Abstract

This paper presents the computational methodology and experimental investigations accomplished to enhance the efficiency of a turbine stage by applying non-axisymmetric profiling on the rotor hub wall. The experimental setup was a two-stage axial turbine, which was tested at “LISA” test facility at ETH Zurich. The first stage was considered to create the flow history for the second stage, which was the target of the optimization. The hub cavity of the second stage was designed with large dimensions as a requirement of a steam turbine. The goal was to optimize the interaction of the cavity leakage flow with the rotor passage flow to reduce the losses and increase efficiency. The computational optimization was completed using a genetic algorithm coupled with an artificial neural network on the second stage of the test turbine. Unsteady time-accurate simulations were performed using in-house developed “MULTI3” solver. Besides implementing all geometrical details (such as hub and tip cavities and fully 3D blade geometries) from the experimental setup into the computational model, it was learned that the unsteady upstream effect could not be neglected. A novel approach was introduced using unsteady inlet boundary conditions to consider the multistage effect while reducing the computational cost to half. The importance of this implementation was tested by performing a steady simulation on the optimized geometry. The predicted efficiency gain from steady simulations was 4.5 times smaller (and negligible) compared to the unsteady approach. Excluding the cavity geometry was also assessed in a different simulation setup showing 3.9% over-prediction in the absolute efficiency value. Comprehensive steady and unsteady measurements were performed utilizing pneumatic, fast response aerodynamic probe (FRAP), and fast response entropy probe (FENT) on the baseline and profiled test cases. The end wall profiling was found to be successful in weakening the strength of the hub passage vortex by a 19% reduction in the under-over turning. As a result, the blockage was reduced near the hub region leading to more uniform mass flow distribution along the span. The flow angle deviations at the higher span position were also corrected due to better control of the flow angles. Furthermore, the improvements were confirmed by reductions in entropy, secondary kinetic energy, and pressure unsteadiness. The accurate computational implementations led to an excellent agreement between the predicted and measured efficiency gain.

