The present regulatory requirements enforce the modification of the firing modes of existing coal-fired utility boilers and the use of coals different from those originally designed for these boilers. The reduction in SO2 and NOx emissions was the primary motivation for these changes. Powder river basin (PRB) coals, classified as subbituminous ranked coals, can lower NOx and SOx emissions from power plants due to their high volatile content and low sulfur content, respectively. On the other hand, PRB coals have also high moisture content, low heating value, and low fusion temperature. Therefore when a power plant switches from the designed coal to a PRB coal, operational challenges were encountered. A major problem that can occur when using these coals is the severe slagging and excess fouling on the heat exchanger surfaces. Not only is there an insulating effect from deposit, but there is also a change in reflectivity of the surface. Excess furnace fouling and high reflectivity ash may cause reduction in heat transfer in the furnace, which results in higher furnace exit gas temperatures (FEGTs), especially with opposite wall burners and with a single backpass. Higher FEGTs usually result in higher stack gas temperature, increasing the reheater spray flow and therefore decreasing the boiler efficiency with a higher heat rate of the unit. A successful modification of an existing unit for firing of PRB coals requires the evaluation of the following parameters: (1) capacities or limitations of the furnace size, (2) the type and arrangement of the firing system, (3) heat transfer surface, (4) pulverizers, (5) sootblowers, (6) fans, and (7) airheaters. In the present study we used a comprehensive methodology to make this evaluation for three PRB coals to be potentially fired in a 575 MW tangential-fired boiler.

1.
Bar-Ziv
,
E.
,
Belostok
,
Y.
,
de Botton
,
V.
,
Dyganov
,
G.
,
Korytnyi
,
E.
,
Perelman
,
M.
,
Saveliev
,
R.
,
Shtcherbinin
,
C.
,
Spitz
,
N.
,
Vikhansky
,
A.
, and
Yasur
,
Y.
, 2005, “
Testing and Prediction of Combustion of Coals and Their Blends in a Test Furnace and Utility Boilers: Methodology
,” Clean Combustion Laboratory, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Report No. LCC-100-05.
2.
Bar-Ziv
,
E.
,
de Botton
,
V.
,
Dyganov
,
G.
,
Korytnyi
,
E.
,
Perelman
,
M.
,
Saveliev
,
R.
, and
Spitz
,
N.
, 2006, “
Testing and Prediction of Combustion in a Test Furnace and Utility Boilers: Adaro, a Bituminous South African Coal
,” Clean Combustion Laboratory, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Report No. LCC-102-06.
3.
Bar-Ziv
,
E.
,
de Botton
,
V.
,
Dyganov
,
G.
,
Korytnyi
,
E.
,
Perelman
,
M.
,
Saveliev
,
R.
,
Spitz
,
N.
, and
Chudnovsky
,
B.
, 2005, “
Testing and Prediction of Combustion in a Test Furnace and Utility Boilers: Drummond, a High-Volatile Bituminous Colombian Coal
,” Clean Combustion Laboratory, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Report No. LCC-101-05.
4.
Bar-Ziv
,
E.
,
de Botton
,
V.
,
Dyganov
,
G.
,
Korytnyi
,
E.
,
Perelman
,
M.
,
Saveliev
,
R.
,
Spitz
,
N.
, and
Chudnovsky
,
B.
, 2006, “
Testing and Prediction of Combustion in a Test Furnace and Utility Boilers: Glencore-Russian, a Bituminous Type Russian Coal
,” Clean Combustion Laboratory, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Report No. LCC-103-06.
5.
Bar-Ziv
,
E.
,
de Botton
,
V.
,
Dyganov
,
G.
,
Korytnyi
,
E.
,
Perelman
,
M.
,
Saveliev
,
R.
,
Spitz
,
N.
, and
Chudnovsky
,
B.
, 2006, “
Testing and Prediction of Combustion in a Test Furnace and Utility Boilers: Guasare-Venezuelan, a Bituminous Type Venezuelan Coal
,” Clean Combustion Laboratory, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Report No. LCC-104-06.
6.
Bar-Ziv
,
E.
,
de Botton
,
V.
,
Korytnyi
,
E.
,
Perelman
,
M.
,
Saveliev
,
R.
,
Spitz
,
N.
, and
Chudnovsky
,
B.
, 2007, “
Testing and Prediction of Combustion in a Test Furnace and Utility Boilers: KPC-Melawan, a Sub-Bituminous Indonesian Coal
,” Clean Combustion Laboratory, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Report No. LCC-105-07.
7.
Bar-Ziv
,
E.
,
Berman
,
Y.
,
Davidson
,
B.
,
Korytnyi
,
E.
,
Ohayon
,
E.
