Research Papers

Ex Situ Characterization Method for Flooding in Gas Diffusion Layers and Membrane Electrode Assemblies With a Hydrophilic Gas Diffusion Layer

[+] Author and Article Information
Toshihiro Tanuma

Research Center,
Asahi Glass Co., Ltd.,
1150 Hazawa-cho, Kanagawa-ku,
Yokohama-shi, Kanagawa 221-8755, Japan
e-mail: toshihiro-tanuma@agc.com

Contributed by the Advanced Energy Systems Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF FUEL CELL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY. Manuscript received February 20, 2014; final manuscript received October 26, 2015; published online November 17, 2015. Editor: Wilson K. S. Chiu.

J. Fuel Cell Sci. Technol 12(6), 061002 (Nov 17, 2015) (6 pages) Paper No: FC-14-1023; doi: 10.1115/1.4031917 History: Received February 20, 2014; Revised October 26, 2015

Proper water management is required for the operation of polymer electrolyte fuel cells (PEFCs), in order to maintain the critical balance between adequate membrane hydration and prevention of water flooding in the catalyst layer. In PEFCs, the membrane electrode assembly (MEA) is sandwiched between two gas diffusion layers (GDLs). In addition, a microporous layer (MPL) is generally applied to the GDL substrates for better water removal from the cathode catalyst layer. This paper is the first to report on an ex situ characterization method for water flooding in GDLs. As the humidity of O2 gas on the substrate side of the GDL was increased in incremental steps, O2 gas began to diffuse into the MPL side of the GDL. When the O2 relative humidity exceeded the dew point, water flooding was observed on the surface of the MPL and the O2 concentration dropped sharply because the O2 diffusion was suppressed by the produced liquid water. When comparing to the estimated mass transfer loss based on the actual polarization curves of an MEA using the GDL, it was found that the decrease in the O2 concentration on the MPL side of the GDL can be used as an index of water flooding in the PEFC.

Copyright © 2015 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Frank Bruijn, A. , and Janssen, G. M. , 2013, “ PEM Fuel Cell Materials: Costs, Performance and Durability,” Fuel Cells, K.-D. Kreuer , ed., Springer, New York, pp. 249–303.
Wang, Y. , Chen, K. S. , Mishler, J. , Cho, S. C. , and Adroher, X. C. , 2011, “ A Review of Polymer Electrolyte Membrane Fuel Cells: Technology, Applications, and Needs on Fundamental Research,” Appl. Energy, 88(4), pp. 981–1007. [CrossRef]
Peighambardoust, S. J. , Rowshanzamir, S. , and Amjadi, M. , 2010, “ Review of the Proton Exchange Membranes for Fuel Cell Applications,” Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 35(17), pp. 9349–9384. [CrossRef]
Tsushima, S. , Ikeda, T. , Koido, T. , and Hirai, S. , 2010, “ Investigation of Water Distribution in a Membrane in an Operating PEMFC by Environmental MRI: I. Effects of Operating Conditions,” J. Electrochem. Soc., 157(12), pp. B1814–B1818. [CrossRef]
Stumper, J. , Löhr, M. , and Hamada, S. , 2005, “ Diagnostic Tools for Liquid Water in PEM Fuel Cells,” J. Power Sources, 143(1–2), pp. 150–157. [CrossRef]
Satija, R. , Jacobson, D. L. , Arif, M. , and Werner, S. A. , 2004, “ In Situ Neutron Imaging Technique for Evaluation of Water Management Systems in Operating PEM Fuel Cells,” J. Power Sources, 129(2), pp. 238–245. [CrossRef]
Hakenjos, A. , Muenter, H. , Wittstadt, U. , and Hebling, C. , 2004, “ A PEM Fuel Cell for Combined Measurement of Current and Temperature Distribution, and Flow Field Flooding,” J. Power Sources, 131(1–2), pp. 213–216. [CrossRef]
Le Canut, J.-M. , Abouatallah, R. M. , and Harrington, D. A. , 2006, “ Detection of Membrane Drying, Fuel Cell Flooding, and Anode Catalyst Poisoning on PEMFC Stacks by Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy,” J. Electrochem. Soc., 153(5), pp. A857–A864. [CrossRef]
Barbir, F. , Gorgun, H. , and Wang, X. , 2005, “ Relationship Between Pressure Drop and Cell Resistance as a Diagnostic Tool for PEM Fuel Cells,” J. Power Sources, 141(1), pp. 96–101. [CrossRef]
He, W. , Lin, G. , and Van Nguyen, T. , 2003, “ Diagnostic Tool to Detect Electrode Flooding in Proton-Exchange-Membrane Fuel Cells,” AIChE J., 49(12), pp. 3221–3228. [CrossRef]
Stumper, J. , Campbell, S. A. , Wilkinson, D. P. , and Johnson, M. C. , and Davis, M. , 1998, “ In-Situ Methods for the Determination of Current Distributions in PEM Fuel Cells,” Electrochim. Acta, 43(24), pp. 3773–3783. [CrossRef]
Blanco, M. , and Wilkinson, D. P. , 2010, “ Diffusion Layers,” Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells, Materials Properties and Performance, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, pp. 190–303.
Tanuma, T. , and Kinoshita, S. , 2014, “ Impact of Cathode Fabrication on Fuel Cell Performance,” J. Electrochem. Soc., 161, pp. F94–F98. [CrossRef]
Tanuma, T. , and Kinoshita, S. , 2012, “ Impact of Gas Diffusion Layers (GDLs) on Water Transport in PEFCs,” J. Electrochem. Soc., 159(2), pp. B150–B154. [CrossRef]
Tanuma, T. , and Kinoshita, S. , 2012, “ Impact of Gas Diffusion Layers (GDLs) on MEA Performance in PEFCs,” Energy Procedia, 28, pp. 12–19. [CrossRef]
Owejan, J. P. , Owejan, J. E. , Gu, W. B. , Trabold, T. A. , Tighe, T. W. , and Mathias, M. F. , 2010, “ Water Transport Mechanisms in PEMFC Gas Diffusion Layers,” J. Electrochem. Soc., 157(10), pp. B1456–B1464. [CrossRef]
Prasanna, M. , Ha, H. Y. , Cho, E. A. , Hong, S. A. , and Oh, I . H. , 2004, “ Influence of Cathode Gas Diffusion Media on the Performance of the PEMFCs,” J. Power Sources, 131(1–2), pp. 147–154. [CrossRef]


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Flow schematic in a MVDP (reproduced with the permission of Seika Corporation)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Gas diffusion through a GDL sample in the measuring chamber

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Cooling metal block and the MPL surface after flooding

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Flooding simulation in the measuring chamber

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

GDLs and MEAs used for flooding evaluation

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

(a)–(c) Change in O2 concentration resulting from change in O2 relative humidity

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Decrease in O2 concentration from the initial value at 0% RH to that at 24, 43, and 57% RH

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Pore size distribution of GDLs 1–3

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Typical polarization curves of a PEFC

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

(a)–(c) Polarization curves and mass transfer loss for MEAs 1–3

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Comparison of estimated mass transfer loss for MEAs 1–3 and the decrease in O2 concentration measured by the MVDP



Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In