Abstract

This paper describes the development, analysis, testing of a RELAP5-3D system thermal-hydraulics model for a 50-MWel-class pressurized water reactor–small modular reactor (PWR–SMR), similar to that by NuScale Power. This study focuses on a series of sensitivity tests to investigate the impacts of model changes. Parameters considered in the sensitivity study included the surge line junction resistance (SLJR), steam generator (SG) heat transfer area (SGHTA), SG primary flow area (SGPFA), SG secondary pressure (SGSP), and SG secondary flowrate (SGSF). Results for the reference and sensitivity simulations are compared with available design data. The flow in the primary circuit of the PWR–SMR is driven by natural circulation and can be sensitive to changes in hydraulic resistance and pressure drop in system components. Initial analysis results demonstrated significant flow oscillations. As a result of sensitivity studies, it was found that the surge line junction resistance needed to be increased by increasing the form loss coefficient from 4.9 to 30.0, to reduce mass flow oscillation amplitude to less than ±2%. Modifications to the steam generator heat transfer area, primary flow area, or secondary pressure have very little impact in reducing flow oscillations. However, it was found that the steam generator secondary flowrate will affect primary circuit flow oscillations, and when the SGSF was artificially increased from 68 kg/s (design data) to 91 kg/s (a 36% increase), the oscillations were eliminated, along with better matching with design data for core flowrate and inlet/outlet temperatures. Further improvements to the model for the steam generator will be required.

