The objective of the following work was to determine frequency-dependent rotordynamic force coefficients for a new annular gas damper seal design. Both rotating and nonrotating experimental tests are presented for inlet pressures at 1000psig(69bar), a frequency excitation range of 20-300Hz, and rotor speeds up to 15,200rpm. Two different testing methods were used for determining coefficients: (1) dynamic pressure response method and (2) mechanical impedance method. The dynamic pressure method required the measurement of internal seal cavity pressure modulations in combination with the vibratory motion, whereas the mechanical impedance method used the measurement of external shaker forces, accelerations, and motion of the mechanical system. In addition to the new fully partitioned damper seal (FPDS) tests, the same experiments were conducted for a conventional pocket damper seal (PDS) design. Results of the frequency-dependent force coefficients and the internal seal dynamics for the two different gas damper seals are compared. The conclusions of the tests show that the FPDS design possesses significantly more positive direct damping and direct stiffness compared to the conventional PDS. The experiments also show the measurement of same-sign cross-coupled (cross-axis) stiffness coefficients for both seals, which indicate that the seals do not produce a destabilizing influence on rotor-bearing systems.

1.
Vance
,
J. M.
, and
Shultz
,
R. R.
, 1993, “
A New Damper Seal for Turbomachinery
,”
Proc. of the 14th Biennial ASME Conference on Vibration and Noise
,
Albuquerque, NM
, September 19-22, pp.
139
148
.
2.
Li
,
J.
, and
Vance
,
J. M.
, 1995, “
Effects of Clearance and Clearance Ratio on Two and Three Bladed TAMSEALS, TRC-Seal-4–95
,” Turbomachinery Laboratory Research Progress Report,
Texas A&M University
, College Station.
3.
Ransom
,
D.
,
Li
,
J.
,
San Andrés
,
L.
, and
Vance
,
J. M.
, 1998, “
Experimental Force Coefficients for a Two-Bladed Labyrinth Seal and a Four Pocket Damper Seal
,”
ASME J. Tribol.
0742-4787,
28
, pp.
98
109
.
4.
Laos
,
H. E.
, 1999, “
Rotordynamic Effect of Pocket Damper Seals
,” Ph.D. dissertation, Texas A&M University, College Station.
5.
Li
,
J.
,
Aguilar
,
R.
,
San Andrés
,
L.
, and
Vance
,
J. M.
, 2000, “
Dynamic Force Coefficients of a Multiple Blade, Multiple-Pocket Gas Damper Seal: Test Results and Predictions
,”
ASME J. Tribol.
0742-4787,
122
, pp.
317
322
.
6.
Li
,
J.
,
Kushner
,
F.
, and
DeChoudhury
,
P.
, 2002, “
Experimental Evaluation of Slotted Pocket Damper Seals on a Rotating Test Rig
,”
The 47th ASME Turbo Expo Land Sea &Air
, pp.
230
240
.
7.
Ertas
,
B.
, 2005, “
Rotordynamic Force Coefficients of Pocket Damper Seals
,” Ph.D. Dissertation in Mechanical Engineering, May 2005, Texas A&M University.
8.
Childs
,
D. W.
, and
Hale
,
K.
, 1994, “
A Test Apparatus and Facility to Identify the Rotordynamic Coefficients of High Speed Hydrostatic Bearings
,”
ASME J. Tribol.
0742-4787,
116
, pp.
337
334
.
9.
Dawson
,
M.
, 2000, “
A Comparison of the Static and Dynamic Characteristics of Straight-Bore and Convergent Tapered-Bore Honeycomb Annular Gas Seals
,” M.S. thesis, Texas A&M University, College Station.
10.
Vance
,
J. M.
, and
Kirton
,
A. J.
, 1975, “
Experimental Measurement of the Dynamic Force Response of A Squeeze-Film Damper
,”
ASME J. Eng. Ind.
0022-0817,
97
, pp.
1282
1290
.
11.
Hibner
,
D.
, and
Bansal
,
P.
, 1979, “
Effects of Fluid Compressibility on Viscous Damper Characteristics
,”
Proc. of the Conference on the Stability and Dynamic Response of Rotors with Squeeze Film Bearings
,
University of Virginia
, pp.
348
355
.
12.
San Andres
,
L. A.
, 1985, “
Effect of Fluid Inertia on Squeeze Film Damper Force Response
,” Ph.D. dissertation, Texas A&M University, College Station.
13.
Zeidan
,
F.
, 1989, “
Cavitation Effects on the Rotordynamic Performance of SFD Bearings
,” Ph.D. dissertation, Texas A&M University, College Station.
14.
Kaneko
,
S.
,
Ikeda
,
T.
,
Saito
,
T.
, and
Ito
,
S.
, 2003, “
Dynamic Characteristics of Liquid Annular Convergent-Tapered Damper Seals with Honeycomb Roughness Pattern
,”
ASME J. Tribol.
0742-4787,
125
, pp.
592
599
.
15.
Ertas
,
B.
, and
Vance
,
J.
, 2005, “
The Influence of Same-Sign Cross-Coupled Stiffness on Rotordynamics
,”
Proc. of IDETC/CIE ASME International Design and Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference
,
Long Beach, CA
, Paper DETC2005-84873.
16.
Alford
,
J. S.
, 1965, “
Protecting Turbomachinery from Self Excited Rotor Whirl
,”
ASME J. Eng. Power
0022-0825,
87
(
4
), pp.
333
344
.
You do not currently have access to this content.