,
Perelman
,
M.
, and
Saveliev
,
R.
, 2008, “
Testing and Prediction of Combustion in a Test Furnace and Utility Boilers: Billiton-Prime, a Bituminous South African Coal
,” Clean Combustion Laboratory, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Report No. LCC-106-09.
8.
Spitz
,
N.
,
Saveliev
,
R.
,
Perelman
,
M.
,
Korytnyi
,
E.
,
Chudnovsky
,
B.
,
Talanker
,
A.
, and
Bar-Ziv
,
E.
, 2008, “
Firing a Sub-Bituminous Coal in Pulverized Coal Boilers Configured for Bituminous Coal
,”
Fuel
0016-2361,
87
, pp.
1534
1542
.
9.
Spitz
,
N.
,
Saveliev
,
R.
,
Korytnyi
,
E.
,
Perelman
,
M.
,
Bar-Ziv
,
E.
, and
Chudnovsky
,
B.
, 2007, “
Prediction of Performance and Pollutant Emission From Pulverized Coal Utility Boilers
,”
Electric Power: Generation, Transmission and Efficiency
,
C. M.
Lefebvre
, ed.,
Nova Science Publishers, Inc.
,
Hauppauge, NY, USA
, Chap. 3, pp.
121
170
.
10.
Korytnyi
,
E.
,
Saveliev
,
R.
,
Perelman
,
M.
,
Chudnovsky
,
B.
, and
Bar-Ziv
,
E.
, 2009, “
Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulations of Coal-Fired Utility Boilers: An Engineering Tool
,”
Fuel
0016-2361,
88
, pp.
9
18
.
11.
Chudnovsky
,
B.
,
Levin
,
L.
, and
Talanker
,
A.
, 2001, “
Advanced On-Line Diagnostic for Improvement of Boiler Performance and Reduction of NOx Emission
,”
PowerGen 2001 Conference
, Brussels, Europe (CDROM).
12.
Chudnovsky
,
B.
, and
Talanker
,
A.
, 2004, “
Boiler Performance Prediction When Firing South African KPC and Adaro Coal Blends
,” Israel Electric Company, Report No. 2004-P-121-11.
13.
Chudnovsky
,
B.
, and
Talanker
,
A.
, 2004, “
Boiler Performance Prediction When Firing Drummond Coal and Its Blends
,” Israel Electric Company, Report No. 2004-P-121-14.
14.
Chudnovsky
,
B.
, and
Talanker
,
A.
, 2004, “
Effect of Bituminous Coal Properties on Heat Transfer Characteristic in the Boiler Furnaces
,”
ASME International Mechanical Engineering Conference
, Anaheim, CA.
15.
Chudnovsky
,
B.
, and
Talanker
,
A.
, 2005, “
Boiler Performance Prediction When Firing Adaro Coal
,” Israel Electric Company, Report No. 2004-P-121-15.
16.
Chudnovsky
,
B.
,
Karasina
,
E.
,
Livshits
,
B.
, and
Talanker
,
A.
, 1999, “
Application of Zonal Combustion Model for On-Line Furnace Analysis of 575 MW Tangential Coal Firing Boilers
,”
PowerGen 1999 Conference
, Frankfurt, Germany.
18.
Benetech, Inc.
, “
PRB Coal Slagging Control Product Montgomery
,” Report No. IL 60538, www.benetechusa.com/pdf/CEP/GAM65PRBreflectiveash.pdfwww.benetechusa.com/pdf/CEP/GAM65PRBreflectiveash.pdf.
19.
Exothermic Engineering, LLC
, “
Practical PRB Coal Experiences
,” Technical Paper No. 20424, Missouri City, MO http://www.exoeng.com/papers/paper5.pdfhttp://www.exoeng.com/papers/paper5.pdf.
20.
Karasina
,
E.
,
Livshits
,
B.
,
Chudnovsky
,
B.
,
Talanker
,
A.
, and
Abryutin
,
A.
, 2000, “
Adapting the Code FURNACE for Calculations of Heat Transferring the Boilers Furnace of a 575 MW Power Generation Unit
,”
Therm. Eng.
0040-6015,
47
(
11
), pp.
1031
1036
.
21.
Gelbar
,
D.
, and
Kunkel
,
R.
, 2002,
Boiler Design Considerations for PRB Coal
,
Alstom Power
,
Windsor, CT
.
22.
Tomeczek
,
J.
,
Palugniok
,
H.
, and
Ochman
,
J.
, 2004, “
Modelling of Deposition Formation on Heating Tubes in Pulverized Coal Boilers
,”
Fuel
0016-2361,
83
, pp.
213
221
.
You do not currently have access to this content.