The profile errors of conjugate disk cams can be indirectly examined by means of measuring the conjugate condition of the assembled conjugate cam mechanism. This paper demonstrates how to measure the conjugate condition of the assembled conjugate cam mechanism to reveal the cam profile errors and also develops an analytical approach for relating the variation of the conjugate condition with the cam profile errors. For the machined conjugate cams with profile errors, if the subtending angle of the oscillating follower arms is intentionally changed to be variable, the variation of the subtending angle of the follower arms may indicate the variation of profile errors when the cams rotate. According to the magnitude of the subtending angle variation, the profile deviations of conjugate disk cams can be analyzed analytically. The profile errors of a pair of conjugate cams can be evaluated by means of the corresponding motion variation of the indicator reading. For such an examining method, the only required measuring instrument is a dial indicator. A pair of conjugate cams were examined by the method and also measured using a coordinate measuring machine to test the accuracy and efficiency of the method.

1.
Wu
,
L. I.
, 2003, “
Calculating Conjugate Cam Profiles by Vector Equations
,”
Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part C: J. Mech. Eng. Sci.
0954-4062,
217
(
10
), pp.
1117
1123
.
2.
Norton
,
R. L.
, 2002,
Cam Design and Manufacturing Handbook
,
Industrial
,
New York
, pp.
413
419
.
3.
H. A.
Rothbart
, ed., 2004,
Cam Design Handbook
,
McGraw-Hill
,
New York
, pp.
8
9
.
4.
Lin
,
P. D.
, and
Hsieh
,
J. F.
, 2000, “
Dimension Inspection of Spatial Cams by CNC Coordinate Measuring Machines
,”
ASME J. Manuf. Sci. Eng.
1087-1357,
122
(
1
), pp.
149
157
.
5.
Qiu
,
H.
,
Li
,
Y.
,
Cheng
,
K.
, and
Li
,
Y.
, 2000, “
A Practical Evaluation Towards Form Deviation for Two-Dimensional Contours Based on Coordinate Measurement Data
,”
Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf.
0890-6955,
40
(
2
), pp.
259
275
.
6.
Tsay
,
D. M.
,
Tseng
,
K. S.
, and
Chen
,
H. P.
, 2006, “
A Procedure for Measuring Planar Cam Profile and Their Follower Motions
,”
ASME J. Manuf. Sci. Eng.
1087-1357,
128
(
3
), pp.
697
704
.
7.
Koloc
,
Z.
, and
Václavík
,
M.
, 1993,
Cam Mechanisms
,
Elsevier
,
New York
, pp.
411
413
.
8.
Wu
,
L. I.
, and
Chang
,
W. T.
, 2005, “
Analysis of Mechanical Errors in Disc Cam Mechanisms
,”
Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part C: J. Mech. Eng. Sci.
0954-4062,
219
(
2
), pp.
209
224
.
9.
Chang
,
W. T.
, and
Wu
,
L. I.
, 2006, “
Mechanical Error Analysis of Disk Cam Mechanisms With a Flat-Faced Follower
,”
Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology
,
20
(
3
), pp.
345
357
.
10.
Chang
,
W. T.
, 2007, “
Analysis of Mechanical Errors in Planar Cam Mechanisms and Its Applications
,” Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Power Mechanical Engineering, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu, Taiwan.
11.
Rees-Jones
,
J.
, 1978, “
Mechanisms, Cam Cutting Co-Ordinates
,”
Engineering (London)
0013-7782, March, pp.
220
224
.
12.
Davison
,
J. K.
, 1978, “
Calculating Cam Profiles Quickly
,”
Mach. Des.
0024-9114, 7 December, pp.
151
155
.
13.
Hartenberg
,
R. S.
, and
Denavit
,
J.
, 1964,
Kinematic Synthesis of Linkages
,
McGraw-Hill
,
New York
, pp.
59
63
and
315
320
.
14.
Hall
, Jr.,
A. S.
, 1961,
Kinematics and Linkage Design
,
Balt
,
West Lafayette, IN
, pp.
2
3
and
65
67
.
15.
Rees-Jones
,
J.
, 1978, “
Mechanisms, Cam Curvature and Interference
,”
Engineering (London)
0013-7782, May, pp.
460
463
.
16.
Grosjean
,
J.
, 1991,
Kinematics and Dynamics of Mechanisms
,
McGraw-Hill
,
New York
, pp.
267
285
.
17.
Ting
,
K. L.
, and
Long
,
Y.
, 1996, “
Performance Quality and Tolerance Sensitivity of Mechanisms
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
1050-0472,
118
(
1
), pp.
144
150
.
18.
Garrett
,
R. E.
, and
Hall
, Jr.,
A. S.
, 1969, “
Effect of Tolerance and Clearance in Linkage Design
,”
ASME J. Eng. Ind.
0022-0817, Series B
91B
(
1
), pp.
198
202
.
You do not currently have access to this content.