametric Sensitivity Tests—European Polymer Electrolyte Membrane Fuel Cell Stack Test Procedures

[+] Author and Article Information
Samuel Simon Araya

Department of Energy Technology,
Aalborg University,
Aalborg Øst 9220, Denmark
e-mail: ssa@et.aau.dk

Søren Juhl Andreasen

Department of Energy Technology,
Aalborg University,
Aalborg Øst 9220, Denmark
e-mail: sja@et.aau.dk

Søren Knudsen Kær

Department of Energy Technology,
Aalborg University,
Aalborg Øst 9220, Denmark
e-mail: skk@et.aau.dk

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Advanced Energy Systems Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF FUEL CELL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY. Manuscript received May 28, 2014; final manuscript received August 13, 2014; published online November 14, 2014. Editor: Nigel M. Sammes.

J. Fuel Cell Sci. Technol 11(6), 061007 (Dec 01, 2014) (7 pages) Paper No: FC-14-1067; doi: 10.1115/1.4028949 History: Received May 28, 2014; Revised August 13, 2014; Online November 14, 2014

As fuel cells are increasingly commercialized for various applications, harmonized and industry-relevant test procedures are necessary to benchmark tests and to ensure comparability of stack performance results from different parties. This paper reports the results of parametric sensitivity tests performed based on test procedures proposed by a European project, StackTest. The sensitivity of a Nafion®-based low temperature PEMFC stack's performance to parametric changes was the main objective of the tests. Four crucial parameters for fuel cell operation were chosen; relative humidity (RH), temperature, pressure, and stoichiometry at varying current density. Furthermore, procedures for polarization curve recording were also tested both in ascending and descending current directions.

Copyright © 2014 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Wang, P., 2011, “A Brief History of Standards and Standardization Organizations: A Chinese Perspective,” East-West Center, Honolulu, HI, http://hdl.handle.net/10125/21412
ISO Standards, 2014, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland, http://www.iso.org/iso/standards
Bloom, I., Basco, J. K., Walker, L. K., Malkow, T., DeMarco, G., Saturnio, A., and Tsotridis, G., 2013, “Fuel Cell Testing Protocols: An International Perspective,” European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Institute for Energy and Transport, Petten, The Netherlands, http://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/111111111/28594
DOE, 2007, “DOE Cell Component Accelerated Stress Test Protocols for PEM Fuel Cells,” U.S. Department of Energy, Washington, DC, http://www1.eere.energy.gov/hydrogenandfuelcells/fuelcells/pdfs/component_durability_profile.pdf
DOE, 2009, “Procedures For Performing PEM Single Cell Testing,” U.S. Department of Energy, Washington, DC, http://www1.eere.energy.gov/hydrogenandfuelcells/pdfs/htmwg_may09_pem_single_cell_testing.pdf
Joint Research Centre, “Fuel Cell Systems Testing, Safety & Quality Assurance (FCTESQA),” European Commission, Brussels, Belgium, http://iet.jrc.ec.europa.eu/fuel-cells/about-fctesqa-project
Seeliger, D., Hartnig, C., and Spohr, E., 2005, “Aqueous Pore Structure and Proton Dynamics in Solvated Nafion Membranes,” Electrochim. Acta, 50(21), pp. 4234–4240. [CrossRef]
Jeon, D. H., Kim, K. N., Baek, S. M., and Nam, J. H., 2011, “The Effect of Relative Humidity of the Cathode on the Performance and the Uniformity of PEM Fuel Cells,” Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 36(19), pp. 12499–12511. [CrossRef]
Zhang, J., Tang, Y., Song, C., Xia, Z., Li, H., Wang, H., and Zhang, J., 2008, “PEM Fuel Cell Relative Humidity (RH) and Its Effect on Performance at High Temperatures,” Electrochim. Acta, 53(16), pp. 5315–5321. [CrossRef]
Wang, L., 2003, “A Parametric Study of PEM Fuel Cell Performances,” Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 28(11), pp. 1263–1272. [CrossRef]
Zhang, J., Wu, J., and Zhang, H., 2013, PEM Fuel Cell Testing and Diagnosis, 1st ed., Elsevier, Oxford, UK.
Sreenivasulu, B., and Vasu, G., 2012, “Effect of Back Pressure and Flow Geometry on PEM Fuel Cell Performance—An Experimental Study,” Int. J. Appl. Sci. Eng., 11(1), pp. 1–11, available at: http://www.cyut.edu.tw/~ijase/2013/11(1)/11(1)-1_en.htm
Gelfi, S., Stefanopoulou, A. G., Pukrushpan, J. T., and Peng, H., 2003, “Dynamics of Low-Pressure and High Pressure Fuel Cell Air Supply Systems,” American Control Conference, Denver, CO, June 4–6, pp. 2049–2054. [CrossRef]
Zhang, S., Yuan, X., Wang, H., Merida, W., Zhu, H., Shen, J., Wu, S., and Zhang, J., 2009, “A Review of Accelerated Stress Tests of MEA Durability in PEM Fuel Cells,” Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 34(1), pp. 388–404. [CrossRef]
Wu, J., Yuan, X. Z., Martin, J. J., Wang, H., Zhang, J., Shen, J., Wu, S., and Merida, W., 2008, “A Review of PEM Fuel Cell Durability: Degradation Mechanisms and Mitigation Strategies,” J. Power Sources, 184(1), pp. 104–119. [CrossRef]
Bloom, I., Walker, L., Basco, J., Malkow, T., De Marco, G., Tsotridis, G., Williams, M., and Garland, N., 2011, “A Comparison of Fuel Cell Test Protocols,” ECS Trans., 30(1), pp. 227–235. [CrossRef]
Bloom, I., Walker, L. K., Basco, J. K., Malkow, T., Saturnio, A., De Marco, G., and Tsotridis, G., 2013, “A Comparison of Fuel Cell Testing Protocols—A Case Study: Protocols Used by the U.S. Department of Energy, European Union, International Electrotechnical Commission/Fuel Cell Testing and Standardization Network, and Fuel Cell Technical Team,” J. Power Sources, 243, pp. 451–457. [CrossRef]


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Effects of RH on stack performance for different load values. Solid lines show anode RH and dashed lines show cathode RH.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Deviation of RH values from set points

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Measured temperatures at different load values. Solid lines show coolant inlet temperature and dashed lines show the coolant outlet temperature.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Effects of temperature on stack performance at different load values

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Effects of pressure on stack performance at varying current densities

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Effects of fuel stoichiometry on stack performance at different load values

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Effects of oxidant stoichiometry on stack performance at different load values

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Polarization curves at different operating conditions, measured both in descending and ascending current directions

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Measurements conducted according to the StackTest project's proposed measurement steps for polarization curves

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

All three polarization curves. A, B, and C refer to the three different curves in Fig. 8.



Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In