This paper presents a new design methodology for strutted S-shaped compressor ducts that allows for more aggressive designs while maintaining current levels of duct loss. A baseline duct geometry was selected, which had a radius change to length ratio that is 34% larger than current engine design limits. A large-scale low-speed model of the baseline duct was experimentally tested. The flow in the corner between the hub and the strut was found to separate due to the high local diffusion causing an increase in duct loss. Area ruling was applied to the baseline duct and was predicted to reduce the size and extent of the strut-hub corner separation, but the duct design was compromised. The duct loss coefficient at midpitch was predicted to increase compared with that of the baseline design. Nonaxisymmetric endwall profiling was then used on the duct wall, locally to the strut, to remove the strut-hub corner separation and thus reduce net duct loss, without compromising the duct design away from the strut. The endwall geometry was produced by numerical optimization. It was shown that the net duct loss was insensitive to casing profiling but highly sensitive to hub profiling. The optimal hub geometry was experimentally tested and shown to completely remove endwall strut-hub corner separation. The profiling was found to reduce the net duct loss by 16%. The paper shows that the key benefit to endwall profiling is that it can be used to safely increase the size of the design space in which aeroengine duct designers can operate.

1.
Sucharov
,
L. J. P. H.
, 1971, “
An Analysis of Flow in a Swan Necked Duct
,” MSc thesis, Cranfield University, Cranfield, Bedfordshire, UK.
2.
Abdalla
,
H. A.
, and
Soundranayagam
,
S.
, 1989, “
Flow in Compressor Inter-Stage Ducts
,” ISABE Paper No. 89-7020.
3.
Britchford
,
K. M.
,
Manners
,
A. P.
,
McGuirk
,
J. J.
, and
Stevens
,
S. J.
, 1993, “
Measurement and Prediction of Flow in Annular S-Shaped Ducts
,”
Engineering Turbulence Modelling and Experiments 2
,
Elsevier Science Ltd.
, pp.
785
794
.
4.
Britchford
,
K. M.
,
Carrotte
,
J. F.
,
Stevens
,
S. J.
, and
McGuirk
,
J. J.
, 1994, “
The Development of the Mean Flow and Turbulence Structure in an Annular S-Shaped Duct
,” ASME Paper No. 94-GT-457.
5.
Bailey
,
D. W.
,
Britchford
,
K. M.
,
Carrotte
,
J. F.
, and
Stevens
,
S. J.
, 1997, “
Performance Assessment of an Annular S-Shaped Duct
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
0889-504X,
119
, pp.
149
156
.
6.
Ortiz Dueñas
,
C.
,
Miller
,
R. J.
,
Hodson
,
H. P.
, and
Longley
,
J. P.
, 2007, “
Effect of Length on Compressor Inter-Stage Duct Performance
,” ASME Paper No. GT2007-27752.
7.
Sonoda
,
T.
,
Arima
,
T.
, and
Oana
,
M.
, 1998 “
The Effect of Inlet Boundary Layer Thickness on the Flow With an Annular S-Shaped Duct
,” ASME Paper No. 98-GT-260.
8.
Wallin
,
F.
, and
Eriksson
,
L-E.
, 2006, “
Response Surface-Based Transition Duct Shape Optimisation
,” ASME Paper No. GT2006-90978.
9.
Harvey
,
N. W.
,
Rose
M. G.
,
Taylor
,
M. D.
,
Shahpar
,
S.
,
Hartland
,
J.
, and
Gregory-Smith
,
D. G.
, 2000, “
Non-Axisymmetric Turbine End Wall Design: Part I—Three-Dimensional Linear Design System
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
0889-504X,
122
, pp.
278
285
.
10.
Hartland
,
J. C.
,
Gregory-Smith
,
D. G.
,
Harvey
,
N. W.
, and
Rose
,
M. G.
, 2000, “
Non-Axisymmetric Turbine End Wall Design: Part II—Experimental Validation
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
0889-504X,
122
, pp.
286
293
.
11.
Hoeger
,
M.
,
Sievers
,
N.
, and
Lawerenz
,
M.
, 2001, “
On the Performance of Compressor Blades With Contoured Endwalls
,” MTU, Internal Report No. 21317.
12.
Corral
,
R.
, and
Gisbert
,
F.
, 2006, “
Profiled Endwall Design Using an Adjoint Navier-Stokes Solver
,” ASME Paper No. GT2006-90650.
