The stress response of an artillery barrel when fired is principally due to loading from gas pressure and contact force with the projectile. This paper reports a research project in which a dynamic model of a barrel and a projectile was established in order to investigate the stress response of an artillery barrel. Calculations of propellant gas pressure, in part determined by the position of the moving projectile, were carried out using user-defined subroutines developed in the abaqus/explicit software. Numerical simulations of the dynamic loading process of the barrel were carried out to examine the radial effects of gas pressures. Using this methodology, the evolution of barrel stress distributions was simulated, providing a visualized representation of the barrel's dynamic response. The calculated dynamic stress due to projectile contact alone can reach a peak value of 181 MPa, reflecting the significant effect of contact force on the barrel's dynamic response. Following this, the effect of propellant combustion on the dynamic response was explored, and the results obtained showed that higher initial temperatures produced more pronounced dynamic responses. Moreover, significant differences in stress distributions computed for the barrel revealed deficiencies in the static strength theory for evaluating the operating conditions, due in part to the omission of contact force and other dynamic effects. This paper proposes an alternative investigative approach for evaluating the dynamic stress response of barrels during the initial phases of the ballistics process, and provides information that should lead to updates and improvements of barrel strength theory, ultimately leading to better predictions of firing reliability and operator safety.

References

1.
Yu
,
V. Y.
,
Kohl
,
J. G.
,
Crapanzano
,
R. A.
,
Davies
,
M. W.
,
Elam
,
A. G.
, and
Veach
,
M. K.
,
2005
, “
Failure Analysis of the M16 Rifle Bolt
,”
Eng. Failure Anal.
,
12
(
5
), pp.
746
754
.
2.
Ozmen
,
D.
,
Kurt
,
M.
,
Ekici
,
B.
, and
Kaynak
,
Y.
,
2009
, “
Static, Dynamic and Fatigue Analysis of a Semi-Automatic Gun Locking Block
,”
Eng. Failure Anal.
,
16
(
7
), pp.
2235
2244
.
3.
Cote
,
P. J.
,
Lee
,
A. L.
,
Todaro
,
M. E.
, and
Kendall
,
G.
,
2003
, “
Application of Laster Pulse Heating to Simulate Thermo-Mechanical Damage at Gun Bore Surface
,” U.S. Army Armament Research, Development and Engineering Center, Watervliet, New York.
4.
Xiao
,
H.
,
Yang
,
G.
, and
Ge
,
J.
,
2017
, “
Surrogate-Based Multi-Objective Optimization of Firing Accuracy and Firing Stability for a Towed Artillery
,”
J. Vibroengineering
,
19
(
1
), pp.
290
391
.
5.
Ding
,
C.
,
Liu
,
N.
, and
Zhang
,
X.
,
2017
, “
A Mesh Generation Method for Worn Gun Barrel and Its Application in Projectile-Barrel Interaction Analysis
,”
Finite Elem. Anal. Des.
,
124
, pp.
22
32
.
6.
Jain
,
J.
,
Soni
,
S.
, and
Sharma
,
D.
,
2016
, “
Determination of Wear Rate Equation and Estimation of Residual Life of 155 mm Autofrettaged Gun Barrel
,”
Int. J. Multiphys.
,
5
(
1
), pp. 1–7.
7.
Keinänen
,
H.
,
Moilanen
,
S.
,
Tervokoski
,
J.
, and
Toivola
,
J.
,
2012
, “
Influence of Rotating Band Construction on Gun Tube Loading—Part I: Numerical Approach
,”
ASME J. Pressure Vessel Technol.
,
134
(
4
), p.
041006
.
8.
Liu
,
G.-S.
,
Sun
,
H.
, and
Zhou
,
W.
,
2015
, “
Numerical Simulation for Gun Barrel Bore Damage During Shells With Into Bore
,”
J. Vib. Shock
,
34
(
13
), pp.
78
82
.
9.
Güngör
,
O.
,
2017
, “
An Approach for Optimization of the Wall Thickness (Weight) of a Thick-Walled Cylinder Under Axially Non-Uniform Internal Service Pressure Distribution
,”
Def. Technol.
,
13
(
3
), pp.
150
157
.
10.
Xiao
,
H.
,
Yang
,
G. L.
,
Sun
,
Q. Z.
, et al.,
2017
, “
Multi-Objective Optimization of Gun Barrel Structure Based on Adaptive Neural Network
,”
Acta Armamentarii
,
38
(
10
), pp.
1873
1880
.
11.
Zeng
,
Z.
,
Ning
,
B.
, and
Wang
,
Z.
,
2005
, “
Universal Finite Element Solution Method of Gun Barrel Dynamic Stress
,”
Acta Armamentarii
,
26
(
6
), pp.
725
728
.
12.
Dassault Systemes,
2014
, “
ABAQUS 6.14 Analysis User's Manual
,”
Dassault Systems
,
Waltham, MA
.
13.
Dehestani
,
M.
,
Vafai
,
A.
, and
Mofid
,
M.
,
2010
, “
Stresses in Thin-Walled Beams Subjected to a Traversing Mass Under a Pulsating Force
,”
Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part C
,
224
(
11
), pp.
2363
2372
.
14.
Li
,
Z.
,
Ge
,
J.
,
Yang
,
G.
, and
Tang
,
J.
,
2016
, “
Modeling and Dynamic Simulation on Engraving Process of Rotating Band Into Rifled Barrel Using Three Different Numerical Methods
,”
J. Vibroengineering
,
18
(
2
), pp.
768
780
.
15.
Ma
,
D.
,
Chen
,
D.
, and
Wu
,
S.
,
Wang
,
H.
,
Cai
,
C.
, and
Deng
,
G.
,
2012
, “
Dynamic Experimental Verification of Void Coalescence Criteria
,”
Mater. Sci. Eng.: A
,
533
, pp.
96
106
.
16.
Sun
,
Q. Z.
,
Yang
,
G. L.
,
Ge
,
J. L.
,
Wang
,
P.
, and
Xie
,
R.
,
2015
, “
Numerical Research on Rotating Band Engraving Process of a Large-Caliber Howitzer
,”
Acta Armamentarii
,
36
(
2
), pp.
207
213
.
17.
Miao
,
L. I.
,
Linfang
,
Q. I. A. N.
, and
Chen
,
L.
,
2016
, “
Interior Ballistics' Features During Rotating Band Engraving Process
,”
J. Vib. Shock
,
35
(
23
), pp.
74
79
.
18.
Cheng
,
Q.
,
Yang
,
G.
,
Lin
,
C.
,
Ge
,
J.
, and
Sun
,
Q.
,
2017
, “
The Modal Analysis of Disc Resonator Gyroscope Using Isogeometric Analysis
,”
J. Vibroengineering
,
19
(
1
), pp.
468
476
.
19.
Hasenbein
,
R.
, and
Hyland
,
A.
,
1993
, “
Dynamic Strain Waves and Permanent Bore Enlargement
,”
Seventh U.S. Army Symposium on Gun Dynamics
, Newport, RI, May 11–13, pp. 505–530.
20.
Chevalier
,
O.
,
Langlet
,
A.
,
Fouché-Sanseigne
,
L.
, and
Guilmard
,
Y.
,
2015
, “
Assessment of the Lifetime of Gun Barrels Under High-Speed Moving Loads
,”
ASME J. Pressure Vessel Technol.
,
137
(
1
), p.
015001
.
You do not currently have access to this content.