Numerical calculations, steady as well as unsteady, of flow in a turbine stage with a tip shroud cavity elucidate that the loss-generating flow features consist of tip seal leakage jet, the interaction of cavity exit flow with main flow, the partially recirculating cavity inlet flow interaction with vane wakes, and injection of leakage flow into the shroud cavity. The first two flow features, namely, the tip seal leakage flow and mixing of cavity exit flow with main flow, dominate while the injection of leakage flow plays an indirect role in affecting the loss generation associated with cavity exit flow. The tip shroud cavity flow essentially consists of a system of toroidal vortices, the configuration of which is set by the cavity geometry and changes when subject to unsteady vane–rotor interaction. The role which the toroidal vortices play in setting the cavity inlet recirculating flow pattern and loss generation is delineated. It is suggested that there exists a link between the inlet cavity sizing and the toroidal vortical structure. The computed results appear to indicate that the main flow path approximately perceives the presence of the tip shroud cavity as a sink–source pair; as such a flow model based on this approximation is formulated. Loss variations with tip gap height and leakage flow injection are assessed. Results show that the expected loss due to mixing has a functional dependence on the square of the difference in their velocity magnitude and swirl. The tip seal leakage jet loss scales approximately linearly with the corrected mass flow rate per unit area over the range of tip gaps investigated.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
September 2016
Research-Article
Quantifying Loss Mechanisms in Turbine Tip Shroud Cavity Flows
Timothy R. Palmer,
Timothy R. Palmer
Massachusetts Institute of Technology,
77 Massachusetts Avenue, Building 31-267,
Cambridge, MA 02139
77 Massachusetts Avenue, Building 31-267,
Cambridge, MA 02139
Search for other works by this author on:
Choon S. Tan,
Choon S. Tan
Massachusetts Institute of Technology,
77 Massachusetts Avenue, Building 31-267,
Cambridge, MA 02139
e-mail: choon@mit.edu
77 Massachusetts Avenue, Building 31-267,
Cambridge, MA 02139
e-mail: choon@mit.edu
Search for other works by this author on:
David Little,
David Little
Siemens Energy, Inc.,
4400 Alafaya Trail,
Orlando, FL 32826
4400 Alafaya Trail,
Orlando, FL 32826
Search for other works by this author on:
Matthew Montgomery,
Matthew Montgomery
Siemens Energy, Inc.,
1680 South Central Boulevard, Suite 103,
Jupiter, FL 33458-7395
1680 South Central Boulevard, Suite 103,
Jupiter, FL 33458-7395
Search for other works by this author on:
Anthony Malandra
Anthony Malandra
Search for other works by this author on:
Timothy R. Palmer
Massachusetts Institute of Technology,
77 Massachusetts Avenue, Building 31-267,
Cambridge, MA 02139
77 Massachusetts Avenue, Building 31-267,
Cambridge, MA 02139
Choon S. Tan
Massachusetts Institute of Technology,
77 Massachusetts Avenue, Building 31-267,
Cambridge, MA 02139
e-mail: choon@mit.edu
77 Massachusetts Avenue, Building 31-267,
Cambridge, MA 02139
e-mail: choon@mit.edu
Humberto Zuniga
David Little
Siemens Energy, Inc.,
4400 Alafaya Trail,
Orlando, FL 32826
4400 Alafaya Trail,
Orlando, FL 32826
Matthew Montgomery
Siemens Energy, Inc.,
1680 South Central Boulevard, Suite 103,
Jupiter, FL 33458-7395
1680 South Central Boulevard, Suite 103,
Jupiter, FL 33458-7395
Anthony Malandra
1Corresponding author. Currently at ATA Engineering, Inc., 13290 Evening Creek Drive South, Suite 250, San Diego, CA 92128. E-mail: tpalmer@ata-e.com
2Currently at ATA America, 11360 N. Jog Road, Suite 200, Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33418. E-mail: matthew.montogery@doosan.com
Contributed by the International Gas Turbine Institute (IGTI) of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF TURBOMACHINERY. Manuscript received November 4, 2015; final manuscript received December 7, 2015; published online April 12, 2016. Editor: Kenneth C. Hall.
J. Turbomach. Sep 2016, 138(9): 091006 (10 pages)
Published Online: April 12, 2016
Article history
Received:
November 4, 2015
Revised:
December 7, 2015
Citation
Palmer, T. R., Tan, C. S., Zuniga, H., Little, D., Montgomery, M., and Malandra, A. (April 12, 2016). "Quantifying Loss Mechanisms in Turbine Tip Shroud Cavity Flows." ASME. J. Turbomach. September 2016; 138(9): 091006. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4032922
Download citation file:
Get Email Alerts
Related Articles
Investigation of Three-Dimensional Unsteady Flows in a Two-Stage Shrouded Axial Turbine Using Stereoscopic PIV—Kinematics of Shroud Cavity Flow
J. Turbomach (January,2008)
Experimental and Numerical Study of Honeycomb Tip on Suppressing Tip Leakage Flow in Turbine Cascade
J. Turbomach (May,2018)
Effects of Tip Gap Size on the Aerodynamic Performance of a Cavity-Winglet Tip in a Turbine Cascade
J. Turbomach (October,2017)
Control of Tip Leakage in a High-Pressure Turbine Cascade Using Tip Blowing
J. Turbomach (June,2017)
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Chapters
Pulsating Supercavities: Occurrence and Behavior
Proceedings of the 10th International Symposium on Cavitation (CAV2018)
On the Dispersion Relation of a Vortex Cavity
Proceedings of the 10th International Symposium on Cavitation (CAV2018)
Introduction
Turbine Aerodynamics: Axial-Flow and Radial-Flow Turbine Design and Analysis