13.
Wallin
,
F.
, and
Eriksson
,
L. -E.
, 2007, “
Non-Axisymmetric Endwall Shape Optimisation of an Intermediate Turbine Duct
,” ISABE Paper No. 2007-1300.
14.
Dorfner
,
C.
,
Nicke
,
E.
, and
Voss
,
C.
, 2007, “
Axis-Asymmetric Profiled Endwall Design Using Multiobjective Optimisation Linked With 3D RANS-Flow-Simulations
,” ASME Paper No. GT2007-27268.
15.
Place
,
J. M. M.
,
Howard
,
M. A.
, and
Cumpsty
,
N. A.
, 1996, “
Simulating the Multistage Environment for Single-Stage Compressor Experiments
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
0889-504X,
118
, pp.
706
715
.
16.
Ortiz Dueñas
,
C.
, 2007, “
Investigation on the Effect of Length on Intermediate S-Shaped Compressore Duct Performance
,” PhD thesis, University of Cambridge, Cambridge.
17.
Moinier
,
P.
, and
Giles
,
M. B.
, 1998 “
Preconditioned Euler and Navier-Stokes Calculations on Unstructured Grids
,”
Sixth ICFD Conference on Numerical Methods for Fluid Dynamics
.
18.
Roe
,
P. L.
, 1981, “
Approximate Riemann Solver, Parameter Vectors, and Differencing Schemes
,”
J. Comput. Phys.
0021-9991,
43
, pp.
357
372
.
19.
Muller
,
J. -D.
, and
Giles
,
M. B.
, 1991, “
Edge-Based Multigrid Schemes for Hybrid
,”
Sixth ICFD Conference on Numerical Methods for Fluid Dynamics
, Oxford, UK.
20.
Moinier
,
P.
,
Muller
,
J. -D.
, and
Giles
,
M. B.
, 2002, “
Edge-Based Multigrid and Preconditioning for Hybrid Grids
,”
AIAA J.
,
40
, pp.
1954
1960
.
21.
Martinell
,
L.
, 1987, “
Calculations of Viscous Flows With a Multigrid Method
,” Ph.D. thesis, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ.
22.
Burgess
,
D. A.
,
Crumpton
,
P. I.
, and
Giles
,
M. B.
, 1994, “
A Parallel Framework for Unstructured Grid Solvers
,”
Computational Fluid Dynamics’94: Proceedings of the Second European Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference
,
Wiley
,
New York
, pp.
391
396
.
23.
Crumpton
,
P. I.
, and
Giles
,
M. B.
, 1995, “
Aircraft Computations Using Multigrid and an Unstructured Parallel Library
,” AIAA Paper No. 95-0210.
24.
Shahpar
,
S.
, and
Lapworth
,
L.
, 2003, “
PADRAM: Parametric Design and Rapid Meshing System for Turbomachinery Optimisation
,” ASME Paper No. GT2003-38698.
25.
Menter
,
F. R.
,
Langtry
,
R. B.
,
Likki
,
S. R.
,
Suzen
,
Y. B.
,
Huang
,
P. G.
, and
Volker
,
S.
, 2004, “
A Correlation-Based Transition Model Using Local Variables Part I—Model Formulation
,” ASME Paper No. GT2004-53452.
26.
Shahpar
,
S.
, 2004, “
Design of Experiment, Screening and Response Surface Modelling to Minimise the Design Cycle Time
,”
VKI Lecture Series on Optimisation Methods and Tools for Multicriteria/Multidisciplinary Design
.
27.
Shahpar
,
S.
, 2002, “
SOFT: A New Design and Optimisation Tool for Turbomachinery
,”
Evolutionary Methods for Design, Optimisation and Control
,
CIMNE
,
Athens
.
28.
Sobol
,
I. M.
, 1979 “
On the Systematic Search in a Hypercube
,”
SIAM (Soc. Ind. Appl. Math.) J. Numer. Anal.
0036-1429,
16
, pp.
790
793
.
29.
Buhmann
,
M. D.
, 2003,
Radial Basis Functions: Theory and Implementations
,
Cambridge University Press
,
Cambridge
.
30.
Sasaki
,
D.
,
Keane
,
A. J.
, and
Shahpar
,
S.
, 2006, “
Multiobjective Evolutionary Optimisation of a Compressor Stage Using a Grid-Enabled Environment
,” AIAA Paper No. 2006-340.
You do not currently have access to this content.