Abstract

This paper discusses permanent deformation of the fuel assembly of pressurized water reactors that have to satisfy a drop time requirement of the control rod assembly. During a seismic event, the fuel assemblies and the reactor core exhibit transient vibration. When the fuel assemblies collide, they develop impact forces in the spacer grids along the fuel assemblies. If the impact forces on some spacer grids of the fuel assembly exceed an allowable strength, the buckling occurs in the corresponding spacer grids, followed by permanent deformation. The geometry change of the buckled spacer grids leads to the movement of the guide tube positions in the fuel assembly. Therefore the geometry change is associated with the distortion of the control rod drop path. In this study, the permanent deformation of the spacer grids was measured during the impact tests, and the maximum deviation of the guide tube from the original position was investigated. Control rod drop tests were also performed to measure the change in drop time according to the deformation of the fuel assembly. Using actuators in the loop test facility, the authors realized the first and second bending mode shapes of the fuel assembly under the flowing water condition. Based on a series of drop tests, the critical fuel assembly deformation was identified that could lead to a violation of an allowable drop time of the control rod.

References

1.
IAEA-TECDOC-1132
,
2000
, “
Control Assembly Materials for Water Reactors: Experience, Performance and Perspectives
,”
Proceedings of a Technical Committee Meeting Held in Vienna
, Oct. 12–15
.
2.
Nourbakhsh
,
H. P.
,
2014
, “
Dealing With Beyond-Design-Basis Accidents in Nuclear Safety Decisions
,”
Proceedings of 12th International Probabilistic Safety Assessment & Management (PSAM 12) Conference
, Honolulu, HI, June 22–27.
3.
Safety of Nuclear Power Plants: Design
,
2016
, “
IAEA Safety Standards Series No. SSR-2/1 (Rev. 1)
,” IAEA, Vienna, Austria
.
4.
Son
,
J. G.
,
Lee
,
J. H.
,
Kim
,
H. W.
,
Kim
,
S. K.
, and
Kim
,
J. B.
,
2019
, “
Influence of Design Modification of Control Rod Assembly for Prototype Generation IV Sodium-Cooled Fast Reactor on Drop Performance
,”
Nucl. Eng. Technol.
,
51
(
3
), pp.
922
929
.10.1016/j.net.2018.11.014
5.
Bruno
,
C.
,
2003
, “
Rod Cluster Control Assembly Drop Kinetic Seismic Excitation
,”
Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Nuclear Engineering (ICONE-11)
, Tokyo, Japan, Apr. 20–23
.
6.
Choi
,
M.
,
Kim
,
G.
,
Sun
,
J.
, and
Cho
,
Y.
,
2016
, “
Seismic Test of the Control Rod Drive Mechanism for JRTR
,”
Trans. Korean Soc. Noise Vib. Eng.
,
26
(
5
), pp.
552
558
.10.5050/KSNVE.2016.26.5.552
7.
Koide
,
Y.
,
Nakagawa
,
M.
,
Fukushi
,
N.
,
Ishigaki
,
H.
, and
Okumura
,
K.
,
2008
, “
Analysis of Dynamic Insertion of Control Rod of BWR Under Seismic Excitation
,”
J. Power Energy Syst., Vol.
,
2
(
4
), pp.
1132
1139
.10.1299/jpes.2.1132
8.
Huang
,
H.
,
Wang
,
Z.
,
Xu
,
W.
,
Liu
,
T.
,
Yang
,
Y.
, and
Li
,
P.
,
2018
, “
Seismic Analysis of PWR Control Rod Drop With the CRDAC Scram Performance Code
,”
Ann. Nucl. Energy
,
114
, pp.
624
633
.
9.
Cheng
,
J.
,
Wang
,
Z.
,
Lu
,
C.
,
Zhang
,
J.
,
Bi
,
S.
, and
Feng
,
Q.
,
2020
, “
Control Rod Drop Hydrodynamic Analysis Based on Numerical Simulation
,”
Front. Energy Res.
, epub
.10.3389/fenrg.2020.601067
10.
Baylor
,
J.
,
Choi
,
J.
,
Touran
,
N.
,
Werner
,
M.
, and
Cohen
,
M.
,
2018
, “
Seismic Analysis of a Full 3D Reactor Core Using Multi-Physics Modeling Methodology
,”
Top Fuel
2018, Prague, Czech, Sept. 30–Oct. 4.https://www.euronuclear.org/archiv/topfuel2018/fullpapers/TopFuel2018-A0247-fullpaper.pdf
11.
Ren
,
M.
, and
Münch
,
C.
,
2013
, “
Predictions of RCCA Drop Times Under Consideration of Fuel Assembly Distortions
,” 22nd Conference on Structural Mechanics in Reactor Technology (
SMiRT 22
), San Francisco, CA, Aug. 18–23
.https://repository.lib.ncsu.edu/bitstream/handle/1840.20/32869/Pap_779_ver_2.pdf?sequence=1
12.
NUREG-0800 Revision 03
,
2007
,
Standard Review Plan
,
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
, Washington, DC.
13.
Information Notice No.96-12
,
1996
,
Control Rod Insertion Problems
,
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
, Washington, DC.
14.
Schmidt
,
J.
,
2015
, “
Identifying the Need to Revise Industry and Staff Guidance for the Evaluation of Fuel Assembly Structural Responses to Externally Applied Forces Based on Recent Review Experience
,” Top Fuel 2015, Zurich, Switzerland, Sept. 13–17, pp.
450
456
.
15.
IAEA-TECDOC-1454
,
2005
, “
Structural Behaviour of Fuel Assemblies for Water Cooled Reactors
,” IAEA TECDOC Series, Vienna, Austria
.
16.
Park
,
N.
,
Yoo
,
Y.
,
Kim
,
T.
, and
Jeon
,
S.
,
2022
, “
Development of a Simplified Pressurized Water Reactor Fuel Assembly Nonlinear Model
,”
ASME J. Pressure Vessel Technol.
,
144
(
5
), p. 051304.10.1115/1.4053481
17.
Zeman
,
Z.
, and
Hlaváč
,
V.
,
2014
, “
Seismic Response of Nuclear Fuel Assembly
,”
Appl. Comput. Mech.
,
8
(
1
), pp.
35
46
.
18.
Pellissetti
,
M.
,
Kessler
,
H.
,
Schmidl
,
J.
,
Nykyforchyn
,
A.
, and
Akcay
,
S. S.
,
2019
, “
Seismic Performance of Fuel Assemblies Based on Intensity-Compatible Sets of Recorded Ground Motion Time Histories
,” 25th Conference on Structural Mechanics in Reactor Technology (
SMiRT 25
), Charlotte, NC, Aug. 4–9
.https://repository.lib.ncsu.edu/bitstream/handle/1840.20/37727/IV_861_Manuel_Pellissetti.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
19.
Eurachem/CITAC Guide,
2012
,
Quantifying Uncertainty in Analytical Measurement
, 3rd ed.,
141
pages.
You do not currently have access to this content.