Abstract

Brush seals are plausible replacements for conventional labyrinth seals in gas turbine internal air systems. They can offer superior leakage performance due to their compliant nature and reduced effective clearance during operation. However, highly swirling flow and aerodynamic forces on the upstream bristles could lead to bristle back aero-elastic instability at high-shaft speed locations. Previous research has shown that the bristles in an idealized pack are displaced from their equilibrium position at swirl velocities of 150 m.s−1 and above for a bristle diameter of 0.1 mm. This study investigates grooves as a means of improving brush seal robustness in these locations by reducing inlet swirl incident on the bristle pack. A parametric study of a simple groove geometry was conducted using computational fluid dynamics (CFD) and a porous medium representation of the bristle pack to achieve representative seal leakages. Groove length, width, angle, and pitch were identified as important parameters for swirl reduction. The performance of ribs from previous research can be replicated and improved upon. A design of experiments (DOE) approach was implemented to investigate a novel groove design geometry. Combining a horizontal channel with an inclined groove enables a higher spacing to achieve the same swirl reduction due to drag and flow channeling/mixing effects at the inner radius. The resulting trends indicate that the novel design performs as intended for the selected boundary conditions in substantially reducing inlet swirl, thus helping to mitigate the above risk of premature seal deterioration and failure.

References

1.
Ferguson
,
J. G.
,
1988
, “
Brushes as High Performance Gas Turbine Seals
,”
ASME
Paper No. 88-GT-182.10.1115/88-GT-182
2.
Flower
,
R.
,
1990
, “
Brush Seal Development System
,”
AIAA
Paper No. 90-2143.10.2514/6.90-2143
3.
Chupp
,
R. E.
,
Hendricks
,
R. C.
,
Lattime
,
S. B.
, and
Steinetz
,
B. M.
,
2006
, “
Sealing in Turbomachinery
,”
J. Propul. Power
,
22
(
2
), pp.
313
349
.10.2514/1.17778
4.
Hendricks
,
R. C.
,
Schlumberger
,
S.
,
Braun
,
M. J.
,
Choy
,
F.
, and
Mullen
,
R. L.
,
1991
, “
A Bulk Flow Model of a Brush Seal System
,”
ASME
Paper No. 91-GT-325.10.1115/91-GT-325
5.
Bayley
,
F. J.
, and
Long
,
C. A.
,
1993
, “
A Combined Experimental and Theoretical Study of Flow and Pressure Distributions in a Brush Seal
,”
ASME. J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
115
(
2
), pp.
404
410
.10.1115/1.2906723
6.
Chew
,
J. W.
,
Lapworth
,
B. L.
, and
Millener
,
P. J.
,
1995
, “
Mathematical Modelling of Brush Seals
,”
Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow
,
16
(
6
), pp.
493
500
.10.1016/0142-727X(95)00061-T
7.
Turner
,
M. T.
,
Chew
,
J. W.
, and
Long
,
C. A.
,
1998
, “
Experimental Investigation and Mathematical Modeling of Clearance Brush Seals
,”
ASME. J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
120
(
3
), pp.
573
579
.10.1115/1.2818185
8.
Dogu
,
Y.
, and
Aksit
,
M. F.
,
2006
, “
Effects of Geometry on Brush Seal Pressure and Flow Fields—Part I: Front Plate Configurations
,”
ASME. J. Turbomach.
,
128
(
2
), pp.
367
378
.10.1115/1.2101857
9.
Dogu
,
Y.
, and
Aksit
,
M. F.
,
2006
, “
Effects of Geometry on Brush Seal Pressure and Flow Fields—Part II: Backing Plate Configurations
,”
ASME. J. Turbomach.
,
128
(
2
), pp.
379
389
.10.1115/1.2101858
10.
Helm
,
P.
,
Pugachev
,
A.
, and
Neef
,
M.
,
2008
, “
Breaking the Swirl With Brush Seals: Numerical Modeling and Experimental Evidence
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2008-50257.10.1115/GT2008-50257
11.
Liu
,
Y.
,
Chew
,
J. W.
,
Pekris
,
M. J.
, and
Kong
,
X.
,
2020
, “
The Effect of Inlet Swirl on Brush Seal Bristle Deflections and Stability
,”
ASME. J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
142
(
7
), p.
071002
.10.1115/1.4046696
12.
Liu
,
Y.
,
Dong
,
W.
,
Chew
,
J. W.
,
Pekris
,
M. J.
,
Yue
,
B.
, and
Kong
,
X.
,
2022
, “
Flow Conditioning to Control the Effects of Inlet Swirl on Brush Seal Performance in Gas Turbine Engines
,”
Front. Energy Res.
,
9
, p.
815192
.10.3389/fenrg.2021.815152
13.
Zhao
,
H.
,
Li
,
Y.
,
Sun
,
D.
,
Li
,
Y.
,
Wen
,
S.
, and
Sun
,
J.
,
2023
, “
Inter-Stage Pressure Drop of Multi-Stage Brush Seal With Differentiated Structure
,”
ASME. J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
145
(
7
), p.
071001
.10.1115/1.4056793
14.
Phan
,
H. M.
,
Pekris
,
M. J.
, and
Chew
,
J. W.
,
2024
, “
Insights Into Frictional Brush Seal Hysteresis
,”
ASME. J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
146
(
8
), p.
081010
.10.1115/1.4064151
15.
Stel
,
H.
,
Franco
,
A. T.
,
Junqueira
,
S. L. M.
,
Erthal
,
R. H.
,
Mendes
,
R.
,
Gonçalves
,
M. A. L.
, and
Morales
,
R. E. M.
,
2012
, “
Turbulent Flow in D-Type Corrugated Pipes: Flow Pattern and Friction Factor
,”
ASME. J. Fluids Eng.
,
134
(
12
), p.
121202
.10.1115/1.4007899
16.
Wang
,
Z.
,
Ireland
,
P. T.
,
Kohler
,
S. T.
, and
Chew
,
J. W.
,
1998
, “
Heat Transfer Measurements to a Gas Turbine Cooling Passage With Inclined Ribs
,”
ASME. J. Turbomach.
,
120
(
1
), pp.
63
69
.10.1115/1.2841390
17.
Krishnaiah
,
K.
, and
Shahabudeen
,
P.
,
2012
,
Applied Design of Experiments and Taguchi Methods
,
PHI Learning Private Limited
, New Delhi, India.
You do not currently have access to this content.