References

1.
International Atomic Energy Agency
,
2020
, “
Advances in Small Modular Reactor Technology Developments
,”
A Supplement to: IAEA an Advanced Reactors Information System (ARIS), 2020 Edition
,
IAEA
,
Vienna, Austria
, accessed Mar. 5, 2022, http://aris.iaea.org
2.
World Nuclear Association
,
2021
, “
Small Nuclear Power Reactors
,” World Nuclear Association, London, accessed Aug. 19, 2021, https://www.world-nuclear.org/information-library/nuclear-fuel-cycle/nuclear-power-reactors/small-nuclear-power-reactors.aspx
3.
Gen IV International Forum,
2022
, “
Generation IV Systems
,” GIF, accessed Mar. 5, 2022, https://www.gen-4.org/gif/jcms/c_59461/generation-iv-systems
4.
Wojtaszek
,
D.
,
2019
, “
Potential Off-Grid Markets for SMRs in Canada
,”
CNL Nucl. Rev.
,
8
(
2
), pp.
87
96
.10.12943/CNR.2017.00007
5.
National Resources Canada
,
2018
, “
SMR Roadmap—Canadian Small Modular Reactor
,” National Resources Canada,
Ottawa, ON, Canada
, accessed Mar. 5, 2022, https://smrroadmap.ca/
6.
Lee
,
K. W.
,
2020
, “
The Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission's Readiness to Regulate Small Modular Reactors
,”
CNL Nucl. Rev.
,
9
(
1
), pp.
99
106
.10.12943/CNR.2019.00005
7.
Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission,
2022
, “
Pre-Licensing Vendor Design Review
,” CNSC,
Ottawa, ON, Canada
, accessed Mar. 5, 2022, http://nuclearsafety.gc.ca/eng/reactors/power-plants/pre-licensing-vendor-design-review/index.cfm
8.
WNN
,
2020
, “
NuScale Makes First Canadian SMR Review Submission
,” World Nuclear News, accessed Mar. 5, 2022, https://world-nuclear-news.org/Articles/NuScale-makes-first-Canadian-SMR-review-submission
9.
United States Government Accountability Office (GAO)
,
Persons
,
T. M.
, and
Rusco
,
F.
,
2015
, “
Technology Assessment: Nuclear Reactors: Status and Challenges in Development and Deployment of New Commercial Concepts
,” GAO, Washington, DC, Report No. GAO-15-652. (This is a work of the U.S. government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States The published product may be reproduced and distributed in its entirety without further permission from GAO).
10.
NuScale Power LLC
,
2018
, “
NuScale Final Safety Analysis Report—Part 2: Tier 2, Revision 1
,” NuScale Power LLC, accessed Mar. 5, 2022, https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML2022/ML20224A493.pdf
11.
Idaho National Laboratory
,
2015
, “RELAP5-3D Code Manual Revision 43,” INL,
Idaho Falls, ID
, accessed Mar. 5, 2022, https://relap53d.inl.gov/SitePages/Home.aspx
12.
Idaho National Laboratory
,
2006
, “RELAP5-3D Code Manual, Revision 2.4, INEEL-EXT-98-00834,”
INL
,
Idaho Falls, ID
, accessed Mar. 5, 2022, https://relap53d.inl.gov/SitePages/Home.aspx
13.
Schultz
,
R. R.
,
2015
, “
RELAP5-3D Code Manual Volume V: User's Guidelines
,” Revision 4.3,
INL
,
Idaho Falls, ID
, Report No. INL/MIS-15-36723.
14.
Roth
,
G.
,
2007
, “
Symbolic Nuclear Analysis Package (SNAP)
,”
Presentation at 2007 International RELAP5 User's Seminar
,
Idaho Falls, ID
, Nov. 7–9.https://relap53d.inl.gov/seminars/idahofalls2007/Shared%20Documents/snap-irug-2007.pdf
15.
ISL
,
2023
, “
SNAP (Symbolic Nuclear Analysis Package)
,” Information Systems Laboratories, accessed June 20, 2023, https://www.islinc.com/products/snap
16.
Freitag
,
P.
,
2018
, “
Transient Thermal-Hydraulic Simulation of a Small Modular Reactor in RELAP 5
,” Master's thesis,
University of Rhode Island
,
Kingston, RI
.
17.
Sadegh-Noedoost
,
A.
,
Faghihi
,
F.
,
Fakhraei
,
A.
, and
Amin-Mozafari
,
M.
,
2020
, “
Investigations of the Fresh-Core Cycle-Length and the Average Fuel Depletion Analysis of the NuScale Core
,”
Ann. Nucl. Energy
,
136
, p.
106995
.10.1016/j.anucene.2019.106995
18.
Pino-Medina
,
S.
, and
Francois
,
J. L.
,
2018
, “
Neutronic Study of the Nuscale Core With Different Fuel Types
,”
Proceedings of PBNC 2018
,
San Francisco, CA
, Sept. 30–Oct. 5, pp.
270
277
.
19.
Kim
,
M. S.
, and
Jeong
,
Y. H.
,
2020
, “
Conceptual Design of Small Modular Reactor Driven by Natural Circulation and Study of Design Characteristics Using CFD & RELAP5 Code
,”
Nucl. Eng. Technol.
,
52
(
12
), pp.
2743
2759
.10.1016/j.net.2020.05.014
20.
Phungky
,
S.
,
Agung
,
A.
, and
Sihana
,
2020
, “
Analysis of Natural Convection Capability in NuScale Primary Cooling Systems With Mixture of Uranium and Plutonium (Mixed Oxide) Fuel Using RELAP5-3D
,”
AIP Conf. Proc.
,
2223
, p.
030002
.
21.
NuScale Power, LLC
,
2020
, “
Status Report—NuScale SMR, May, 2020
,” NuScale Power, LLC, accessed Mar. 5, 2022, https://aris.iaea.org/PDF/NuScale-NPM200_2020.pdf
22.
National Institutes of Standards and Technology,
2023, “
Thermo-Physical Properties of Fluid Systems
,” NIST, Gaitherburg, MD, accessed May 16, 2023, https://webbook.nist.gov/chemistry/fluid/
23.
Johnson
,
K. P.
,
2021
, “
Transient Analysis of the NuScale Power Helical-Coil Steam Generator Tube Rupture Using RELAP5-3D
,” Master's thesis,
University of Rhode Island
,
Kingston, RI
.
24.
Hosseini
,
S. A.
,
Akbari
,
R.
,
Shirani
,
A. S.
, and
D'Auria
,
F.
,
2021
, “
Investigation of the Natural Circulation Flow Map in NuScale Small Modular Reactor
,”
Int. J. Reliab., Risk Saf.: Theory Appl.
,
4
(
1
), pp.
95
100
.10.30699/IJRRS.4.1.12
25.
Xu
,
S. G.
, and
Bromley
,
B. P.
,
2022
, “
Challenges of Small Modular Reactor Used Fuel Management in Canada
,” International Atomic Energy Agency (
IAEA
) Technical Meeting on Back End of the Fuel Cycle Considerations for Small Modular Reactors,
Vienna, Austria
, Sept. 20–23.https://www.researchgate.net/publication/363771709_Challenges_of_Small_Modular_Reactor_Used_Fuel_Management_in_Canada_Presentation
You do not currently have access to this content.