A new proton exchange membrane (PEM) has been fabricated using a novel patented polymer structure modification technology. It has been shown that the new membrane has a higher proton transfer rate and lower resistance as compared to Nafion®. This paper discusses issues related to membrane fabrication and testing procedures. (i) A brief fabrication procedure of PEM is outlined. The fabrication technique used here separates the proton exchange and structural requirements of the PEM allowing greater flexibility in membrane design. The proton exchange material developed herein is a terpolymer composed of various ratios of acrylic acid, styrene, and vinylsulfonic acid. Following a patented polymer structure modification technology, these materials were bound to an ethylene-tetrafluoroethylene copolymer mesh that had been rendered adhesive by hydroxylation in a two-step water-borne process. (ii) A previously developed theoretical model is used to calculate the relative resistance and proton transfer rate. According to the model, a simple second order differential equation describes the entire process and established a relationship between the membrane resistance and the total time taken for a specific amount of protons to pass through it. Finally, (iii) a simple two-cell experimental procedure is developed to calculate the relative membrane resistance and proton transfer capacity. The results show that theoretical predictions are in excellent agreement with the experimental observations. The new membrane could transfer protons approximately 80% faster than Nafion® per unit area under the test conditions utilized. Membrane resistance is also 71% lower compared to Nafion®. These results suggest that there is now a new route of fabricating cost effective proton exchange membranes for fuel cell applications wherein one may focus more on the proton exchange capacity of the membrane allowing the structural properties of the membrane to be considered separately.

1.
Larminie
,
J.
, and
Dicks
,
A.
, 2000,
Fuel Cell Systems Explained
,
Wiley
,
New York
.
2.
Bard
,
A. J.
, and
Faulkner
,
L. R.
, 2001,
Electrochemical Methods: Fundamentals and Applications
,
Wiley
,
New York
.
3.
Nafion®, E. I. DuPont de Nemours and Company, Wilmington, DE.
4.
Yang
,
C.
,
Srinivasan
,
S.
,
Bocarsly
,
A. B.
,
Tulyani
,
S.
, and
Benziger
,
J. B.
, 2004, “
A Comparison of Physical Properties and Fuel Cell Performance of Nafion® and Zirconium Phosphate/Nafion® Composite Membranes
,”
J. Membr. Sci.
0376-7388,
237
, pp.
145
161
.
5.
Barendrech
,
E.
, 1993,
Fuel Cell Systems
,
L. J. M. J.
Blomen
and
M. N.
Mugerwa
, eds.,
Plenum
,
New York
, p.
614
.
6.
Srinivasan
,
S.
,
Dave
,
B. B.
,
Murugesamoorthi
,
K. A.
,
Parthasarathy
,
A.
, and
Appleby
,
A. J.
, 1993, “
Overview of Fuel Cell Technology
,”
Fuel Cell Systems
,
L. J. M. J.
Blomen
and
M. N.
Mugerwa
, eds.,
Plenum
,
New York
, pp.
37
72
.
7.
Ravikumar
,
M. K.
, and
Shakla
,
A. K.
, 1996, “
Effect of Methanol Crossover in a Liquid-Feed Polymer-Electrolyte Direct Methanol Fuel Cell
,”
J. Electrochem. Soc.
0013-4651,
143
, pp.
2601
2607
.
8.
Küver
,
A.
, and
Vielstich
,
W.
, 1998, “
Investigation of Methanol Crossover and Single Electrode Performance During PEMFC Operation: A Study Using a Solid Polymer Electrolyte Membrane Fuel System
,”
J. Power Sources
0378-7753,
74
, pp.
211
218
.
9.
Pu
,
C.
,
Huang
,
W.
,
Ley
,
K. L.
, and
Smotkin
,
E. S.
, 1995, “
A Methanol Impermeable Proton Conducting Composite Electrolyte System
,”
J. Electrochem. Soc.
0013-4651,
142
, p.
L119
.
10.
Burstein
,
G. T.
,
Barnett
,
C. J.
,
Kucernak
,
A. R.
, and
Williams
,
K. R.
, 1997, “
Aspects of the Anodic Oxidation of Methanol
,”
Catal. Today
0920-5861,
38
, pp.
425
437
.
11.
Schultz
,
T.
,
Zhou
,
S.
, and
Sundmacher
,
K.
, 2001, “
Current Status of and Recent Developments in the Direct Methanol Fuel Cell
,”
Chem. Eng. Technol.
0930-7516,
24
, pp.
1223
1233
.
12.
Barbir
,
F.
, and
Gomez
,
T.
, 1996, “
Efficiency and Economics of Proton Exchange Membrane (PEM) Fuel Cells
,”
Int. J. Hydrogen Energy
0360-3199,
21
, pp.
891
901
.
13.
Smitha
,
B.
,
Sridhar
,
S.
, and
Khan
,
A. A.
, 2005, “
Solid Polymer Electrolyte Membranes for Fuel Cell Applications: A Review
,”
J. Membr. Sci.
0376-7388,
259
, pp.
10
26
.
14.
Neburchilov
,
V.
,
Martin
,
J.
,
Wang
,
H.
, and
Zhang
,
J.
, 2007, “
A Review of Polymer Electrolyte Membranes for Direct Methanol Fuel Cells
,”
J. Power Sources
0378-7753,
169
, pp.
221
238
.
15.
Das
,
S. K.
, and
Berry
,
K. J.
, 2007, “
Two-Cell Theory to Measure Membrane Resistance Based on Proton Flow: Theory Developed and Experimental Validation
,”
J. Power Sources
0378-7753,
173
(
2
), pp.
909
916
.
16.
Beholz
,
L. G.
, 2000, “
Process for Producing Painted Polymeric Articles
,” U.S. Patent No. 6,100,343.
17.
Beholz
,
L. G.
, 2000, “
Process for Producing Painted Polymeric Articles
,” U.S. Patent No. 6,077,913.
18.
Beholz
,
L. G.
, 2006, “
Apparatus for Treating Polymeric Material to Improve Surface Adhesion
,” U.S. Patent No. 7,022,291.
You do not currently have access to this content.