References

1.
Riollet
,
G.
,
1970
, “
Curved Channels Through Which a Gas or Vapor Flows
,”
U.S. Patent No. 3,529,631
.
2.
Rose
,
M. G.
,
1994
, “
Non-Axisymmetric Endwall Profiling in the HP NGV’s of an Axial Flow Gas Turbine
,”
ASME 1994 International Gas Turbine and Aeroengine Congress and Exposition
,
The Hague, Netherlands
,
June 13–16
, p. V001T01A090.
3.
Harvey
,
N. W.
,
Rose
,
M. G.
,
Taylor
,
M. D.
,
Shahpar
,
S.
,
Hartland
,
J.
, and
Gregory-Smith
,
D. G.
,
1999
, “
Nonaxisymmetric Turbine End Wall Design: Part I—Three-Dimensional Linear Design System
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
122
(
2
), pp.
278
285
.
4.
Hartland
,
J. C.
,
Gregory-Smith
,
D. G.
,
Harvey
,
N. W.
, and
Rose
,
M. G.
,
1999
, “
Nonaxisymmetric Turbine End Wall Design: Part II—Experimental Validation
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
122
(
2
), pp.
286
293
.
5.
Ingram
,
G.
,
Gregory-Smith
,
D.
,
Rose
,
M.
,
Harvey
,
N.
, and
Brennan
,
G.
,
2002
, “
The Effect of End-Wall Profiling on Secondary Flow and Loss Development in a Turbine Cascade
,”
ASME Turbo Expo 2002: Power for Land, Sea, and Air
,
Amsterdam, The Netherlands
,
June 3–6
, pp.
135
145
.
6.
Schuepbach
,
P.
,
Abhari
,
R. S.
,
Rose
,
M. G.
, and
Gier
,
J.
,
2010
, “
Influence of Rim Seal Purge Flow on the Performance of an Endwall-Profiled Axial Turbine
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
133
(
2
), p.
021011
.
7.
Jenny
,
P.
,
Abhari
,
R. S.
,
Rose
,
M. G.
,
Brettschneider
,
M.
,
Engel
,
K.
, and
Gier
,
J.
,
2013
, “
Unsteady Rotor Hub Passage Vortex Behavior in the Presence of Purge Flow in an Axial Low Pressure Turbine
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
135
(
5
), p.
051022
.
8.
Regina
,
K.
,
2015
, “
High-Pressure Turbines With Novel Airfoils and End Walls Operating Under Engine Representative Aero-Thermodynamic Effects
,”
PhD thesis, Diss. ETH No. 22633
,
ETH Zurich
,
Zurich
.
9.
Lott
,
P. T.
,
Hills
,
N. J.
,
Chew
,
J. W.
,
Scanlon
,
T.
, and
Shahpar
,
S.
,
2009
, “
High Pressure Turbine Stage Endwall Profile Optimisation for Performance and Rim Seal Effectiveness
,”
Vol. 7 Turbomachinery, Parts A and B
, pp.
1075
1087
.
10.
Shahpar
,
S.
,
Caloni
,
S.
, and
de Prieëlle
,
L.
,
2017
, “
Automatic Design Optimization of Profiled Endwalls Including Real Geometrical Effects to Minimize Turbine Secondary Flows
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
139
(
7
), p.
071010
.
11.
Lu
,
J.
,
Chu
,
W.
, and
Wu
,
Y.
,
2009
, “
Effects of Endwall Profiling on Axial Flow Compressor Stage
,”
Volume 7: Turbomachinery, Parts A and B
, pp.
145
154
,
Paper No. GT2009-59418
.
12.
Na
,
Z.
, and
Liu
,
B.
,
2015
, “
Numerical Investigation of Non-Axisymmetric Endwalls in a High Pressure Axial Flow Turbine
,”
ASME Turbo Expo: Power for Land, Sea, and Air, Vol. 2A
, pp.
1
11
.
13.
Jenny
,
P.
,
Abhari
,
R. S.
,
Rose
,
M. G.
,
Brettschneider
,
M.
, and
Gier
,
J.
,
2012
, “
A Low Pressure Turbine With Profiled Endwalls and Purge Flow Operating With a Pressure Side Bubble
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
134
(
6
), p.
061038
.
14.
Hu
,
S.
, and
Luo
,
H.
,
2014
, “
Endwall Contouring Optimization in a High Pressure Turbine Vane With Consideration of Rim Seal Flow
,”
Volume 2C: Turbomachinery
. p.
V02CT38A039
.
15.
Rubino
,
A.
,
Vitale
,
S.
,
Pini
,
M.
, and
Colonna
,
P.
,
2018
, “
Assessment of Fully-Turbulent Steady and Unsteady Adjoint Sensitivities for Stator–Rotor Interaction in Turbomachinery
,”
Proceedings of Montreal 2018 Global Power and Propulsion Forum
,
Paper No.. GPPS-NA-2018-130
.
16.
Fang
,
L.
, and
Li
,
X.
,
2015
, “
Design Optimization of Unsteady Airfoils With Continuous Adjoint Method
,”
Appl. Math. Mech.
,
36
(
10
), pp.
1329
1336
.
17.
Ma
,
C.
,
Su
,
X.
, and
Yuan
,
X.
,
2016
, “
An Efficient Unsteady Adjoint Optimization System for Multistage Turbomachinery
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
139
(
1
), p.
011003
.
18.
Rubino
,
A.
,
Pini
,
M.
,
Colonna
,
P.
,
Albring
,
T.
,
Nimmagadda
,
S.
,
Economon
,
T.
, and
Alonso
,
J.
,
2018
, “
Adjoint-Based Fluid Dynamic Design Optimization in Quasi-Periodic Unsteady Flow Problems Using a Harmonic Balance Method
,”
J. Comput. Phys.
,
372
, pp.
220
235
.
19.
Wilcox
,
D. C.
,
1988
, “
Reassessment of the Scale-Determining Equation for Advanced Turbulence Models
,”
AIAA J.
,
26
(
11
), pp.
1299
1310
.
20.
Papagiannis
,
I.
,
2019
, “
Unsteady Steam Turbine Optimization Using High Fidelity CFD
,”
PhD thesis, Diss. ETH No. 25781
,
ETH Zurich
,
Zurich
.
21.
Numeca International
,
2017
, User Manual FINE/Turbo v.11.2, Brussels, Belgium.
22.
Sell
,
M.
,
Schlienger
,
J.
,
Pfau
,
A.
,
Treiber
,
M.
, and
Abhari
,
R. S.
,
2001
, “
The 2-Stage Axial Turbine Test Facility ‘LISA’
,”
Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo, No. 78507
, p.
V001T03A076
.
23.
Pfau
,
A.
,
Schlienger
,
J.
,
Kalfas
,
A. I.
, and
Abhari
,
R. S.
,
2002
, “
Virtual Four Sensor Fast Response Aerodynamic Probe (FRAP)
,”
The 16th Symposium on Measuring Techniques in Transonic and Supersonic Flow in Cascades and Turbomachines
.
Cambridge
, pp.
1
5
.
24.
Mansour
,
M.
,
2009
, “
A 48kHz Bandwidth, 1.8 mm Diameter Entropy Probe for Aerothermal Loss Measurements in Turbomachinery Flows
,”
PhD thesis, Diss. ETH No. 18087
,
ETH Zurich
,
Zurich
.
25.
Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology
,
2008
, “
Evaluation of Measurement Data—ISO Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement.
26.
Jenny
,
P.
,
2012
, “
Interaction Mechanisms Between Rim Seal Purge Flow and Profiled End Walls in a Low Pressure Turbine
,”
PhD thesis, Diss. ETH No. 20429
,
ETH Zurich
,
Zurich
.
27.
Schüpbach
,
P.
,
2009
, “
Influence of Rim Seal Purge Flow on the Performance of an End Wall Profiled Axial Turbine
,”
PhD thesis, Diss. ETH No. 18458
,
ETH Zurich
,
Zurich
.
You do not currently have access to this content.