Vessels moored in deep water may require buoys to support part of the weight of the mooring lines. The effects that size and location of supporting buoys have on the dynamics of spread mooring systems (SMS) at different water depths are assessed by studying the slow motion nonlinear dynamics of the system. Stability analysis and bifurcation theory are used to determine the changes in SMS dynamics in deep water based as functions of buoy parameters. Catastrophe sets in a two-dimensional parametric design space are developed from bifurcation boundaries, which separate regions of qualitatively different dynamics. Stability analysis defines the morphogeneses occurring as bifurcation boundaries are crossed. The mathematical model of the moored vessel consists of the horizontal plane—surge, sway, and yaw—fifth-order, large-drift, low-speed maneuvering equations. Mooring lines made of chains are modeled quasi-statically as catenaries supported by buoys including nonlinear drag and touchdown. Steady excitation from current, wind, and mean wave drift are modeled. Numerical applications are limited to steady current and show that buoys affect both the static and dynamic loss of stability of the system, and may even cause chaotic response.

1.
Davison, N. J., Thomas, N. T., Nienhus, V., and Pinkster, J. A., 1987, “Application of an Alternative Concept in Dynamic Positioning to a Tanker Floating Production System,” Proc. 19th Annual Offshore Technology Conference, OTC Paper No. 5444, Houston, TX, Apr. pp. 207–223.
2.
Pinkster, J. A., and Nienhus, V., 1986, “Dynamic Positioning of Large Tankers at Sea,” Proc. 18th Annual Offshore Technology Conference, OTC Paper No. 5208, Houston, TX, May, pp. 459–476.
3.
Bernitsas
,
M. M.
, and
Garza-Rios
,
L. O.
,
1996
, “
Effect of Mooring Line Arrangement on the Dynamics of Spread Mooring Systems
,”
ASME J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng.
,
118
, Feb. pp.
7
200
.
4.
Bernitsas
,
M. M.
, and
Garza-Rios
,
L. O.
,
1997
, “
Mooring System Design Based on Analytical Expressions of Catastrophes of Slow-Motion Dynamics
,”
ASME J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng.
,
119
, May, pp.
86
95
.
5.
Bernitsas M. M., and Papoulias, F. A., 1990, “Nonlinear Stability and Maneuvering Simulation of Single Point Mooring Systems,” Proc. Offshore Station Keeping Symposium, SNAME, Houston, TX, February 1–2, pp. 1–19.
6.
Chung
,
J. S.
, and
Bernitsas
,
M. M.
,
1992
, “
Dynamics of Two-Line Ship Towing/Mooring Systems: Bifurcations, Singularities of Stability Boundaries, Chaos
,”
J. Ship Res.
,
36
, No.
2
, June, pp.
93
105
.
7.
Fernandes, A. C., and Aratanha, M., 1996, “Classical Assessment to the Single Point Mooring and Turret Dynamics Stability Problems,” Proc. 15th International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering (OMAE), Vol. I-A, Florence, Italy, June, pp. 423–430.
8.
Garza-Rios, L. O., and Bernitsas, M. M., 1997, “Nonlinear Slow Motion Dynamics of Turret Mooring Systems in Deep Water,” Proc. 8th International Conference on the Behavior of Offshore Structures (BOSS), Delft, the Netherlands, July, pp. 177–188.
9.
Garza-Rios
,
L. O.
,
Bernitsas
,
M. M.
,
Nishimoto
,
K.
, and
Masetti
,
I. Q.
,
1999
, “
Preliminary Design of Differentiated Compliance Anchoring Systems
,”
ASME J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng.
,
121
, Feb, pp.
9
15
.
10.
Gottlieb
,
O.
, and
Kim
,
S. C. S.
,
1992
, “
Nonlinear Oscillations, Bifurcations and Chaos in a Multi-Point Mooring System with a Geometric Nonlinearity
,”
J. Appl. Ocean Res.
,
14
, pp.
832
839
.
11.
Leite
,
A. J. P.
,
Aranha
,
J. A. P.
,
Umeda
,
C.
, and
de Conti
,
M. B.
,
1998
, “
Current Forces in Tankers and Bifurcation of Equilibrium of Turret Systems: Hydrodynamic Model and Experiments
,”
J. Appl. Ocean Res.
,
20
, pp.
145
156
.
12.
Nishimoto, K., Brinati, H. L. and Fucatu, C. H., 1997, “Dynamics of Moored Tankers SPM and Turret,” Proc. Seventh International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference (ISOPE), Vol. 1, Honolulu, pp. 370–378.
13.
Papoulias
,
F. A.
, and
Bernitsas
,
M. M.
,
1988
, “
Autonomous Oscillations, Bifurcations, and Chaotic Response of Moored Vessels
,”
J. Ship Res.
,
32
, No.
3
, Sept, pp.
220
228
.
14.
Sharma, S. D., Jiang, T., and Schellin, T. E., 1988, “Dynamic Instability and Chaotic Motions of a Single Point Moored Tanker,” Proc. 17th ONR Symposium on Naval Hydrodynamics, The Hague, Holland, Aug. pp. 543–562.
15.
Takashina
,
J.
,
1986
, “
Ship Maneuvering Motion due to Tugboats and its Mathematical Model
,”
J. Soc. Naval Architects of Japan
,
160
, pp.
93
104
.
16.
Tanaka
,
S.
,
1995
, “
On the Hydrodynamic Forces Acting on a Ship at Large Drift Angles
,”
J. West Soc. Naval Arch. Jpn.
,
91
, pp.
81
94
.
17.
Garza-Rios, L. O., and Bernitsas, M. M., 1999, “Slow Motion Dynamics of Mooring Systems in Deep Water With Buoy Supported Catenary Lines,” Report No. 339, University of Michigan/Industry Consortium in Offshore Engineering, Department of Naval Architecture and Marine Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, Jan.
18.
Garza-Rios, L. O., Bernitsas, M. M., and Nishimoto, K., 1997, “Catenary Mooring Lines With Nonlinear Drag and Touchdown,” Report No. 333, University of Michigan, Department of Naval Architecture and Marine Engineering, Ann Arbor, MI, Jan.
19.
Papoulias, F. A., and Bernitsas, M. M., 1988, “MOORLINE: A Program for Static Analysis of MOORing LINEs,” Report to the University of Michigan/Sea Grant/Industry Consortium in Offshore Engineering, and Department of Naval Architecture and Marine Engineering, The University of Michigan, Ann. Arbor, MI, Publication No. 309, May.
20.
Nishimoto, K., Kaster, F., and Aranha, J. A. P., 1996, “Full Scale Decay Test of a Moored Tanker, ALAGOAS-DICAS System,” Report to Petrobra´s, Brazil, Feb.
21.
Guckenheimer, J., and Holmes, P., Nonlinear Oscillations, Dynamical Systems, and Bifurcations of Vector Fields, Springer-Verlag, New York, NY.
22.
Wiggins, S., 1990, Introduction to Applied Nonlinear Dynamical Systems and Chaos, Springer-Verlag, New York, NY.
23.
Nippon Kaiji Kyokai, 1983, Guide to Mooring Systems, N. K. K., Tousei, Tokyo, Japan.
You do not currently have access to this content.